In the complex interplay between viruses and their host cells, a recurring theme is the virus’s ability to hijack the host’s protein synthesis machinery to favor its own replication. Many viruses implement a mechanism known as host shutoff, potently inhibiting the translation of host mRNAs while ensuring that their own viral proteins continue to be synthesized efficiently. This strategy not only subverts the host cell’s antiviral defenses but also reallocates cellular resources toward viral replication. Despite extensive research in the field, the precise molecular basis that allows certain host mRNAs to escape this shutdown and remain actively translated at later stages of infection has remained elusive. A recent breakthrough study by Park et al., published in Nature Microbiology, sheds new light on this enigma by dissecting the translation dynamics in cells infected with vaccinia virus (VacV), a prototypical poxvirus known for its robust host shutoff activity.
Vaccinia virus creates a hostile environment for normal host translation by broadly targeting cellular mRNAs, effectively shutting off the host protein production. However, Park and colleagues leveraged high-throughput RNA sequencing (RNAseq) alongside polysome profiling to investigate the fate of both host and viral transcripts during VacV infection. Strikingly, their analyses revealed that while a subset of host mRNAs showed increased association with polysomes, indicating enhanced translation, only a few translated into higher protein levels across multiple cell types. Among these, the JUN mRNA, which encodes the transcription factor Jun, stood out as the primary host transcript that consistently demonstrated increased protein abundance late in infection, suggesting a special mechanism preserves its translation despite global shutoff.
An intriguing discovery of this study lies in the differing dependence of viral and host mRNAs on translation initiation factors. Through functional assays, the researchers showed that, unlike the host JUN mRNA, viral mRNAs absolutely required the presence of the small ribosomal protein RACK1 (Receptor for Activated C Kinase 1) and the multi-subunit eukaryotic initiation factor eIF3 for their translation. RACK1 is an integral component of the 40S ribosomal subunit and has been implicated in various aspects of translational control. eIF3, on the other hand, acts as a scaffolding factor that recruits the ribosome to the mRNA and orchestrates other initiation events. The requirement of these factors for viral mRNA translation suggests a specialized and perhaps non-canonical mechanism of initiation distinct from that used by host mRNAs like JUN.
.adsslot_VK4u2k9fTS{ width:728px !important; height:90px !important; }
@media (max-width:1199px) { .adsslot_VK4u2k9fTS{ width:468px !important; height:60px !important; } }
@media (max-width:767px) { .adsslot_VK4u2k9fTS{ width:320px !important; height:50px !important; } }
ADVERTISEMENT
A key molecular feature underpinning this differential requirement relates to structural variations in the 5′ untranslated regions (5′ UTRs) of the respective mRNAs. The study highlighted that viral and JUN mRNAs possess characteristically different 5′ UTR architectures, which likely dictate their unique interactions with the translation initiation machinery. This structural divergence appears to direct the recruitment and assembly of the initiation complex in distinct ways, culminating in the observed selectivity during shutoff. Essentially, while viral mRNAs employ an eIF3- and RACK1-dependent mode of initiation, JUN mRNA may utilize a mechanism less reliant on these factors, enabling its continued translation.
To gain structural insights into these observations, Park et al. applied cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) to visualize 40S ribosomal subunits isolated from mock-infected and VacV-infected cells. Their high-resolution structures revealed a remarkable remodeling of the ribosome during infection. Notably, the 40S head domain, which harbors RACK1, displayed an expanded range of rotational movement when bound to eIF3 late in infection. This conformational flexibility is likely to facilitate alternative modes of mRNA recognition and recruitment, accommodating the structurally distinct viral mRNAs. Such ribosomal remodeling underlines the dynamic nature of translational control imposed by the virus and presents a previously unidentified mechanism by which the virus reprograms host ribosomes to selectively translate its own proteins.
