Deep in the cattle country of Papua New Guinea, researchers set out to answer a deceptively simple question: is one of the world’s most widespread zoonotic diseases lurking in the nation’s livestock? What they uncovered was a tale of two very different animals. The cattle—212 of them, sampled across nine farms and abattoirs in two provinces—came back entirely clean. But in the rats prowling the feed stores and paddocks of a university cattle farm, the pathogen was very much alive. Writing in the open-access journal Discover Animals, Sinafa Robby of the Papua New Guinea University of Technology, with Stephanie Tringin of the PNG University of Natural Resources and Environment and Macquin Maino of PNG Unitech, reports the country’s first molecular survey of Leptospira, the corkscrew-shaped bacterium behind leptospirosis, in cattle and rodents. The team detected and genetically characterized Leptospira interrogans—the most notorious pathogenic species in the genus—in 12.5 percent of the rats trapped at the university farm in Morobe Province, while every bovine sample, from kidney and blood to urine, tested negative. That stark contrast, the authors argue, carries a warning for the people who work these fields every day.
Leptospirosis is one of the most broadly distributed zoonotic diseases on the planet, yet it remains poorly documented in Papua New Guinea, where published research on the strains actually circulating in the country is scarce. The disease is caused by spirochaete bacteria of the genus Leptospira—exceptionally thin, helical microbes fitted with internal flagella that allow them to screw their way through viscous fluids and anchor themselves in host tissue. More than 300 serovars have been identified over decades of microscopy and serological testing with tools such as the microscopic agglutination test and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, while DNA-based methods have so far distinguished 22 distinct species. Pathogenic and non-pathogenic members of the genus circulate across geographical regions, driving wide variation in how severe infections become. Among cattle, the most consequential strains include Leptospira borgpetersenii serovar Hardjobovis and Leptospira pomona, which are blamed for abortion, neonatal deaths, weak calves and substantial production losses on dairy and beef farms worldwide. Cattle farming itself is no small matter in PNG: it contributes roughly 15 percent of the national livestock subsector and sustains the livelihoods of both commercial operators and smallholder farmers.
Because no molecular investigation of Leptospira in PNG cattle had ever been attempted, the team designed a cross-sectional survey running from January to March 2024 across commercial and smallholder operations in Morobe Province and East New Britain Province. Purposive sampling targeted accessible farms and abattoirs, with animal health officers from the National Agriculture Quarantine and Inspection Authority assisting aseptic collection. In total, the researchers gathered 228 biological samples from nine sites: 150 kidney samples from vaccinated commercial cattle slaughtered at the Ramu Abattoir, 10 kidney samples from non-vaccinated cattle at the PNG University of Natural Resources and Environment abattoir, and material from live animals at the PNG University of Technology farm in Lae, where 10 blood samples were drawn from the tail vein and roughly 60 millilitres of urine was collected from each of 42 cattle. Six non-vaccinated smallholder farms in the Markham Valley, including Agro Venture Limited, Trukai Farms and DAL Warwin, each contributed six urine samples. To probe the wildlife side of the transmission cycle, the team laid cage and glue traps around the university farm over 14 nights and collected 16 rat kidneys, preserved individually in ethanol for the trip to the laboratory.
At the Biotechnology Centre in Lae, the samples underwent a molecular workout. Kidney tissue preserved in 70 percent ethanol was air-dried before processing, and about 25 milligrams of tissue—together with 100-microlitre aliquots of blood and urine—was run through a commercial DNA extraction kit whose wash steps strip out residual ethanol, a notorious inhibitor of the polymerase chain reaction. Spectrophotometry confirmed clean extracts, with absorbance ratios between 1.8 and 2.0. The team then screened every sample by conventional PCR using two primer sets: one targeting the secY gene, a marker for pathogenic Leptospira, and another targeting the rrs gene, which encodes 16S ribosomal RNA and can flag both pathogenic and non-pathogenic relatives. Each reaction mixed primers at 0.4 micromolar with half a unit of Taq polymerase, then cycled 35 times through denaturation at 94 degrees Celsius, annealing at 58 degrees and extension at 72 degrees. Products were resolved on 2 percent agarose gels, where positives were expected as bands of 549 and 525 base pairs. With no positive control available in the laboratory, every candidate band was sent for Sanger sequencing at an accredited facility in Singapore and verified against the NCBI nucleotide database using BLAST.
