In recent years, the agricultural sector has witnessed remarkable advancements aimed at enhancing sustainability and reducing environmental impacts associated with conventional pest control methods. Central to these innovations is RNA interference (RNAi) technology, a breakthrough approach that offers unprecedented precision in targeting pest species without the broad-spectrum toxicity commonly found in traditional chemical pesticides. While the technical merits of RNAi-based biopesticides have been widely discussed within scientific circles, their path toward widespread adoption critically depends on societal acceptance—a complex and multifaceted challenge. A groundbreaking systematic review published in npj Sustainable Agriculture unravels this very intersection between cutting-edge biotechnology and public perception, shedding light on how the social license to operate RNAi biopesticides can be developed and sustained.
The core innovation underlying RNAi-based biopesticides lies in the ability to harness the natural cellular process of gene silencing. RNAi works by introducing double-stranded RNA molecules designed specifically to match and deactivate essential genes in pest organisms, thereby curbing their proliferation or survival. Unlike conventional chemical pesticides, which may harm non-target species, ecosystems, and human health, RNAi biopesticides promise exceptional specificity—affecting only the intended pest species. This molecular precision not only reduces collateral environmental damage but also helps address growing concerns around pesticide resistance and chemical residues in food production chains.
However, technological sophistication alone does not guarantee acceptance or successful integration into existing agricultural practices. The review conducted by Tardin-Coelho, Fletcher, Manzie, and colleagues systematically canvasses global academic, policy, and media discourses to parse the public’s evolving understanding and concerns related to RNAi biopesticides. Their findings underscore a fundamental insight: the scientific narrative must extend beyond laboratory efficacy and regulatory approval processes. Societal trust, shaped by transparency, ethical considerations, and meaningful stakeholder engagement, is equally indispensable to mounting successful public acceptance.
.adsslot_5F3aSyJihH{ width:728px !important; height:90px !important; }
@media (max-width:1199px) { .adsslot_5F3aSyJihH{ width:468px !important; height:60px !important; } }
@media (max-width:767px) { .adsslot_5F3aSyJihH{ width:320px !important; height:50px !important; } }
ADVERTISEMENT
One of the key themes emerging from the review is the critical role of risk perception. Public attitudes toward biotechnological innovations like RNAi are often influenced less by technical details than by cognitive and emotional factors. Issues surrounding the potential unintended consequences, ecological risks, and long-term safety loom large in popular imaginations. The review emphasizes the need for robust, evidence-based risk communication that is accessible and resonant with diverse audiences, tasks that are frequently thwarted by jargon-laden scientific discourse or opaque regulatory frameworks.
Transparency in the research and development process emerges as a cornerstone for building social license. By opening channels for dialogue and public inquiry, developers of RNAi biopesticides can demystify the technology and demonstrate accountability. The review documents numerous cases where stakeholder involvement, including farmers, consumer groups, environmental organizations, and policymakers, successfully mitigated suspicion and fostered cooperative co-creation of risk management strategies. Such inclusive engagement promotes a sense of shared responsibility and aligns technological trajectories with societal values.
The complexity of agricultural ecosystems, coupled with the variegated nature of global food systems, further complicates the acceptance terrain. RNAi-based solutions intersect with cultural norms, economic livelihoods, and regional regulatory landscapes. The review illuminates divergent perceptions in different contexts—where some communities express cautious optimism around reduced chemical inputs, others harbor deep-seated skepticism linked to past experiences with genetically modified organisms (GMOs) or agribusiness practices. This diversity mandates tailored communication strategies and policy frameworks that respect local realities while fostering global dialogues.
Moreover, the study explores ethical dimensions embedded in RNAi biopesticide deployment. Questions around environmental justice, equitable access, and the potential for technology concentration in the hands of major corporations raise important concerns. The review encourages transparency about commercial interests and advocates for frameworks that ensure the benefits of RNAi technologies do not exacerbate existing inequalities in agricultural systems. Addressing these ethical imperatives is pivotal to sustaining legitimacy in the eyes of the public.
The ongoing evolution of regulatory regimes also influences public trust. The review identifies a critical tension between the need for rigorous, science-based evaluation of RNAi products and the imperative for timely market access to address urgent agricultural challenges. Navigating this balance demands adaptive governance models that are responsive to emerging scientific evidence while integrating societal input. Pathways for post-market surveillance and monitoring are highlighted, reinforcing the notion that social license is not a one-time grant but a continuous process.
Scientific literacy and educational outreach surface as vital components in shaping informed public perceptions. The review advocates proactive initiatives that transcend deficit models—where publics are seen as uninformed recipients—to dialogic models that value experiential knowledge and cultural insights. Empowering farmers and communities with a nuanced understanding of RNAi’s mechanisms and implications enables more nuanced decision-making and mitigates polarization.
Importantly, the review underscores the media’s role in framing RNAi biopesticides. Sensationalism or misinformation can exacerbate fears and undermine balanced assessments. The authors call for responsible journalism and science communication that foregrounds evidence, contextualizes risks meaningfully, and amplifies diverse voices. Leveraging digital platforms and social media for interactive engagement represents a promising avenue to reach broader audiences with credibility and clarity.
Future research directions identified in the review include longitudinal studies tracking attitudinal shifts as RNAi biopesticides move from experimental phases to commercial deployment. Such research can illuminate factors that accelerate or hinder acceptance, providing actionable insights for policymakers and developers. The integration of social sciences with molecular biology and ecology is championed as essential to navigating the complex socio-technical landscape.
In summation, RNAi-based biopesticides epitomize a frontier in sustainable agriculture, offering the possibility to revolutionize pest management while aligning with environmental stewardship goals. Yet their success hinges not merely on scientific breakthroughs but on cultivating a resilient social license to operate. This systematic review offers a clarion call to researchers, industry leaders, regulators, and civil society to collaboratively engage with societal concerns, demystify the science, and embed ethical principles at the heart of innovation.
As the global community grapples with escalating challenges of food security, climate change, and biodiversity loss, the opportunity to harness RNAi technology responsibly and inclusively could mark a transformative milestone. The path forward demands persistence and mutual respect, blending molecular precision with social sensitivity. In this brave new era of biotechnology, gaining and sustaining public trust will be as crucial as any gene-silencing mechanism to securing agriculture’s sustainable future.
Subject of Research: Public perceptions and social acceptance of RNAi-based biopesticides in sustainable agriculture.
Article Title: A systematic review on public perceptions of RNAi-based biopesticides: Developing Social Licence to Operate.
Article References:
Tardin-Coelho, R., Fletcher, S., Manzie, N. et al. A systematic review on public perceptions of RNAi-based biopesticides: Developing Social Licence to Operate.
npj Sustain. Agric. 3, 15 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44264-025-00057-1
Image Credits: AI Generated
Tags: advancements in sustainable agriculture practiceschallenges to adopting RNAi technologyecological safety of biopesticidesenvironmental impacts of traditional pesticidesprecision agriculture and gene silencingpublic views on biotechnology in farmingreducing pesticide resistance through RNAiRNA interference technology in agricultureRNAi biopesticides and public perceptionsocial license for agricultural innovationssocietal acceptance of biopesticidessustainable pest control innovations