• HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
Sunday, July 27, 2025
BIOENGINEER.ORG
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
No Result
View All Result
Bioengineer.org
No Result
View All Result
Home NEWS Science News Immunology

Federal policy to reduce deaths from sepsis was mostly ineffective

Bioengineer by Bioengineer
April 19, 2021
in Immunology
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0
ADVERTISEMENT
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on RedditShare on Telegram

IMAGE

Credit: UPMC

PITTSBURGH, April 19, 2021 – The first large-scale, multi-hospital evaluation of an “all or none” federal policy intended to improve outcomes in sepsis patients finds that the guidelines are a wash–on average they neither helped nor hurt despite significant investments in their implementation, according to an analysis by University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine clinician-scientists of nearly a dozen hospitals in one academic health system.

The findings, reported today in the Annals of Internal Medicine, indicate ways the guidelines, known as Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: Management Bundle, or “SEP-1,” could be built upon and potentially improved.

“We can’t just stop with SEP-1 as it currently exists. Our data suggest the need for ongoing efforts to refine and update SEP-1 so that it benefits more patients,” said lead author Ian Barbash, M.D., M.S., a UPMC intensivist and assistant professor in Pitt’s Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine. “It’s a big deal to move a health system to install the infrastructure to respond to this kind of measure, so if you’re going to do it, you want to be pretty convinced it will improve patient outcomes.”

Sepsis occurs when a person’s organs cease to function properly as the result of an out-of-control immune response to infection. It is responsible for 1 in 5 deaths worldwide. In the U.S., at least 1.7 million adults develop sepsis each year and 1 in 3 patients who died in a hospital had sepsis, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

In response to these staggering numbers, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) implemented SEP-1 in October 2015. For hospitals to be considered compliant, patients must receive a bundle of treatments, including blood cultures, early antibiotics, regular lab tests and IV fluids, and hospitals must collect and report data on their adherence.

Barbash and his team looked at electronic health records data on 54,225 visits by adult patients at 11 hospitals of varying sizes in the UPMC system, which served urban, suburban or rural populations. UPMC responded to SEP-1 with several strategies common to hospitals across the U.S., including sepsis alerts, electronic order sets and clinical documentation reminders.

The researchers compared data from two years before and two years after SEP-1 implementation.

The most significant change across the study period was that clinicians increased their ordering of lactate measurement, which is a test to measure lactic acid in a patient’s blood to determine if they are experiencing low blood flow or low blood oxygen. But the increased testing did not translate to other changes in care delivery or to less deaths overall.

“It’s not that the bundle elements aren’t good for patients–we know that early sepsis treatment saves lives,” said senior author Jeremy Kahn, M.D., M.S., professor of critical care medicine and health policy and management at Pitt. “The issue is whether SEP-1, as it currently exists, was sufficient to move the needle.

“Tests like lactate are useful when they give you information that you can act on to improve patient outcomes,” Kahn continued. “But testing for the sake of reporting that you did the test is not helpful unless you also do other things.”

Overall, SEP-1 wasn’t associated with clinically meaningful patient outcomes. Deaths from sepsis were decreasing before the policy was implemented and the trend continued as would have been expected afterward. Moreover, a different study found that one academic hospital was investing more than $150,000 per month in responding to SEP-1.

“Sepsis is deadly, but it can be treated,” Barbash said. “I suspect that simplifying SEP-1 and focusing on what works–such as early administration of appropriate antibiotics to the patients who need them–will lead to improvements.

“That said, a limitation of our study was that it included hospitals all in one academic health system–UPMC–which has long been working to improve sepsis outcomes in its patients and currently is working with CMS to improve the measure,” continued Barbash. “It is possible UPMC already had achieved the improvements that SEP-1 might induce at other hospitals.”

###

Additional authors on this research are Billie S. Davis, Ph.D., Jonathan G. Yabes, Ph.D., Christopher W. Seymour, M.D., M.Sc., and Derek Angus, M.D., M.P.H., all of Pitt.

This research was funded by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality grant K08HS025455 and National Institutes of Health grants K24HL133444 and UL1TR001857.

To read this release online or share it, visit https://www.upmc.com/media/news/041921-barbash-sep1-aim [when embargo lifts].

About the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine

As one of the nation’s leading academic centers for biomedical research, the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine integrates advanced technology with basic science across a broad range of disciplines in a continuous quest to harness the power of new knowledge and improve the human condition. Driven mainly by the School of Medicine and its affiliates, Pitt has ranked among the top 10 recipients of funding from the National Institutes of Health since 1998. In rankings recently released by the National Science Foundation, Pitt ranked fifth among all American universities in total federal science and engineering research and development support.

Likewise, the School of Medicine is equally committed to advancing the quality and strength of its medical and graduate education programs, for which it is recognized as an innovative leader, and to training highly skilled, compassionate clinicians and creative scientists well-equipped to engage in world-class research. The School of Medicine is the academic partner of UPMC, which has collaborated with the University to raise the standard of medical excellence in Pittsburgh and to position health care as a driving force behind the region’s economy. For more information about the School of Medicine, see http://www.medschool.pitt.edu.

http://www.upmc.com/media

Contact: Allison Hydzik

Office: 412-647-9975

Mobile: 412-559-2431

E-mail: [email protected]

Contact: Anastasia Gorelova

Mobile: 412-491-9411

E-mail: [email protected]

Media Contact
Allison Hydzik
[email protected]

Related Journal Article

http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/M20-5043

Tags: Critical Care/Emergency MedicineDiagnosticsHealth Care Systems/ServicesHealth ProfessionalsImmunology/Allergies/AsthmaInfectious/Emerging DiseasesMedicine/HealthPublic HealthPulmonary/Respiratory Medicine
Share12Tweet8Share2ShareShareShare2

Related Posts

IMAGE

UMass Amherst grad student awarded fellowship for food allergy research

July 23, 2021
IMAGE

Less-sensitive COVID-19 tests may still achieve optimal results if enough people tested

July 22, 2021

Public trust in CDC, FDA, and Fauci holds steady, survey shows

July 20, 2021

USC study shows male-female differences in immune cell function

July 19, 2021
Please login to join discussion

POPULAR NEWS

  • Blind to the Burn

    Overlooked Dangers: Debunking Common Myths About Skin Cancer Risk in the U.S.

    48 shares
    Share 19 Tweet 12
  • USF Research Unveils AI Technology for Detecting Early PTSD Indicators in Youth Through Facial Analysis

    42 shares
    Share 17 Tweet 11
  • Dr. Miriam Merad Honored with French Knighthood for Groundbreaking Contributions to Science and Medicine

    45 shares
    Share 18 Tweet 11
  • New Measurements Elevate Hubble Tension to a Critical Crisis

    43 shares
    Share 17 Tweet 11

About

We bring you the latest biotechnology news from best research centers and universities around the world. Check our website.

Follow us

Recent News

Durable, Flexible Electrochemical Transistors via Electropolymerized PEDOT

Challenges and Opportunities in High-Filled Polymer Manufacturing

Epicardial Fat: Protector or Threat to Heart Health?

  • Contact Us

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Homepages
    • Home Page 1
    • Home Page 2
  • News
  • National
  • Business
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Science

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.