• HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
Wednesday, February 4, 2026
BIOENGINEER.ORG
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
No Result
View All Result
Bioengineer.org
No Result
View All Result
Home NEWS Science News Biology

Relative restrictiveness of each state’s voting environment in 2020

Bioengineer by Bioengineer
October 19, 2020
in Biology
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
IMAGE
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on RedditShare on Telegram

IMAGE

Credit: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers

New Rochelle, NY, October 19, 2020–Texas has the most restrictive electoral environment in 2020, and Oregon has the least restrictive voting practices of the 50 states. This is based on a study of the relative “cost of voting” in each of the 50 states, as described in the peer-reviewed Election Law Journal. Click here (http://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2020.0666) to read the Issue now.

Many states have gone out of their way to reduce the cost of voting and make it more hassle free, for example, by adopting automatic voter registration processes. Other states have failed to innovate and adopt technological advances that could make it easier for the public to vote. A few states, such as Texas, have increased the restrictiveness of voting mainly by reducing the number of polling stations.

“What is abundantly clear from the examples of Virginia and Michigan is that if a state wishes to make voting more accessible it is entirely possible to do so. Particularly interesting is the fact that some of the reforms, such as online voter registration, are found to come with a reduced monetary cost for states,” say Scot Schraufnagel, Northern Illinois University, and coauthors.

“The ease of voting varies tremendously across the 50 states and the political battles over access to the polls have never been more intense. This timely article provides an updated comparison of the costs of voting in the states,” says Election Law Journal Editor-in-Chief David Canon, University of Wisconsin.

###

About the Journal

Election Law Journal (https://home.liebertpub.com/publications/election-law-journal/101) is an authoritative peer-reviewed journal published quarterly online with open access options and in print that provides global, interdisciplinary coverage of election law, policy, and administration. Led by Editor-in-Chief David Canon, University of Wisconsin, the Journal covers the field of election law for practicing attorneys, election administrators, political professionals, legal scholars, and social scientists, and covers election design and reform on the federal, state, and local levels. Complete tables of contents and a sample issue are available on the Election Law Journal (https://home.liebertpub.com/publications/election-law-journal/101) website.

About the Publisher

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers (https://home.liebertpub.com/) is known for establishing authoritative peer-reviewed journals in many promising areas of science and biomedical research and law. A complete list of the firm’s 90 journals, books, and newsmagazines is available on the Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers (https://home.liebertpub.com/) website.

Media Contact
Kathryn Ryan
[email protected]

Original Source

https://home.liebertpub.com/news/relative-restrictiveness-of-each-states-voting-environment-in-2020/3769

Related Journal Article

http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/elj.2020.0666

Tags: Animal Research/RightsClimate ChangeGuidelines/Treaties/AgreementsLaw EnforcementPolicy/EthicsScience/Health and the Law
Share12Tweet8Share2ShareShareShare2

Related Posts

High-Dose Antioxidants May Increase Risk of Birth Defects, Texas A&M Study Shows

High-Dose Antioxidants May Increase Risk of Birth Defects, Texas A&M Study Shows

February 4, 2026
blank

Scientists Identify Oral Compound That Advances the Body’s Internal Clock

February 4, 2026

Chronic Cellular Stress Fuels Liver Cancer Yet Heightens Tumor Susceptibility to Immunotherapy

February 4, 2026

New Transgenic Zebrafish Model Accelerates Decades of Muscle Atrophy Research into Weeks

February 4, 2026
Please login to join discussion

POPULAR NEWS

  • Enhancing Spiritual Care Education in Nursing Programs

    158 shares
    Share 63 Tweet 40
  • Robotic Ureteral Reconstruction: A Novel Approach

    81 shares
    Share 32 Tweet 20
  • Digital Privacy: Health Data Control in Incarceration

    63 shares
    Share 25 Tweet 16
  • Study Reveals Lipid Accumulation in ME/CFS Cells

    57 shares
    Share 23 Tweet 14

About

We bring you the latest biotechnology news from best research centers and universities around the world. Check our website.

Follow us

Recent News

Engineering and Evaluating CRISPRi Gene Circuits in Plants

Limited Access to Essential Medicines in Eastern Uganda

How Acetyl Tributyl Citrate Affects Fracture Healing

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 73 other subscribers
  • Contact Us

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Homepages
    • Home Page 1
    • Home Page 2
  • News
  • National
  • Business
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Science

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.