In an era where urbanization continues to accelerate, the intersection between mental health and access to natural environments has become an urgent topic of scientific inquiry. Recent research sheds new light on the potential for biodiversity-rich recreational areas to serve as powerful, nature-based solutions to mental health challenges, particularly depression and anxiety disorders that have surged in urban populations worldwide. This emerging evidence suggests that the protective and restorative qualities of natural environments extend far beyond traditional urban green spaces, encompassing more complex, biodiverse ecosystems near cities that promise enhanced benefits for psychological well-being.
At the heart of this scientific advancement is a comprehensive global assessment analyzing thousands of cities in relation to their access to biodiverse recreational landscapes. These areas include categories such as recreation-permitted protected areas, Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs), and intact forest landscapes—regions characterized by thriving ecosystems with high species richness and ecological integrity. Unlike managed urban parks, these spaces offer more immersive experiences of nature, which can stimulate cognitive restoration, reduce stress, and mitigate symptoms of depression and anxiety through mechanisms still being elucidated by neuropsychological research.
Quantifying the reach and impact of these biodiversity-rich environments, the study evaluated 9,034 cities worldwide to ascertain proximity, accessibility, and the socio-economic dimensions influencing the frequency of visits. Remarkably, it was found that over 96% of these urban centers have such biodiverse areas within a two-hour travel distance, suggesting a promising baseline infrastructure for promoting mental health through nature engagement. However, the study did not stop at geographic proximity; it rigorously examined affordability and visitation rates, revealing a patchwork pattern with developed regions such as Europe, Oceania, and North America exhibiting the highest accessibility and utilization rates. This implies that economic and infrastructural factors significantly influence the degree to which urban residents can harness these nature-based interventions.
.adsslot_0qKN7ci26o{ width:728px !important; height:90px !important; }
@media (max-width:1199px) { .adsslot_0qKN7ci26o{ width:468px !important; height:60px !important; } }
@media (max-width:767px) { .adsslot_0qKN7ci26o{ width:320px !important; height:50px !important; } }
ADVERTISEMENT
One of the pivotal findings centers on the quantifiable mental health benefits measured through reductions in disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) attributed to depression and anxiety. The analysis indicated a noteworthy estimated decline of approximately 137,299 DALYs globally within the studied population, illustrating tangible population-level health improvements when residents engage with biodiversity-rich natural areas. These reductions also come with a quantified confidence interval spanning a 90% uncertainty range between about 10,000 and nearly 600,000 DALYs, underscoring both the impressive potential impact as well as the complexity inherent in measuring such interactions at a planetary scale.
Beyond prevalence and impact metrics, the study delves into the economic dimension, underscoring that nature-based mental health interventions via biodiverse recreational areas represent cost-effective strategies in many developed settings, particularly in Europe, North America, and South America. This cost-effectiveness emerges from a juxtaposition of relatively low implementation and maintenance costs against the potentially substantial savings in healthcare expenditure and productivity losses associated with mental health disorders. This positions biodiversity-rich landscapes not only as ecological or aesthetic assets but also as economically attractive components of public health policy.
The research also highlights the less examined but crucial factor of travel cost as a barrier to frequent visitation. Many urban residents may face structural limitations such as transportation expenses, time constraints, and inadequate infrastructure that hamper their ability to benefit from proximate natural areas. Addressing this challenge, the study proposes that strategically establishing new, highly biodiverse recreation-permitted protected areas closer to urban conglomerates could significantly lower travel costs, create equitable access, and multiply the cumulative mental health benefits for urban populations. Importantly, such initiatives could simultaneously serve the dual objectives of biodiversity conservation and urban well-being enhancement.
From a methodological standpoint, the study incorporates a sophisticated integration of geospatial data, economic analysis, and epidemiological modeling to capture the multifaceted dynamics at play. Biodiversity-rich areas were identified using a combination of global conservation databases and remote sensing imagery, while accessibility calculations accounted for transportation networks and typical travel modalities. Mental health outcomes were estimated via synthesizing epidemiological literature linking nature exposure to depression and anxiety prevalence, which were translated into DALYs to standardize health impact quantification at scale. These technical approaches reinforce the robustness and relevance of the study’s conclusions.
