In an innovative stride toward enhancing cancer care, researchers have initiated a groundbreaking protocol titled “Fit4Transplant,” aimed at optimizing exercise prehabilitation services for patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Recognized as a pivotal treatment for haematological cancers, HSCT often imposes severe physical challenges on patients, leading to lasting impairments in their physical functionality. This ambitious study seeks to refine and advance existing prehabilitation interventions by integrating cutting-edge adaptive trial designs and patient-centered co-design methods, potentially revolutionizing therapeutic support for these vulnerable patients.
The study centers on the iterative evaluation of two sequential intervention packages, each crafted to bolster patient resilience and recovery through tailored exercise programs. The first package targets healthcare providers through specialized staff training modules, emphasizing trauma-informed care approaches alongside strategies for delivering engaging, remote exercise classes. Complementing this, a behavior change booklet designed for patients aims to facilitate motivation and adherence, focusing on empowering individuals with actionable guidance to navigate their treatment journey.
Building upon initial insights, the second intervention package introduces a sophisticated digital component: an interactive self-management website and mobile application. This digital tool is designed to augment patient engagement by providing seamless access to personalized exercise regimens, progress tracking, and supportive resources, thereby integrating technology-driven solutions with traditional therapeutic frameworks. The adaptive nature of this phase allows for incremental refinements based on empirical data and stakeholder feedback, demonstrating an agile approach to healthcare innovation.
Central to the methodology is the application of sequential single-arm Bayesian optimal phase II adaptive trials, a rigorous and flexible statistical design that enables continuous assessment and modification of the intervention’s effectiveness and acceptability. The trial protocol specifies interim analyses after every 30 participants complete post-intervention assessments, with clear efficacy benchmarks guiding decisions on whether to continue, modify, or discontinue the interventions. This dynamic framework ensures that resources are efficiently utilized while maximizing participant benefit and scientific insight.
Baseline and post-intervention outcome measurements encompass comprehensive evaluations of physical function, psychological well-being, and overall health status. By employing a composite criterion for promising response, the study captures multifaceted dimensions of patient outcomes, reflecting real-world complexities. Importantly, if the interventions fail to meet pre-defined thresholds—specifically, if 11 or more participants do not exhibit promising responses—the study protocol mandates early termination, safeguarding against ineffective treatments.
To enrich quantitative findings, a qualitative sub-study invites a subset of participants to engage in in-depth interviews exploring their experiences with the intervention packages. This qualitative dimension allows researchers to capture nuanced perspectives on the delivery, accessibility, and perceived value of the prehabilitation services. Such mixed methods integration exemplifies contemporary clinical research paradigms aiming to holistically understand patient and provider experiences.
The timing of recruitment, slated to begin in February 2025, reflects the study team’s readiness to proceed with robust data collection and intervention delivery. The registration of the trial with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12624000363583p) underscores the study’s commitment to transparency and methodological rigor, aligning with global standards in clinical research governance.
One of the study’s hallmark innovations lies in blending co-design principles with advanced adaptive trial methodology. Co-design involves collaborative engagement of patients, clinicians, and other stakeholders throughout the intervention development process, fostering programs that resonate with end-user needs and preferences. This participatory model enhances intervention relevance, feasibility, and sustainability, potentially setting a new standard for designing behavioral health interventions.
The exercise regimens formulated within this protocol are poised to mitigate the deleterious effects of HSCT, which frequently induces prolonged fatigue, muscular weakness, and reductions in cardiorespiratory capacity. By instituting prehabilitation—targeted exercise prior to treatment—patients may enter transplantation in improved physical condition, thereby enhancing treatment tolerance and post-transplant recovery trajectories.
Technological incorporation through the digital platform marks a pivotal advancement. The self-management application not only facilitates real-time feedback and adherence monitoring but also empowers patients with self-efficacy tools, fostering autonomy in managing their health. Such digital interventions are emblematic of precision medicine’s move toward individualized, technology-enhanced care models with potential scalability across diverse clinical settings.
Furthermore, the Bayesian adaptive design optimizes trial efficiency by prioritizing participant safety and resource allocation. Unlike traditional fixed designs, this approach adapts to accumulating data, allowing the research team to identify effective interventions more swiftly or discontinue futile ones, thereby accelerating the translation of research findings into clinical practice.
Critically, the trauma-informed staff training module reflects a growing awareness of the psychological dimensions of cancer care. By sensitizing healthcare providers to the emotional and physical trauma associated with transplantation and intensive treatments, the protocol seeks to create supportive environments that facilitate patient engagement and well-being, broadening the scope beyond purely physical interventions.
The integration of behavior change theory into patient materials reflects an understanding that enduring lifestyle modifications require more than mere instruction. The behavior change booklet employs evidence-based strategies to foster motivation, goal-setting, and self-monitoring, essential components for sustaining exercise habits amid the challenges posed by cancer treatments.
The anticipated outcomes of this trial extend beyond immediate clinical benefits. Success in this initiative could inform the design of future prehabilitation programs globally, fostering a paradigm shift in supportive cancer care. Moreover, this study illustrates a scalable model for incorporating co-design and adaptive methodologies within real-world healthcare settings, potentially transforming behavioral intervention development across medical disciplines.
As the healthcare community eagerly awaits the trial’s commencement, the Fit4Transplant protocol encapsulates a forward-thinking, multidisciplinary approach to cancer care innovation. It exemplifies how strategic integration of technology, behavioral science, and adaptive clinical research can pave the way for interventions that are not only effective but also patient-centered and responsive to the complexities of treatment journeys.
In sum, this protocol heralds a promising new chapter in combatting the debilitating impacts of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation through exercise prehabilitation. With its methodological sophistication and commitment to co-design, Fit4Transplant may well establish a blueprint for future interventions aimed at enhancing recovery and quality of life for cancer patients worldwide.
Subject of Research: Exercise prehabilitation for haematological cancer patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, using adaptive clinical trial designs and co-designed intervention development.
Article Title: Protocol for Fit4Transplant: iterative optimisation of an exercise prehabilitation service for haematological cancer patients using phase II adaptive trials and co-design
Article References:
Short, C.E., Edbrooke, L., Abo, S. et al. Protocol for Fit4Transplant: iterative optimisation of an exercise prehabilitation service for haematological cancer patients using phase II adaptive trials and co-design. BMC Cancer 25, 1690 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-15027-6
Image Credits: Scienmag.com
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-15027-6
Tags: behavior change strategies in healthdigital tools for cancer recoveryempowering cancer patients through exerciseexercise prehabilitation for blood cancerFit4Transplant protocolhematopoietic stem cell transplantationpatient-centered co-design methodspersonalized exercise programs for cancer patientsremote exercise classes for cancer patientsresilience building in hematological cancer caretechnology integration in cancer rehabilitationtrauma-informed care in cancer treatment
