The principle of direct lineage reprogramming of differentiated cells within the body was first proven by SCRB co-chair and Harvard Stem Cell Institute (HSCI) co-director Doug Melton and colleagues five years ago, when they reprogrammed exocrine pancreatic cells directly into insulin-producing beta cells.
Arlotta and Rouaux now have proven that neurons too can change. The work is being published online today by the journal Nature Cell Biology.
Their experiments targeted callosal projection neurons, which connect the two hemispheres of the brain, and turned them into neurons similar to corticospinal motor neurons, one of two populations of neurons destroyed in Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease. To achieve such reprogramming of neuronal identity, the researchers used a transcription factor called Fezf2, which long has been known for playing a central role in the development of corticospinal neurons in the embryo.
What makes the findings even more significant is that the work was done in the brains of living mice rather than in collections of cells in laboratory dishes. The mice were young, so researchers still do not know if neuronal reprogramming will be possible in older laboratory animals, or in humans. If that proves possible, the implications for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases could be enormous.
“Neurodegenerative diseases typically affect a specific population of neurons, leaving many others untouched. For example, in ALS it is corticospinal motor neurons in the brain and motor neurons in the spinal cord, among the many neurons of the nervous system, that selectively die,” Arlotta said. “What if one could take neurons that are spared in a given disease and turn them directly into the neurons that die off? In ALS, if you could generate even a small percentage of corticospinal motor neurons, it would likely be sufficient to recover basic functioning.”
The experiments that led to the new finding began five years ago when, “We wondered: In nature, you never see a neuron change identity,” she said. “Are we just not seeing it, or is this the reality? Can we take one type of neuron and turn it into another?”
The researchers analyzed “thousands and thousands of neurons, looking for many molecular markers, as well as new connectivity that would indicate that reprogramming was occurring,” Arlotta said. “We could have had this two years ago, but while this was a conceptually very simple set of experiments, it was technically difficult. The work was meant to test important dogmas on the irreversible nature of neurons in vivo. We had to prove, without a shadow of a doubt, that this was happening.”
The work in Arlotta’s lab is focused on the cerebral cortex, but “it opens the door to reprogramming in other areas of the central nervous system,” she said.
Arlotta, an HSCI principal faculty member, is now working with colleague Takao Hensch of Harvard’s Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology to explicate the physiology of the reprogrammed neurons, and learn how they communicate within pre-existing neuronal networks.
“My hope is that this will facilitate work in a new field of neurobiology that explores the boundaries and power of neuronal reprogramming to re-engineer circuits relevant to disease,” Arlotta said.
The above story is reprinted from materials provided by Harvard Science. The original article was written by B. D. Colen