The broader implications of this research resonate deeply with ongoing discussions about urban planning, public health, and environmental policy. In an increasingly urbanized world, integrating natural biodiverse environments within close reach of city dwellers emerges as a strategic imperative. Such integration could foster a paradigm shift from reactive mental health treatments toward preventive, nature-based therapies embedded within the social and built environment fabric. Moreover, the conservation of biodiverse landscapes near urban centers offers crucial ecosystem services, including air and water purification, climate regulation, and habitat preservation, thereby synergizing health and ecological sustainability goals.
Significantly, these findings challenge urban policymakers and health authorities to rethink the spatial and social equity dimensions of nature access. Even in regions abundant with biodiverse recreational areas, disparities remain in who can feasibly access and benefit from them. Complementary policies are needed to bridge these gaps—ranging from investments in affordable, sustainable transportation to community engagement programs that foster inclusivity. Such equity-focused approaches ensure that the public health promise of biodiversity-rich nature experiences is not limited to wealthier or more mobile segments of the population.
The psychological mechanisms underlying the mental health benefits observed from exposure to biodiversity-rich environments are an active area of interdisciplinary research. Leading theories suggest that exposure to complex, multisensory natural stimuli can modulate neural circuits associated with attention restoration, stress reduction, and affect regulation. Biodiverse settings provide a richer palette of natural features—including diverse flora, fauna, and microhabitats—that may amplify these cognitive and emotional effects. Furthermore, the presence of intact ecological networks supports opportunities for deeper nature connectedness and biophilia, concepts linked to enhanced well-being.
In terms of application, the study’s insights underscore the potential for urban design and landscape architecture to incorporate biodiverse elements purposefully rather than merely increasing generic green space quantity. Conceptualizing urban nature as a gradient—from manicured lawns and playgrounds to wild, ecologically complex habitats—can reshape how planners allocate green infrastructure investments. Achieving this vision entails collaboration across sectors, including conservation biology, urban ecology, transportation planning, and public health, to create multifunctional green spaces serving diverse community needs.
Moreover, the concept of using nature-based interventions as complementary or alternative treatments to pharmacological and psychological modalities represents a paradigm aligned with holistic health frameworks. It resonates with shifting patient preferences toward preventive and lifestyle-integrated therapies. Additionally, nature-based mental health solutions hold promise in mitigating disparities faced by vulnerable populations, such as marginalized communities who may have less access to traditional healthcare services but could benefit substantially from enhanced access to biodiverse environments.
While the study focuses heavily on high-income regions regarding cost-effectiveness, it also opens important avenues for future research in developing contexts. Many rapidly urbanizing cities in low- and middle-income countries lack adequate green infrastructure yet experience a rising mental health burden. Exploring how to optimize biodiversity-rich recreational areas under resource constraints and varying socio-cultural dynamics will be critical to ensuring the global scalability and equity of such interventions.
Finally, this body of evidence reinforces the argument that protecting and restoring biodiversity is not solely an ecological imperative but a human health necessity. Urban residents, often disconnected from complex natural systems, can have their mental health profoundly shaped by proximal nature. By fostering environments rich in biodiversity and accessible to city populations, public health, urban resilience, and global conservation agendas can advance hand in hand. This integrative vision points toward a future where cities are not just centers of economic activity but also thriving landscapes of mental well-being rooted in the richness of nature.
Subject of Research: Biodiversity-rich recreational areas near cities as nature-based interventions to improve mental health outcomes.
Article Title: Biodiversity-rich recreational areas near cities as a nature-based mental health solution.
Article References:
Xia, C., Hu, S., Hu, Z. et al. Biodiversity-rich recreational areas near cities as a nature-based mental health solution. Nat Cities (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-025-00251-9
Image Credits: AI Generated
Tags: access to natural environments in citiesbiodiversity and mental healthbiodiversity-rich recreational areascognitive restoration through natureecological integrity and mental healthglobal assessment of urban biodiversityimmersive nature experiences and stress reductionimpact of green spaces on anxietynature-based solutions for depressionprotecting natural ecosystems for public healthurban parks and psychological well-beingurbanization and mental health challenges