In a groundbreaking study published in Nature, researchers have unveiled the intricate neural mechanisms underpinning dietary preference, challenging long-held assumptions about the roles of peripheral taste receptors in food choice evolution. By examining closely related fruit fly species—Drosophila sechellia, Drosophila simulans, and Drosophila melanogaster—the team has illuminated how central processing within the brain, rather than mere receptor changes, drives species-specific feeding behaviors and niche adaptation.
Diet is widely recognized as a pivotal evolutionary trait that influences speciation and ecological niche invasion. However, the neurobiological basis by which animals shift their dietary preferences remains poorly understood. Enter the trio of fruit fly species, which present an exquisite model to dissect these mechanisms: Drosophila sechellia is a renowned dietary specialist, feeding exclusively on the toxic fruit Morinda citrifolia (commonly known as noni), while its relatives D. simulans and D. melanogaster showcase more generalized feeding patterns across diverse food sources.
The researchers first employed quantitative feeding assays to establish baseline preferences among the species. As anticipated, D. sechellia demonstrated a clear and exclusive preference for noni fruit, which contrasted starkly with the more opportunistic feeding behaviors of D. simulans and D. melanogaster. This behavioral divergence set the stage for a detailed investigation into the sensory underpinnings that might explain such specialized feeding choices.
Using calcium imaging of peripheral taste neurons, the authors discovered nuanced differences in how bitter compounds, including those derived from noni, are detected among the species. While the neuronal responses to sweet stimuli remained largely conserved, D. sechellia’s bitter-sensing neurons exhibited a markedly heightened activation to noni’s bitter components. This finding suggested that bitter taste perception could be an evolutionary focal point contributing to dietary specialization.
Delving deeper at the molecular level, the team identified a crucial genetic alteration underlying this enhanced bitter sensitivity: a small deletion within a single gustatory receptor gene in D. sechellia. This mutation increased the receptor’s responsiveness to the complex chemical milieu of noni fruit, rendering the flies more sensitive to its bitterness yet paradoxically enabling their exclusive preference for this otherwise toxic food source. Such data underscore the importance of subtle genetic modifications in sensory receptor architecture as evolutionary drivers.
However, the story did not end with peripheral taste receptor changes. To understand how taste signals translate into behavioral outputs, the team leveraged volumetric calcium imaging to map neural activity patterns in the ventral brain’s sensorimotor circuits. Strikingly, the data indicated that differences in food preference were more faithfully recapitulated at this central processing stage rather than by peripheral sensory neuron responsiveness alone.
Specifically, when exposed to noni and sucrose—a representative sweet stimulus—the neuronal activity patterns within the sensorimotor circuits diverged between D. sechellia and its generalist cousins. In D. sechellia, noni stimuli elicited robust activation within pathways that promote feeding, while sucrose induced comparatively weaker responses. Conversely, D. simulans and D. melanogaster responded preferentially to sweet cues with diminished central activation by noni. This neurophysiological divergence at the integration and processing level effectively reprograms behavioral output, driving the specialist feeding behavior of D. sechellia.
By integrating molecular genetics, sensory neurobiology, and functional brain imaging, the study compellingly argues that shifts in dietary preference emerge predominantly from central modifications in sensorimotor circuit processing, rather than from alterations confined to peripheral sensory receptors. This paradigm shift challenges classical views that receptor evolution alone underpins ecological specialization and suggests that brain circuit plasticity holds a key role in adaptive feeding behaviors.
The evolutionary implications of these findings are profound. They suggest that even modest genetic tweaks affecting receptor function can be further sculpted by downstream neural circuit adaptations to yield species-specific traits. Moreover, such neural processing changes are likely critical in facilitating niche specialization, allowing organisms to exploit novel or otherwise unutilized food sources that confer selective advantages.
Importantly, this research informs broader questions linking sensory perception to behavior and ecological fitness. It exemplifies how sensory systems and motor command circuits co-evolve to mediate complex, adaptive behaviors that shape an organism’s interaction with its environment. Such insights deepen our understanding of how neurobiological mechanisms drive speciation and ecological diversification.
Furthermore, the use of Drosophila species as a comparative model underscores the power of combining genetic tools with high-resolution functional imaging. This integrative approach holds promise for uncovering general principles governing the neural control of behavior across taxa, including mammals, where diet-induced behavioral adaptations are also vital for survival and evolution.
As human dietary choices and preferences increasingly impact ecological dynamics and public health, the fundamental knowledge gleaned from studies like this enriches the conceptual framework for exploring how nervous systems evolve to accommodate changing nutritional landscapes. The elegance of this study lies in its demonstration that divergent behavioral phenotypes can emerge from nuanced modifications in brain circuitry rather than isolated changes at sensory input points alone.
Looking ahead, this research sets the stage for future explorations into the genetic and neural basis of complex behaviors, emphasizing the need to focus beyond peripheral sensory elements and into central processing pathways. Such multidimensional perspectives are essential for unraveling the full mechanistic tapestry by which animals navigate and adapt to their dietary environments.
In summary, the evolutionary journey of dietary preference, as revealed by Drosophila taste circuits, is orchestrated not simply by receptor gene mutations but by sophisticated shifts in central neural processing. This discovery rewrites conventional narratives about feeding behavior evolution and opens avenues to explore brain-behavior evolution with unprecedented clarity.
Subject of Research: Evolutionary neurobiology of taste processing and dietary preference in Drosophila species
Article Title: Evolution of taste processing shifts dietary preference
Article References:
Bertolini, E., Münch, D., Pascual, J. et al. Evolution of taste processing shifts dietary preference. Nature (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09766-6
Image Credits: AI Generated
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09766-6
Keywords: taste processing, dietary preference, Drosophila sechellia, gustatory receptors, sensorimotor circuits, evolutionary neurobiology, food choice, calcium imaging, neural circuitry, speciation
Tags: dietary preferences in DrosophilaDrosophila melanogaster feeding patternsecological niche adaptation in speciesevolutionary traits influencing diet.feeding assays in evolutionary biologyfeeding behavior differences among Drosophila speciesimpact of diet on speciationneurobiological mechanisms of food choiceperipheral taste receptors vs. central processingrole of central processing in dietary shiftstaste evolution in fruit fliestoxic fruit consumption in Drosophila sechellia
