Monitoring biodiversity with sound: How machines can enrich our knowledge

0

Research team lead by Göttingen scientist compares traditional and modern survey methods

IMAGE

Credit: Kevin Darras

For a long time, ecologists have relied on their senses when it comes to recording animal populations and species diversity. However, modern programmable sound recording devices are now the better option for logging animal vocalisations. Scientists lead by the University of Göttingen have investigated this using studies of birds as an example. The results were published in the journal Ecological Applications.

“Data collection by people is less reliable, provides only approximate values, and is difficult to standardise and verify,” says first author Dr Kevin Darras from the Department of Crop Sciences at the University of Göttingen. For comparison purposes, the international research team prepared a systematic overview based on data from previous bird studies. In addition to the collected sound recordings, they also compared the usefulness of both methods.

The result: sound recording devices can provide the same data as those obtained by people during bird “point counts” (the standard survey method where a person logs the birds they see or hear). Sound recordings can be used to measure population densities and map territories of individual species. They can also record entire soundscapes and better measure animal activity over long periods of time. “In a previous meta-analysis, we found that recording devices could detect and identify at least as many species as traditional ornithologists using standard techniques,” says Darras. There are further advantages: enormous amounts of data can be checked, archived and automatically evaluated by computer programs to identify animal species.

“There are now very inexpensive, small devices that can record huge amounts of data over long periods of time and large spaces. In an increasingly data-driven time, they are the better choice.” In addition to the systematic comparison, the study also provides a guide for scientists who sample the noises of animal populations acoustically. The authors give an overview of the currently available recording devices and discuss their modes of operation.

###

Original publication: Kevin Darras et al. Autonomous sound recording outperforms human observation for sampling birds: a systematic map and user guide. Ecological Applications (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1954

Contact:

Dr Kevin Darras

University of Göttingen

Agroecology Group

Department of Crop Sciences

Grisebachstraße 6, 37073 Göttingen

Tel: +49 (0)551 39-33734

Email: [email protected]

http://www.uni-goettingen.de/de/412118.html

Media Contact
Melissa Sollich
[email protected]

Original Source

http://www.uni-goettingen.de/en/3240.html?id=5492

Related Journal Article

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eap.1954

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More