Taken together, this work elucidates how vaccinia virus orchestrates a sophisticated temporal regulation of translation during infection. Early on, global suppression of host protein synthesis aids the virus by halting antiviral responses and conserving energy. As infection progresses, VacV repurposes the host’s translational machinery through RACK1 and eIF3-dependent mechanisms to prioritize viral mRNAs. Meanwhile, select host transcripts like JUN continue to be translated via alternative initiation modes, implying they have evolved to coexist with viral manipulation. The selective translation of JUN is particularly notable given its role in transcriptional regulation and cellular stress responses, possibly contributing to viral pathogenesis or cell survival.
This discovery holds broad implications for understanding viral control of host translation and may hint at a general principle applicable to other viruses employing host shutoff strategies. The differential usage of initiation factors and ribosomal remodeling suggests potential avenues for therapeutic intervention. By targeting specific components such as RACK1 or eIF3, it might be possible to selectively impair viral protein synthesis without broadly affecting host translation, offering a window for antiviral drug development.
Moreover, the structural and functional characterization of the 5′ UTRs in viral and host mRNAs enhances our comprehension of non-canonical translation initiation. This adds to the growing recognition that initiation of protein synthesis is a highly versatile and regulated process, adaptable not only to different cellular contexts but also exploitable by pathogens. The juxtaposition of canonical versus alternative initiation modes revealed here may serve as a model to decipher translational control in other diseases or physiological conditions involving selective mRNA translation.
From a methodological standpoint, the combination of RNAseq, polysome profiling, and cryo-EM provided a powerful multi-layered approach to dissect translational regulation in infected cells. Such integrative strategies are crucial for capturing both the biochemical and structural nuances of complex processes like translation under viral attack. The detailed mapping of polysome occupancies aligns well with the structural observations of ribosomal dynamics, presenting a compelling narrative for translation control during host shutoff.
Future work will likely delve deeper into the mechanistic role of RACK1 and eIF3 in facilitating viral mRNA translation. Questions remain about whether these factors directly recognize viral mRNA elements or act through modifying ribosome conformations. Furthermore, the exact contribution of continued JUN protein production to the infected cell environment warrants additional exploration, especially regarding its influence on cell signaling, immune responses, or viral replication cycles.
Another fascinating aspect is the possibility that other host mRNAs might employ similar or yet undiscovered initiation modes that allow escape from host shutoff in different viral infections. Such resilience mechanisms might be critical determinants of cell fate and virus-host equilibrium during pathogenesis. Identifying these could reveal novel facets of translational control and host defense.
In summary, the work of Park et al. unveils a finely tuned translation regulatory network operating under poxvirus-induced host shutoff conditions. By defining discrete initiation mechanisms and structural adaptations of the ribosome, this study provides unprecedented insight into the molecular arms race between viruses and their hosts. It highlights the intricate strategies viruses develop to monopolize the host’s protein synthesis apparatus, while certain host mRNAs strategically circumvent this repression, ensuring the production of key proteins indispensable for cellular functions or viral spreading.
Such foundational knowledge not only enriches our understanding of virus biology but also opens new frontiers in antiviral research. As viral pandemics continue to pose global health threats, deciphering how viruses manipulate translation with such specificity could inspire targeted interventions that disrupt viral propagation without impairing host viability. The interplay among ribosomal proteins, initiation factors, and mRNA structures uncovered here stands as a testament to the complexity and adaptability of the translation machinery under viral duress.
Subject of Research: Mechanisms of translation initiation during vaccinia virus-induced host shutoff, with a focus on differential translation of host and viral mRNAs mediated by ribosomal remodeling and initiation factor dependencies.
Article Title: Distinct non-canonical translation initiation modes arise for specific host and viral mRNAs during poxvirus-induced shutoff.
Article References:
Park, C., Ferrell, A.J., Meade, N. et al. Distinct non-canonical translation initiation modes arise for specific host and viral mRNAs during poxvirus-induced shutoff. Nat Microbiol (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-025-02009-4
Image Credits: AI Generated
Tags: cellular resource allocation by viruseshost cell protein synthesishost mRNA translation escapehost shutoff strategy in virusesinterplay between viruses and host cellsmolecular basis of viral-host interactionsNature Microbiology breakthrough studypolysome profiling techniquesRNA sequencing in virologyvaccinia virus translation dynamicsviral replication strategiesviral translation mechanisms