• HOME
  • NEWS
    • BIOENGINEERING
    • SCIENCE NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • FORUM
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
  • CONTACT US
Friday, August 19, 2022
BIOENGINEER.ORG
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • BIOENGINEERING
    • SCIENCE NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • FORUM
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
  • CONTACT US
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • BIOENGINEERING
    • SCIENCE NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • FORUM
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
  • CONTACT US
No Result
View All Result
Bioengineer.org
No Result
View All Result
Home NEWS Science News Health

Our social judgments reveal a tension between morals and statistics

Bioengineer by Bioengineer
January 2, 2019
in Health
0
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on RedditShare on Telegram

People make statistically-informed judgments about who is more likely to hold particular professions even though they criticize others for the same behavior, according to findings published in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

“People don’t like it when someone uses group averages to make judgments about individuals from different social groups who are otherwise identical. They perceive that person as not only lacking in goodness, but also lacking in intelligence,” says psychology researcher Jack Cao of Harvard University. “But when it comes to making judgments themselves, these people make the same type of judgment that they had so harshly criticized in others.”

“This is important because it suggests that the distance between our values and the people we are is greater than we might think,” Cao adds. “Otherwise, people would not have made judgments in a way that they found to be morally bankrupt and incompetent in others.”

Say, for example, you hear about a man and a woman who both performed surgery – only one of them is a doctor, but which one? From a statistical standpoint, you would consider the fact that there are more men who are doctors than there are women who are doctors; you might also think about the fact that not all people who perform surgery are doctors. From a moral standpoint, you may believe that men and women are equally capable of being doctors. How would you answer?

Cao and coauthors Mahzarin Banaji of Harvard University and Max Kleiman-Weiner of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology hypothesized that people would experience a tension between the statistical approach and the moral approach. The researchers conducted a series of online experiments to test this hypothesis.

In one study, 199 participants learned that a man and a woman had performed surgery. They indicated whether the man was less, equally, or more likely to be a doctor than the woman was. They then learned about another person, Person X, who determined that the man was more likely to be a doctor. Using 7-point rating scales, they indicated how fair, just, accurate, and intelligent they thought Person X was.

The vast majority of participants, 93%, reported that the man and woman were equally likely to be doctors. And they tended to view Person X as not only unfair and unjust, but also inaccurate and unintelligent for stating that the man was more likely to be a doctor.

The results were similar in another online study, in which participants learned about a man and a woman who worked in a hospital, one of whom was a doctor and the other a nurse. Again, the majority of participants (91%) reported that the chance that the man was the doctor was equal to the chance that the woman was. When X made the statistically-based judgement that there was a higher chance of the man being the doctor, they viewed X as unfair, inaccurate, and unintelligent; in this situation, they also shared less money with X when given the opportunity to do so.

However, participants tended to make the statistically-based judgment themselves when they actually estimated the likelihood that a given person who performed surgery was a doctor versus a nurse. That is, they estimated likelihood of the person being a doctor was higher when the person in question was a man as opposed to when the person was a woman.

Despite this, they still criticized Person X for making the same statistically-informed judgment they had made.

Additional findings suggest that participants showed a similar pattern of decision making when the target individual was a pilot. Intriguingly, participants did not endorse the egalitarian judgment or criticize Person X for making a statistical judgment when the target individual was a butcher, firefighter, or construction worker

Cao and colleagues note that all of these experiments were conducted with online participants; however, research suggests that online samples produce data similar to those collected from lab-based samples.

Ultimately, the research reveals a discrepancy between how we perceive own social judgments versus the judgments that others make. The findings may have particular implications in domains such as law, business, education, and healthcare, where “a disparity between values and actions has significant consequences,” Cao explains.

###

All data and materials have been made publicly available via the OpenScience Framework. This article has received the badges for Open Data and Open Materials.

For more information about this study, please contact: Jack Cao at [email protected]

The article abstract is available online at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0956797618805750

The APS journal Psychological Science is the highest ranked empirical journal in psychology. For a copy of the article “People Make the Bayesian Judgment They Criticize in Others” and access to other Psychological Science research findings, please contact Anna Mikulak at 202-293-9300 or [email protected]

Media Contact
Anna Mikulak
[email protected]
202-293-9300

Related Journal Article

https://www.psychologicalscience.org/news/releases/social-judgments-morals-statistics.html
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797618805750

Tags: BehaviorCalculations/Problem-SolvingDecision-making/Problem SolvingMedicine/HealthMemory/Cognitive ProcessesNumber Literacy/General StatisticsOccupation/RetirementPerception/AwarenessPersonality/AttitudeSocial/Behavioral Science
Share12Tweet7Share2ShareShareShare1

Related Posts

The large-scale clinical study identified the long-term rebleeding rates and predictive rebleeding factors

Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: rebleeding rates and rebleeding predictors found

August 19, 2022
Scientists have developed improved methods for generating micro-organospheres (MOS) and have shown that they can be used as patient avatars for studies involving direct viral infection, immune cell penetration and high-throughput therapeutic drug screening - something that is not obtainable with conventional patient-derived models.

Next generation patient avatars: Expanding the possibilities with MicroOrganospheres

August 18, 2022

First in nation: UC San Diego health offers treatment for hereditary amyloidosis

August 18, 2022

Machine learning model predicts fall risk for lower limb amputees with up to 80% accuracy, with implications for future smartphone apps

August 18, 2022
Please login to join discussion

POPULAR NEWS

  • Picture of the horse specimen.

    Ancient DNA clarifies the early history of American colonial horses

    57 shares
    Share 23 Tweet 14
  • Fatigue, headache among top lingering symptoms months after COVID

    40 shares
    Share 16 Tweet 10
  • Chi-Huey Wong awarded Tetrahedron Prize for Creativity in Organic Synthesis

    38 shares
    Share 15 Tweet 10
  • Dogs lying in the middle of the road after sunrise at Kewa Pueblo, in no hurry to start the day

    34 shares
    Share 14 Tweet 9

About

We bring you the latest biotechnology news from best research centers and universities around the world. Check our website.

Follow us

Tags

VaccinesUniversity of WashingtonUrogenital SystemVirologyVehiclesWeather/StormsWeaponryViolence/CriminalsVirusVaccineZoology/Veterinary ScienceUrbanization

Recent Posts

  • Early blood tests predict death, severe disability for traumatic brain injury
  • Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: rebleeding rates and rebleeding predictors found
  • Collaborations inspired early-career NIH grant that could lead to treatment breakthroughs for a range of medical conditions
  • Novel hypotheses that answer key questions about the evolution of sexual reproduction
  • Contact Us

© 2019 Bioengineer.org - Biotechnology news by Science Magazine - Scienmag.

No Result
View All Result
  • Homepages
    • Home Page 1
    • Home Page 2
  • News
  • National
  • Business
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Science

© 2019 Bioengineer.org - Biotechnology news by Science Magazine - Scienmag.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In