In a groundbreaking study published in Pediatric Research, researchers have unveiled new insights into the intricate prenatal and perinatal factors that contribute to the risk of cerebral palsy (CP). Utilizing a large-scale sibling-comparison design within a statewide cohort, this investigation sheds light on the complex interplay of genetic, environmental, and perinatal influences that affect the development of CP—a pervasive and lifelong neurological disorder primarily characterized by motor impairment. The study’s methodology and findings offer a pivotal step forward in understanding the roots of CP and hold substantial implications for early diagnosis, preventive strategies, and tailored interventions.
Cerebral palsy represents a diverse group of non-progressive motor disorders arising from brain injury or malformation occurring during the early stages of brain development. Despite decades of research, the etiological factors remain incompletely understood, largely due to the heterogeneity of both clinical presentation and underlying causes. Previous studies have pointed to numerous prenatal and perinatal risks, including preterm birth, infection, and maternal factors, but isolating the direct effects from confounding familial and genetic backgrounds has posed significant challenges. This sibling-based design adeptly circumvents some of these limitations by controlling for unmeasured familial confounding, thereby enabling a clearer examination of specific risk factors.
The sibling-comparison approach hinges on studying pairs or groups of siblings born to the same mother but discordant for CP diagnosis. This design inherently accounts for shared genetics and early familial environments, which are otherwise difficult to control for in traditional cohort studies. By leveraging state registry and health data, the investigators compiled a robust dataset capturing a multitude of perinatal and prenatal exposures. This includes maternal health indicators, labor and delivery complications, fetal growth parameters, and environmental exposures documented prospectively, enhancing the accuracy of exposure classification.
One of the pivotal revelations of the research lies in the nuanced relationship between preterm birth and CP risk. While preterm delivery has long been recognized as a significant risk factor, this study elucidates that its effect size is somewhat moderated when familial confounders are accounted for. This suggests that part of the observed association in earlier studies may be attributable to underlying genetic or familial vulnerabilities shared among siblings. Such differentiation is crucial for clinical risk assessment and counseling, highlighting that preterm birth is an important but not exclusive determinant of CP risk.
Maternal health conditions during pregnancy also demonstrated compelling associations with CP development. Particularly, maternal infections, hypertension, and metabolic disorders were scrutinized. The sibling-comparison model revealed that some of these conditions maintain strong independent associations with CP risk, indicating direct pathogenic roles rather than familial predispositions. For example, intrauterine infections can precipitate inflammatory cascades deleterious to developing neural tissues, and hypertensive disorders may impair placental blood flow, further emphasizing the need for stringent prenatal care protocols.
Labor and delivery factors, including mode of delivery and perinatal complications such as birth asphyxia, were assessed with heightened granularity. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the study found that cesarean delivery per se did not increase CP risk when adjusting for other exposures and familial factors. Instead, it is the underlying complications often prompting cesarean delivery—such as fetal distress—that are more directly implicated. This distinction is vital for refining obstetric guidelines and alleviating unwarranted concerns regarding delivery methods.
Fetal growth abnormalities emerged as another domain of interest. Both restricted and excessive fetal growth were examined as potential contributors to CP. The analysis indicated that abnormal fetal growth trajectories are indeed associated with elevated CP risk within siblings, reinforcing the hypothesis that intrauterine growth perturbations exert deleterious effects on the central nervous system. These findings inform the potential for targeted fetal monitoring interventions to identify and mitigate neurodevelopmental risk.
Environmental and sociodemographic factors, although traditionally challenging to dissect from genetic backgrounds, were partially interrogated through this sibling design. Variables such as maternal smoking, socioeconomic status, and exposure to environmental toxins showed associations with CP risk that were attenuated but not eliminated in sibling comparisons. This suggests that while genetic and familial factors account for some of these effects, modifiable environmental exposures remain significant targets for public health interventions.
The use of comprehensive statewide registries granted the research an unparalleled scale, encompassing thousands of sibling pairs over extended timeframes. The longitudinal nature of the data enabled researchers to track exposures prospectively and assess outcomes rigorously, strengthening causal inferences. Additionally, the robust record linkage minimized recall bias, a common limitation in retrospective epidemiological studies, thereby enhancing the validity of the findings.
Critically, the study also delved into the heterogeneity of CP phenotypes. By subclassifying cases according to motor impairments and associated comorbidities, the investigators could discern differential associations with prenatal and perinatal factors across CP subtypes. For instance, certain risk factors were more pronounced in spastic diplegia compared to dyskinetic forms, underscoring the heterogeneous etiologies underlying CP spectrum disorders.
From a mechanistic perspective, the findings underscore the multifactorial genesis of CP, implicating not only injury-related pathways but also genetic susceptibilities that may modulate vulnerability to environmental insults. This bidirectional framework suggests that interventions may need to be stratified not solely based on identified risk factors but also on the individual’s genetic context and familial history.
The public health ramifications of this study are profound. By delineating which prenatal and perinatal exposures bear the most independent risk, healthcare providers can refine their prenatal risk stratification models. Additionally, these results advocate for enhancing prenatal infection screening, maternal health optimization, and fetal growth monitoring as actionable strategies to mitigate CP risk.
Future research pathways illuminated by this study include exploring the genetic architecture that confers susceptibility to CP in conjunction with environmental triggers. Advancements in genomic technologies, such as whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing, integrated with epidemiological designs like sibling comparisons, promise to unravel these complex interactions further.
In conclusion, this comprehensive sibling-comparison study represents a milestone in CP research. By meticulously teasing apart the web of prenatal and perinatal risk factors while controlling for familial confounding, it advances our understanding of CP etiology and opens doors to precision medicine approaches in neurodevelopmental care. As cerebral palsy remains a significant cause of childhood disability worldwide, such rigorous epidemiological investigations are indispensable for driving forward both prevention and personalized therapeutic interventions.
Subject of Research: Associations between prenatal and perinatal factors and cerebral palsy risk using a sibling-comparison design.
Article Title: A sibling study of the prenatal and perinatal risks for cerebral palsy.
Article References:
Zhuo, H., Rogne, T. & Liew, Z. A sibling study of the prenatal and perinatal risks for cerebral palsy. Pediatr Res (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-04055-4
Image Credits: AI Generated
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-04055-4
Tags: early diagnosis cerebral palsyetiology of cerebral palsyfamily confounding in researchgenetic environmental influences CPlarge-scale cohort studymotor impairment researchPediatric Research findingsperinatal factors motor disordersprenatal risks cerebral palsypreventive strategies neurological disorderssibling comparison studytailored interventions for CP