Spatial biology has been having its breakout decade. Technologies such as imaging mass cytometry, multiplexed immunofluorescence and other multiplexed imaging platforms now allow researchers to measure dozens of biomolecules simultaneously while keeping every cell locked in its original position within a tissue section. The result is datasets of extraordinary richness: millions of cells, each carrying a high-dimensional molecular profile and a pair of spatial coordinates that anchor it to a specific spot on the image. Yet a persistent bottleneck has quietly frustrated laboratories around the world. Once the data are generated, actually selecting the cells you want to study — by hand, by location, by intuition — has remained awkward, code-heavy and largely unsupported by existing software.
A team of Austrian researchers believes they have a practical answer. In a study published in BMC Bioinformatics, Markus Steiner, Stephan Drothler, Jan P. Höpner, Roland Geisberger and Nadja Zaborsky, based at Paracelsus Medical University, the Salzburg Cancer Research Institute and Paris-Lodron University Salzburg, introduce Spatialgater, an open, web-based tool built in R Shiny that lets scientists select individual cells directly on a zoomable image of their tissue. Rather than forcing analysts to write custom scripts every time they want to isolate, say, a cluster of immune cells sitting at the edge of a tumor nest, Spatialgater allows them to draw polygon gates around cells of interest with a few clicks of a mouse — in situ, exactly where the cells actually live.
The problem the tool addresses is rooted in how spatial omics data are currently processed. The dominant data structure in the R ecosystem for this kind of work is the SpatialExperiment class, a container that stores molecular expression measurements alongside the spatial coordinates of each cell. Standard analysis workflows built on this framework typically proceed by clustering cells according to their expression of biomolecules — proteins, transcripts or other markers — and then subsetting or annotating cells based on those molecular groupings. What these workflows largely ignore is geography. A tumor cell and its lookalike elsewhere on the slide may share nearly identical expression profiles, yet occupy radically different microenvironments, one nestled against a blood vessel, the other buried in dense stroma. Clustering alone cannot tell them apart by location.
Computational biologists have developed patch-detection and neighborhood-analysis methods that identify recurring spatial patterns, such as regions where particular cell types consistently co-occur. These approaches are powerful for systematic surveys of tissue architecture, but they are fundamentally automated and population-level. None of them gives a researcher the simple, immediate ability to say: show me these cells, right here, and let me select exactly the ones I mean. That gap matters in practice. Pathologists and immunologists often spot something visually striking — an unusual accumulation of T cells at an invasive margin, a suspicious ring of macrophages around a necrotic core — and want to interrogate those specific cells without writing bespoke code or approximating their region of interest with crude coordinate filters.
Spatialgater fills that gap with a deliberately simple interface. The tool renders cells as dots overlaid on a zoomable image of the tissue, so users can navigate the sample much as they would navigate a digital slide under a microscope. Drawing a polygon directly on the image selects every cell whose coordinates fall inside the drawn boundary. The selection is fully interactive: researchers can zoom in to single-cell resolution, refine a gate, add additional polygons and inspect the molecular profiles of the cells they have captured. Because the tool operates on SpatialExperiment objects, it slots naturally into existing R-based spatial omics pipelines rather than requiring researchers to export their data into an unfamiliar format.
Two features elevate the tool beyond a simple lasso. The first is an integrated k-nearest-neighbor function that can automatically extend a manually drawn gate across spatially similar microenvironments elsewhere in the tissue. If a researcher delineates a distinctive cellular neighborhood in one region, the algorithm can propagate that selection to comparable regions, dramatically reducing the manual labor of annotating large tissue sections while keeping the human judgment that defined the original gate. The second is traceability. Every polygon a user draws is recorded in a log file, creating an auditable record of exactly how each selection was made — a small but significant safeguard for reproducibility in a field where manual choices have traditionally gone undocumented.
