• HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
Friday, December 19, 2025
BIOENGINEER.ORG
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
No Result
View All Result
Bioengineer.org
No Result
View All Result
Home NEWS Science News Biology

Cricket females choose male losers

Bioengineer by Bioengineer
February 8, 2019
in Biology
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on RedditShare on Telegram

According to popular belief, females prefer males with high social status (alpha males) when as partners to continue the race. However, as recent studies have shown, males losing fights have equal or even greater chances of success among females. The study was published in Frontiers of Ecology and Evolution.

A group of research biologists from Russia used the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus (two-spotted cricket) to demonstrate that in some cases female choice did not depend on the victory in the battles preceding the mating process.

Like the fight between males, the act of mating in crickets is preceded by a period of mating behavior — sound and behavioral communication. Scientists have identified 19 behavioral elements that crickets demonstrate during courtship. To consolidate males status, they vere involved in two rounds of combat in the absence of females. For the second part of the experiment, only absolute champions and absolute “losers” were selected. Those who refused to fight at all or won (and lost) one at a time were not allowed to the second stage of the experiments.

Then the winners were given females, and the aggressive fighters, who did not have time to switch to courtship, perceived the female as their potential rival. Instead of courting, they showed aggression, gave the signals of attack, and started simply beat and bite the female. Such behavior of males does not contribute to romantic relationships and interferes with further courtship.

Unlike alpha males, the losers began courtship as soon as they noticed the female. Lev Shestakov, co-author of the study, sees the reason for the fact that the winning crickets had a high level of hormones responsible for aggression during the battle, and therefore they could not immediately switch to courtship. During the process of courtship and mating, the researchers measured and analyzed 19 types of signals: moving the cricket around the “ring” in search of a partner, following the male behind the female and vice versa, the time between the meeting and the first contact with the whiskers. They also measured the time between the start of courtship and mating directly.

The study is important not only for understanding the mechanisms of sexual selection and studying the preferences of females. “Insects are one of the most suitable models for learning the basic principles of behavior. Even in laboratory conditions, their type of behavior remains closest to the natural. Understanding the basic mechanisms of behavior is important not only to study the mechanisms for choosing a sexual partner with crickets, but also to facilitate the analysis and modeling of the behavior of more complex animals,” Lev Shestakov comments.

###

The study was conducted with the support of the grant of the Russian Science Foundation 14-50-00150.

Media Contact
Lev Shestakov
[email protected]
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00197

Tags: BiologyDevelopmental/Reproductive BiologyEntomologyPopulation Biology
Share12Tweet8Share2ShareShareShare2

Related Posts

Choosing Models: Linking Cat Intake to Socioeconomics

Choosing Models: Linking Cat Intake to Socioeconomics

December 19, 2025
Unraveling Proanthocyanidin Gene LAR’s Evolutionary Journey

Unraveling Proanthocyanidin Gene LAR’s Evolutionary Journey

December 19, 2025

Streptococcus Protein Triggers PBP1a for Cell Division

December 19, 2025

Redefining Sex in Science: Three Rigid Frameworks

December 19, 2025
Please login to join discussion

POPULAR NEWS

  • Nurses’ Views on Online Learning: Effects on Performance

    Nurses’ Views on Online Learning: Effects on Performance

    70 shares
    Share 28 Tweet 18
  • NSF funds machine-learning research at UNO and UNL to study energy requirements of walking in older adults

    70 shares
    Share 28 Tweet 18
  • Unraveling Levofloxacin’s Impact on Brain Function

    53 shares
    Share 21 Tweet 13
  • MoCK2 Kinase Shapes Mitochondrial Dynamics in Rice Fungal Pathogen

    72 shares
    Share 29 Tweet 18

About

We bring you the latest biotechnology news from best research centers and universities around the world. Check our website.

Follow us

Recent News

Optimizing Polyhydroxybutyrate from Waste Oil: Economic Insights

Connecting Individual and Community Health Insights: A Study

RECQL4 Mutations Impact Helicase Function and Chemotherapy Response

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 70 other subscribers
  • Contact Us

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Homepages
    • Home Page 1
    • Home Page 2
  • News
  • National
  • Business
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Science

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.