In recent years, the critical role of urban green spaces in enhancing city life has gained widespread recognition. Parks, community gardens, and tree-lined streets do more than beautify urban areas—they provide essential cultural ecosystem services that enhance mental health, foster social cohesion, and offer recreational opportunities. However, a groundbreaking study recently published in npj Urban Sustainability reveals a troubling dimension: access to these cultural ecosystem services is not equally distributed among urban populations. The research conducted by Rahman, Grunwald, and Saha exposes systemic inequalities that marginalize underprivileged groups from benefiting fully from urban green spaces.
Urban green spaces contribute to cultural ecosystem services by serving as venues for social interaction, aesthetic appreciation, recreational activities, and spiritual experiences. These services have significant positive implications for public health and well-being. Nonetheless, the study highlights that the provision and accessibility of such services are deeply embedded in socio-economic and spatial inequalities. Underprivileged communities frequently reside in neighborhoods with limited or poorly maintained green spaces, which undermines their ability to access the multifaceted benefits that these areas provide.
At the heart of the study is a detailed spatial analysis combining Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data with socio-economic indicators across several metropolitan regions. This methodological approach allowed the researchers to map not only the quantity of green spaces but evaluate qualitative aspects such as usability, safety, and cultural relevance. Their findings indicate a clear pattern: wealthier neighborhoods enjoy abundant, high-quality green spaces designed to cater to their cultural and recreational preferences, while marginalized neighborhoods are left with fewer, less inviting parklands.
.adsslot_7p9JF83oQv{width:728px !important;height:90px !important;}
@media(max-width:1199px){ .adsslot_7p9JF83oQv{width:468px !important;height:60px !important;}
}
@media(max-width:767px){ .adsslot_7p9JF83oQv{width:320px !important;height:50px !important;}
}
ADVERTISEMENT
Technical explorations within the paper delve into the frameworks that define cultural ecosystem services, connecting them to urban planning theories and environmental justice paradigms. Cultural services are categorized distinctively apart from provisioning and regulating services; they encompass non-material benefits people derive from ecosystems, including heritage values, social relations, and identity formation. By integrating these sociocultural dimensions into urban sustainability discussions, the study underscores the need to rethink green infrastructure planning beyond ecological functions and physical presence.
Perhaps most strikingly, the research emphasizes how urban green space planning inadvertently perpetuates social exclusion. The authors identify mechanisms such as zoning policies that prioritize upscale development, maintenance strategies that neglect certain areas, and a lack of community engagement in planning processes. These factors collectively contribute to what the authors term “green space marginalization.” This phenomenon results in the disenfranchisement of already vulnerable populations from accessing spaces quintessential to cultural expression and everyday relaxation.
Further technical assessment focuses on how these inequities impact health outcomes and social equity. Drawing on interdisciplinary literature from environmental psychology and public health, the authors demonstrate that inadequate access to culturally appropriate green spaces correlates with higher stress levels, reduced physical activity, and social isolation among marginalized groups. They advocate for adopting equity-centered approaches in urban sustainability frameworks to mitigate these disparities and promote inclusive access to cultural ecosystem services.
The study also critiques the dominant metrics that urban planners use to evaluate green space availability. Traditional assessments often measure green space purely by area or proximity, ignoring nuanced user experiences and cultural nuances that shape how different communities engage with these spaces. Rahman and colleagues propose incorporating participatory mapping and qualitative data to capture a holistic picture of cultural ecosystem services in urban contexts.
Rahman et al.’s paper projects future implications regarding climate change and urban resilience. As cities confront increasing environmental stresses—ranging from heatwaves to flooding—the equitable distribution of green spaces becomes vital not just for social justice but for adaptive capacity. Urban green spaces provide cooling effects and serve as natural buffers; hence, ensuring fair access aligns with broader sustainability and resilience goals.
This research also bridges a gap in environmental justice literature by highlighting cultural dimensions that remain underexplored when compared to more widely studied inequities in air quality or clean water access. By focusing on cultural ecosystem services, the study introduces a fresh lens to interrogate how nature and culture intersect within urban landscapes, influencing identity, community belonging, and quality of life.
From a policy perspective, the findings urge municipal authorities and urban planners to adopt inclusive design principles that actively involve marginalized communities in green space development. This participatory approach ensures that green spaces resonate with community values and cultural practices, fostering stewardship and sustained usage. Moreover, the authors call for revising funding models to prioritize equity in green space investments, beyond mere geographical coverage.
One impressive aspect of the study lies in its intersectoral collaboration, merging insights from ecology, social sciences, urban planning, and health sciences. The resulting comprehensive analysis exemplifies how multidisciplinary frameworks can tackle complex urban sustainability challenges more effectively than siloed approaches.
In practical terms, the study suggests several intervention pathways. These include retrofitting underused urban areas with culturally resonant landscape designs, deploying community-led green initiatives that empower residents, and institutionalizing equity audits to monitor green space accessibility regularly. Incorporating cultural ecosystem services into urban planning tools can also refine forecasting models used to predict environmental and social outcomes.
Rahman, Grunwald, and Saha conclude by urging future research to expand empirical investigations across diverse global cities, particularly in rapidly urbanizing regions where inequalities are stark yet understudied. Comparative analyses could yield universal principles for managing cultural ecosystem services equitably while respecting local particularities.
In summary, this pivotal study casts urban green spaces under a new light, highlighting that access to cultural ecosystem services remains a battleground for social equity. It calls for a paradigmatic shift in urban sustainability, advocating that cities become places where nature’s cultural gifts are universally accessible rather than privileges for a select few. The implications stretch beyond academia into the realms of policy, community activism, and future-city envisioning, making it a cornerstone contribution to the global discourse on urban environmental justice.
Subject of Research:
Access to cultural ecosystem services in urban green spaces and the social marginalization of underprivileged groups.
Article Title:
Access to cultural ecosystem services and how urban green spaces marginalize underprivileged groups
Article References:
Rahman, I., Grunwald, A. & Saha, S. Access to cultural ecosystem services and how urban green spaces marginalize underprivileged groups. npj Urban Sustain 5, 36 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-025-00221-z
Image Credits:
AI Generated
Tags: community gardens and social cohesioncultural ecosystem services inequalitymarginalized communities and parksmental health and urban green spacespublic health and green environmentsrecreational opportunities in citiessocio-economic disparities in urban areasspatial analysis of green spacessystemic inequalities in urban planningtree-lined streets and community wellnessunderprivileged neighborhoods and green accessurban green spaces accessibility