Export and integration are equally considered. Selected cell identifiers can be written out as a standard CSV file for use in any downstream software, or saved directly back into the original SpatialExperiment object as a new logical column, meaning manual selections become first-class citizens in subsequent statistical analyses. This design choice reflects the authors’ core motivation: boosting interactivity while reducing the programming burden of image analysis. A researcher no longer needs to be a fluent R programmer to translate a visual observation into a computable cell set; the web interface handles the translation.
To demonstrate the tool in action, the team applied Spatialgater to a publicly available imaging mass cytometry dataset of breast cancer tissue, using it to characterize and compare T cells according to their spatial location within the tumor microenvironment. The demonstration speaks directly to one of the hottest questions in cancer immunology: how the precise positioning of immune cells — whether T cells are excluded from tumor nests, patrolling the invasive margin or dispersed through stroma — shapes antitumor immunity and predicts response to immunotherapy. A tool that makes spatially targeted cell selection fast and intuitive could accelerate exactly this kind of location-dependent immune analysis. The team also validated the package’s gating functionality using test data derived from a wild-type mouse, with the animal work approved by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Education, Science, and Research under approval number BMBWF 2023-0.644.528.
The significance of the work may lie less in any single algorithm than in what it signals about the maturing of spatial omics. The field’s first generation of tools focused on generating and processing data; the next generation is about making those data genuinely explorable by working biologists. By lowering the barrier between seeing something interesting in a tissue image and acting on it computationally, Spatialgater embodies a broader shift toward interactive, human-in-the-loop bioinformatics. The software is open access, published under a Creative Commons Attribution license, and funded by the Austrian Science Fund, WISS 2025 through the Cancer Cluster Salzburg, and the Province of Salzburg. For laboratories drowning in multiplexed images and struggling to connect visual insight with computational rigor, a free browser-based gate-drawing tool may prove to be one of those deceptively simple additions that changes daily practice.
Subject of Research: An interactive R Shiny web tool for spatially selecting and gating individual cells in spatial omics datasets.
Article Title: Spatialgater: an R Shiny webtool for in situ gating of cells in spatial omics experiments
Article References: Steiner, M., Drothler, S., Höpner, J. P., Geisberger, R., & Zaborsky, N. (2026). Spatialgater: an R Shiny webtool for in situ gating of cells in spatial omics experiments. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-026-06620-y
Image Credits: AI Generated
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-026-06620-y
Keywords: Spatialgater, R Shiny, spatial omics, single cell gating, imaging mass cytometry, SpatialExperiment, multiplexed imaging, breast cancer, T cells, tumor microenvironment, bioinformatics software, Shiny
Cite Scienmag News
APA
MLA
Chicago
Vincent Franklin. (September 12, 2026). New Web Tool Lets Researchers Hand-Pick Cells Directly on Spatial Omics Images. Scienmag. https://scienmag.com/new-web-tool-lets-researchers-hand-pick-cells-directly-on-spatial-omics-images/
Vincent Franklin. “New Web Tool Lets Researchers Hand-Pick Cells Directly on Spatial Omics Images.” Scienmag, 12 September 2026, https://scienmag.com/new-web-tool-lets-researchers-hand-pick-cells-directly-on-spatial-omics-images/. Accessed 12 September 2026.
Vincent Franklin. “New Web Tool Lets Researchers Hand-Pick Cells Directly on Spatial Omics Images.” Scienmag. September 12, 2026. https://scienmag.com/new-web-tool-lets-researchers-hand-pick-cells-directly-on-spatial-omics-images/
Copy citation
Download RIS
Tags: bioinformatics softwarebreast cancercell selection in tissue imagingcell-specific data extractionhigh-dimensional molecular profilingimaging mass cytometryimaging mass cytometry toolsmultiplexed imagingmultiplexed immunofluorescence visualizationopen-source spatial biology platformR ShinyR Shiny applications for biologyShinysingle cell gatingspatial omicsspatial omics data analysisSpatialExperimentSpatialgaterT Cellstissue image zoom and selectiontissue section spatial coordinatestumor microenvironmentuser-friendly bioinformatics softwareweb-based spatial biology tools
