In the dimly lit confines of a narrow tube, a weakly electric glass knifefish weaves through its environment, alternating sharply between rapid bursts of movement and slower, deliberate actions. This unassuming freshwater fish has recently become the centerpiece of an ambitious interdisciplinary project aimed at unraveling one of neuroscience’s enduring puzzles: how do animals decide when to explore their surroundings for sensory information, and when to exploit what they have learned to accomplish a goal? Led by Noah Cowan at Johns Hopkins University, with collaborators from the University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC), New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT), and the University of Minnesota, this research initiative probes how the brain navigates the “explore/exploit” dilemma, a fundamental decision-making process pervasive across species.
The team’s work pivots on a deceptively simple behavioral dichotomy observed in this species: the switch between “explore,” characterized by swift, erratic movements to gather sensory data, and “exploit,” slower, focused behaviors aimed at executing known tasks. These alternating modes are not only critical for survival in complex, often unpredictable environments but may also provide clues to designing adaptive robotics and uncovering hidden layers of brain function. The fish owe their ethereal ghost-like movements to their electrosensory system, which they employ to navigate and hunt in murky waters, generating weak electric fields to sense obstacles and prey alike.
Previous foundational work, published in 2023 in the prestigious journal Nature Machine Intelligence, identified remarkably consistent patterns of explore/exploit behavior not just in glass knifefish but across a broad phylogenetic spectrum stretching from unicellular amoebas to humans. This cross-species similarity suggests that the neural principles governing such decision-making are deeply conserved, pointing to fundamental biological rules. In those studies, researchers meticulously analyzed velocity profiles and behavioral modes, identifying bimodal patterns reflective of alternating exploratory bursts and exploitative glide phases.
What sets the new project apart is its expanded temporal scope and technical sophistication. Earlier experiments captured brief snapshots—approximately 40 seconds per trial—insufficient to tease apart the nuanced dynamics underlying mode switches. Now, with trials extended to 10 minutes, the team is poised to observe subtler behavioral metrics, such as the length of movement bursts, spatial correlations within the constrained environment, and potentially the triggers that precipitate shifts between modes. These detailed observations will enable a granular understanding of behavior unfolding over time scales that better simulate the challenges animals face in the wild.
Central to advancing these insights is the incorporation of cutting-edge neural recording techniques. For the first time, electrodes implanted in the brains of glass knifefish will capture real-time neural activity concurrent with behavior. This endeavor, led by biologist Eric Fortune at NJIT, overcomes a formidable obstacle faced by earlier studies where neural correlates were inferred indirectly. Such direct neural-behavioral mapping empowers the team to investigate the mechanistic substrate of decision making—probing how fluctuating internal states and sensory uncertainty interact within neural circuits to influence mode switching.
The hypothesis under scrutiny posits that the fish’s decision to switch modes hinges on an internal estimation of uncertainty. If the fish perceives ambiguity about its location within the tube, it triggers an exploratory movement burst to actively gather sensory data, reducing uncertainty before resuming goal-directed behavior. This theory aligns with broader computational neuroscience perspectives that conceptualize the brain as an inference engine constantly balancing information acquisition against action execution. To model these complex processes, the team integrates sophisticated machine learning algorithms developed at the University of Minnesota, transforming behavioral and sensory datasets into mathematical functions capable of capturing underlying causal relationships.
Kathleen Hoffman, professor of mathematics and statistics at UMBC and a pivotal figure in the project, underscores the importance of combining human intuition with formal computational tools. Her approach begins with manual pattern recognition—visually parsing velocity and position data to hypothesize behavioral motifs—before encoding these observations into automated analyses to rigorously test their recurrence across the expanded dataset. This iterative interplay of qualitative and quantitative techniques exemplifies how mathematics and statistics can serve as a bridge between raw biological data and interpretable models.
Noah Cowan highlights the collaborative synergy driving this research forward. His laboratory’s decade-long struggle to decipher glass knifefish behavior finds new momentum through the assembly of this multidisciplinary “dream team” of neuroscientists, engineers, mathematicians, and computer scientists. Each expert contributes a vital piece of the puzzle, from behavioral assays and neural physiology to data analytics and algorithm development. The project’s holistic scope exemplifies modern neuroscience’s embrace of integrative methods to unravel complex brain-body-environment interactions.
Beyond its scientific ambition, the project holds transformative potential for technological innovation. In robotics, mimicking the intermittent sensing tactics observed in these animals could revolutionize navigation in uncertain or hazardous terrains—such as disaster zones—where continuous scanning is costly and inefficient. By understanding the decision rules underlying when to explore versus exploit, engineers can design robots that adapt their sensor usage dynamically, conserving energy and optimizing task performance. Moreover, the discovery of common neural strategies across species hints at broader biomedical applications, including new insights into neurological conditions characterized by impaired decision-making, though such clinical implications remain speculative at this stage.
An equally important facet of the project is its educational mandate. By integrating undergraduate students into the data visualization and analysis pipeline, the team fosters hands-on interdisciplinary training, preparing the next generation of researchers to tackle complex, multifaceted questions at the intersection of biology, mathematics, and engineering. This educational dimension ensures that the ripple effects of the research will extend beyond immediate scientific outcomes, nurturing a culture of collaborative, cross-domain inquiry.
In sum, this initiative encapsulates a profound scientific endeavor: to decode the algorithms etched into neural circuits that orchestrate the fundamental trade-off between exploring new information and exploiting known resources. The weakly electric glass knifefish, with its elegant dichotomy of movement modes and accessible neural architecture, offers a compelling window into these processes. As data collection scales up and analytical methods mature, the team anticipates breakthroughs that could not only complete a decade-long quest but also catalyze advances in robotics, neuroscience, and our fundamental understanding of decision-making.
The cutting-edge fusion of experimental neuroscience, theoretical mathematics, and machine learning in this project highlights the evolving nature of scientific discovery—one that transcends disciplinary silos to tackle the complexity of living systems. With each carefully recorded flicker of the glass knifefish’s electric field, scientists edge closer to deciphering the language of the brain’s internal compass, illuminating pathways that govern behavior from the simplest organisms to ourselves.
Subject of Research: Neural mechanisms underlying explore/exploit behavior in animals, studied through the weakly electric glass knifefish as a model.
Article Title: [not explicitly stated in the source]
News Publication Date: [not explicitly stated in the source]
Web References:
Collaborative Research in Computational Neuroscience (CRCNS): https://www.nsf.gov/funding/opportunities/crcns-collaborative-research-computational-neuroscience
Prior related publication in Nature Machine Intelligence: https://www.nature.com/articles/s42256-023-00745-y
UMBC story on animal decision-making: https://umbc.edu/stories/animal-decision-making-with-robotics-applications/
References:
Hoffman, K., Cowan, N., et al. (2023). Explore/Exploit behavior across species. Nature Machine Intelligence.
(Additional references not specified)
Image Credits: Noah Cowan
Keywords:
Explore/exploit decision-making, glass knifefish, neuroscience, computational neuroscience, machine learning, behavioral neuroscience, neural recordings, robotics, sensory uncertainty, interdisciplinary research
Tags: adaptive robotics designanimal decision-makingbehavioral dichotomy in animalsbrain function explorationelectrosensory system in fishexplore vs exploit dilemmainterdisciplinary research projectsJohns Hopkins University researchneuroscience research fundingsensory information gatheringsurvival strategies in animalsweakly electric glass knifefish studies
