• HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
Wednesday, November 5, 2025
BIOENGINEER.ORG
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
No Result
View All Result
Bioengineer.org
No Result
View All Result
Home NEWS Science News Biology

Why a ‘cuckoo in the nest’ can go undetected

Bioengineer by Bioengineer
September 27, 2018
in Biology
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on RedditShare on Telegram
IMAGE

Credit: Professor William Foster, University of Cambridge

Researchers at the Universities of Exeter and Cambridge have shed light on why some species cannot tell the difference between their own offspring and those of intruders that have been slipped into their nests.

It has previously been observed that parents are often incapable of recognising genetic differences between their offspring and the offspring of another parent in their nest. The study is the first to show how this surprising inability may have arisen through a phenomenon known as Crozier's effect. For this effect to work, it is crucial that the individuals can act, in their lifetime, as both hosts and parasites.

Parents might detect a foreign 'cuckoo' offspring by comparing its genetic features with their own. In the Digger wasps studied, rejection involves considerable wastage of resources, because an offspring is thrown out of the nest along with some of the food that was provided for it.

The scientists worked out what the effect of carrying a rare genetic feature used to identify parasitic offspring would be in comparison with a common feature.

They showed that because wasps with a rare feature would less often match other wasps, they would be involved in more of the wasteful rejection interactions. Since being different is therefore a disadvantage, rarer genetic features associated with recognition may have died out, so that everyone looks the same. Recognition based on genetic features cannot then occur.

The study is published in Current Biology and was partly funded by the Natural Environment Research Council.

Lead author Professor Jeremy Field of the University of Exeter said: "Females of many species sneak their offspring into the care of other parents, offloading the effort of nurturing the offspring. Despite genetic differences, the parents are often incapable of differentiating between the parasitic offspring and their own, and are not able to reject them on this basis.

"We investigated how this inability to recognise genetic differences may have arisen by observing the phenomenon in Digger wasps, which – as well as laying eggs in their own burrows – often go into each other's burrows and replace the host's egg with their own. This results in either rejection of the foreign offspring, or acceptance, where the host continues to deliver food as if the offspring was its own."

Brood parasitism, where some individuals put their offspring into the care of other parents in the hope that they will raise them, is seen in many insect, bird and fish species.

The researchers then inserted foreign offspring into the burrows of other wasps experimentally. They showed that there was no difference between the rates of rejection of foreign versus own offspring, suggesting that host wasps were indeed incapable of detecting the difference.

Dr William Foster of the University of Cambridge said:

"We show that genetic differences between the parasitic offspring and host have no influence on rejection, and that other factors may be responsible, such as the difference in age between the host's offspring and that of the parasite."

The findings may explain why other organisms, including many bird species, are also often incapable of determining the difference between their own offspring and parasitic offspring.

###

The paper is entitled 'Crozier's Effect and the Acceptance of Intraspecific Brood Parasites'. The full list of authors is Jeremy Field, Chris Accleton (University of Exeter) and William A. Foster (University of Cambridge).

Media Contact

Alex Morrison
[email protected]
44-139-272-4828
@uniofexeter

http://www.exeter.ac.uk

Share12Tweet8Share2ShareShareShare2

Related Posts

blank

Unveiling Wheat’s Defense Against WSMV: A Transcriptomic Study

November 4, 2025
blank

Unveiling Wheat’s Defense Against WSMV: A Transcriptomic Study

November 4, 2025

Unraveling the Connections Between Brain Development and Mental Health

November 4, 2025

ASBMB Announces Launch of Insights in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, a New Journal Showcasing Breakthroughs Across Molecular Life Sciences

November 4, 2025
Please login to join discussion

POPULAR NEWS

  • Sperm MicroRNAs: Crucial Mediators of Paternal Exercise Capacity Transmission

    1298 shares
    Share 518 Tweet 324
  • Stinkbug Leg Organ Hosts Symbiotic Fungi That Protect Eggs from Parasitic Wasps

    313 shares
    Share 125 Tweet 78
  • ESMO 2025: mRNA COVID Vaccines Enhance Efficacy of Cancer Immunotherapy

    205 shares
    Share 82 Tweet 51
  • New Study Suggests ALS and MS May Stem from Common Environmental Factor

    138 shares
    Share 55 Tweet 35

About

We bring you the latest biotechnology news from best research centers and universities around the world. Check our website.

Follow us

Recent News

Plasma Treatment Enhances Antibacterial Performance of Silica-Based Materials

Nomogram Developed for Sarcopenia Screening in Osteoporosis

Projectile Impact on Human Bone and Polyurethane Simulant

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 67 other subscribers
  • Contact Us

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Homepages
    • Home Page 1
    • Home Page 2
  • News
  • National
  • Business
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Science

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.