• HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
Sunday, March 29, 2026
BIOENGINEER.ORG
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
No Result
View All Result
Bioengineer.org
No Result
View All Result
Home NEWS Science News Health

Patient shielding provides negligible benefits while increasing risks

Bioengineer by Bioengineer
April 8, 2019
in Health
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on RedditShare on Telegram

Leesburg, VA, April 8, 2019–A new study published in the April 2019 issue of the American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) makes the case for why it is time to abandon the practice of patient shielding in radiology.

The article, “Patient Shielding in Diagnostic Imaging: Discontinuing a Legacy Practice” reviews the historical rationale for patient shielding, and why the risks that come with patient shielding now outweigh what little benefit still exists, if any.

Patient shielding was first introduced as a regulation in 1976 and the wording has not changed since the initial version was released. The regulation was intended to protect from the hereditary risks of radiation exposure. However, as the authors note, no hereditary effects have been observed in humans in the four decades since the regulation was introduced.

The authors also point out that radiation doses have decreased significantly in recent decades thanks to advances in imaging technology. For instance, radiation doses to patients undergoing anteroposterior examinations of the pelvis have decreased more than 96% over the last 60 years. They also point out that as more imaging technologies rely on automatic exposure control, patient shields can lead to an increase in radiation doses and a decrease in image quality if they obstruct the field of view.

“Although the need to abandon this practice is clear, it is incumbent on health care professionals to help patients feel confident about the care they receive,” the authors said. “This is especially important regarding issues of radiation risk, for which misinformation is rampant. Consequently, how to address patient concerns as facilities stop providing patient shielding should be considered.”

###

Rebecca Milman Marsh, MD, one of the authors of the study, will discuss the article during an AJR Live Webinar on April 17, at 12 PM Eastern Time.

Founded in 1900, ARRS is the first and oldest radiology society in the United States, and is an international forum for progress in radiology. The Society’s mission is to improve health through a community committed to advancing knowledge and skills in radiology. ARRS achieves its mission through an annual scientific and educational meeting, publication of the American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) and InPractice magazine, topical symposia and webinars, and print and online educational materials. ARRS is located in Leesburg, VA.

Media Contact
Alycia Tessean
[email protected]

Related Journal Article

https://arrs.org/ARRSLIVE/Pressroom/PressReleases/patient_shielding_radiology_diagnostic_imaging_benefits.aspx
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.18.20508

Tags: Health Care Systems/ServicesHealth ProfessionalsMedicine/HealthPublic Health
Share13Tweet8Share2ShareShareShare2

Related Posts

Cutaneous Lesion Location: Key to Head Injury Risk?

March 27, 2026

Aversive Learning Hijacks Brain Sugar Sensor

March 25, 2026

Can Psychosocial Factors Influence Cancer Risk?

March 23, 2026

Depression Factors in Elderly: Pre vs. Post-COVID Analysis

March 23, 2026
Please login to join discussion

POPULAR NEWS

  • blank

    Revolutionary AI Model Enhances Precision in Detecting Food Contamination

    96 shares
    Share 38 Tweet 24
  • Imagine a Social Media Feed That Challenges Your Views Instead of Reinforcing Them

    1004 shares
    Share 397 Tweet 248
  • Uncovering Functions of Cavernous Malformation Proteins in Organoids

    54 shares
    Share 22 Tweet 14
  • Promising Outcomes from First Clinical Trials of Gene Regulation in Epilepsy

    51 shares
    Share 20 Tweet 13

About

We bring you the latest biotechnology news from best research centers and universities around the world. Check our website.

Follow us

Recent News

In-Sensor Cryptography Links Physical Process to Digital Identity

Can Psychosocial Factors Influence Cancer Risk?

Depression Factors in Elderly: Pre vs. Post-COVID Analysis

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Success! An email was just sent to confirm your subscription. Please find the email now and click 'Confirm' to start subscribing.

Join 78 other subscribers
  • Contact Us

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Homepages
    • Home Page 1
    • Home Page 2
  • News
  • National
  • Business
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Science

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.