In a groundbreaking exploration of the intersection between artificial intelligence and nursing practice, researchers Gokalp and Yucel have conducted a comparative analysis of nursing care plans generated by three prominent AI models: ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek. This study, titled “Comparative analysis of nursing care plans produced by artificial intelligence models in terms of readability, reliability, and quality,” sets a new standard in evaluating how AI can enhance, or potentially disrupt, traditional nursing practices. As artificial intelligence continues to weave itself into various facets of healthcare, the implications of this research extend far beyond mere academic inquiry.
The methodology employed in this study is particularly noteworthy. The researchers meticulously generated nursing care plans using each of the three AI models, leveraging advanced natural language processing algorithms to ensure that the resulting documentation adhered to clinical guidelines. By systematically assessing each model’s output, Gokalp and Yucel aimed to identify their strengths and weaknesses specifically regarding readability, reliability, and overall quality. This rigorous approach not only highlights the capabilities of these AI models but also underscores the necessity for a careful evaluation of their applications in real-world clinical settings.
Readability is a critical factor in the adoption of nursing care plans by healthcare professionals. The researchers utilized various readability scoring formulas to quantify how easily a healthcare provider could comprehend the generated documents. Their findings indicate that while all three AI models produced text that met basic readability standards, nuances emerge when evaluating the complexity and terminology employed. For instance, ChatGPT tended to use more straightforward language, making it particularly accessible for nursing staff across various experience levels, while DeepSeek occasionally incorporated more technical jargon that might not be universally understood.
Reliability in nursing care plans is paramount, as these documents serve as cornerstones for patient care and decision-making processes. The researchers applied a robust framework for assessing reliability through expert reviews, where health professionals evaluated the clinical soundness of the AI-generated plans. This aspect of the study demonstrates that while each model produced reliable care plans, variances were observed. Gemini’s outputs, for example, received commendation for their thoroughness and adherence to best practices, indicating the model’s potential applicability in high-stakes healthcare environments where precision is crucial.
Quality, another crucial element in the evaluation framework, encompasses various factors such as comprehensiveness, contextual relevance, and alignment with patient-centered care principles. The study found that while each AI model demonstrated strengths in producing quality care plans, there were significant differences in how well each adhered to the principles of holistic nursing care. This is particularly important in nursing, which emphasizes not just biological aspects of care but also psychosocial and cultural factors that contribute to a patient’s well-being. The ability of AI to grasp and articulate these nuances is essential as the healthcare landscape evolves towards more integrated and personalized approaches.
Furthermore, the implications of this research raise substantial questions about the role of AI in nursing practice. The positive aspects of enhanced efficiency and the potential for improved patient outcomes must be weighed against concerns about the depersonalization of care and the potential for over-reliance on technology. As sophisticated AI tools become more prevalent, striking a balance between technological support and the inherently human aspects of nursing will be necessary. This delicate balance will likely be a point of focus for nursing professionals and educators as they integrate AI into training curricula and clinical practice.
Interestingly, the study also delves into the ethical considerations surrounding AI-generated care plans. Questions arise about accountability when care plans produced by algorithms influence clinical decision-making. If a care plan generated by an AI model leads to a medical oversight or error, who bears the responsibility? This inquiry resonates deeply within the healthcare community, prompting dialogues about the ethical implications of integrating artificial intelligence into everyday clinical workflows. The need for a clear framework surrounding accountability and transparency in AI applications is critical as healthcare moves forward.
The findings from Gokalp and Yucel’s research are especially timely, resonating with current discourse on the adoption of technology in healthcare. As healthcare systems strive for efficiency and accuracy in patient care, the use of AI models like ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek could offer valuable resources, provided that their integration is approached with caution and thorough oversight. The role of policymakers will be vital in ensuring that clear regulations and standards are established to govern the use of AI in clinical settings.
Moreover, this research sheds light on the training and support required for nursing professionals to utilize AI-generated care plans effectively. Continuous professional development and education will be needed to equip nurses with the necessary skills to critically assess AI outputs. While AI can facilitate numerous aspects of care planning, the human touch remains irreplaceable. Ensuring that nurses are confident in leveraging these technological advancements while maintaining a patient-first approach will be essential for future healthcare models.
In conclusion, the comparative analysis conducted by Gokalp and Yucel serves as a significant milestone in understanding the potential and challenges of AI in nursing. By evaluating AI-generated care plans through lenses of readability, reliability, and quality, the researchers offer a comprehensive insight into how these tools can complement, rather than replace, the critical work that nurses perform. Achieving nursing excellence in the age of artificial intelligence demands an ongoing commitment to evaluation, adaptation, and ethical scrutiny. The landscape of healthcare is undoubtedly shifting, and studies like this pave the way for a more informed, thoughtful embrace of technology in nursing practice.
Subject of Research: The comparative analysis of nursing care plans produced by artificial intelligence models.
Article Title: Comparative analysis of nursing care plans produced by artificial intelligence models (ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek) in terms of readability, reliability, and quality.
Article References:
Gokalp, M.G., Yucel, S.C. Comparative analysis of nursing care plans produced by artificial intelligence models (ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek) in terms of readability, reliability, and quality.
BMC Nurs (2026). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-026-04295-7
Image Credits: AI Generated
DOI: 10.1186/s12912-026-04295-7
Keywords: artificial intelligence, nursing care plans, readability, reliability, quality, healthcare, ChatGPT, Gemini, DeepSeek.
Tags: AI nursing care plansChatGPT in healthcarecomparative analysis of AI in nursingDeepSeek AI applicationsevaluating AI in clinical settingsGemini AI in nursing practiceimplications of AI in healthcarenatural language processing in nursingnursing practice and artificial intelligencequality assessment of AI-generated plansreadability in healthcare documentationreliability of AI models in nursing