The results drew a sharp line between the two host groups. All 212 cattle samples—kidneys from both the vaccinated Ramu cattle and the non-vaccinated East New Britain animals, plus every blood and urine specimen—tested negative for Leptospira DNA. The rats told another story. Two of the 16 rodent kidney samples, both collected at the PNG University of Technology farm, amplified successfully, giving the rodents a positivity rate of 12.5 percent and the full 228-sample dataset an overall rate of just 0.88 percent. Curiously, the secY amplicons measured roughly 354 base pairs rather than the 549 the primers were designed to produce. The authors attribute the shortfall to strain-specific genomic variation or to alternative primer binding inside the target gene—phenomena well documented in leptospiral diagnostics that can yield correctly amplified but shorter products. Because PCR alone could not settle the identity of the organism, the positive products were sequenced and searched against the nucleotide collection, and the resulting sequences fed into phylogenetic trees built with 100 bootstrap replicates to test the reliability of every branching pattern.
The genetic evidence left little doubt about what was living in those rat kidneys. Both isolates matched Leptospira interrogans isolate P1D297, and the phylogenetic analysis placed them within a cluster of uncultured Leptospira sequences held in international databases. The PNG rat isolates showed very high similarity—bootstrap support above 95 percent—to isolates labelled NRW30, NRW31, NRW54, NRW73 and NRW72; high similarity, between 85 and 95 percent, to isolates LJR051, NRW24, NRW66 and LJR028; and moderate similarity, between 70 and 85 percent, to Leptospira interrogans strain MORU L1207. The dominance of uncultured isolates among the closest matches is telling in its own right: Leptospira is notoriously difficult to grow in the laboratory, demanding specialised media and long incubation, so many strains known to science exist only as DNA recovered directly from clinical or environmental samples. The close kinship between the PNG strains and globally distributed environmental isolates, the authors suggest, hints that these pathogenic lineages share common ancestral roots with leptospires detected far beyond the Pacific, a signature of potentially wide geographic dispersal.
Interpreting the all-clear on the cattle demanded as much care as the positive rat result. Serological surveys conducted years earlier in PNG had detected antibodies against Leptospira in ruminants, but those tests register immune memory—to past infections, or even to vaccines—whereas PCR registers the bacterium itself. Vaccination may partly explain the pattern: the Ramu cattle were routinely vaccinated against leptospirosis, a practice known to reduce bacterial circulation and urinary shedding and thus narrow the window in which DNA can be caught. Yet the non-vaccinated farms were also negative, pointing to other forces. Leptospiral bacteraemia is brief and confined to the acute phase of infection; urinary shedding is intermittent even in chronically infected animals; and conventional PCR for leptospirosis carries a reported sensitivity of only about 56 to 62 percent, meaning low bacterial loads or degraded DNA can slip past detection. Wet-season sampling may even work against the assay, diluting leptospires in urine rather than concentrating them. The strongest argument, the authors note, is that kidney—the bacterium’s preferred sanctuary, where it colonises the renal tubules—still came back negative in abattoir cattle, supporting the conclusion that the herds were not actively infected at the time of sampling.
The exclusive detection of the pathogen in rats reinforces their established role as maintenance hosts of leptospirosis. Rodents tolerate chronic infection and shed bacteria continuously in their urine, seeding soil and standing water with organisms that persist for weeks in warm, wet conditions. On a cattle farm, that contamination creates ready transmission pathways—through drinking water, feed stores and shared paddocks—to incidental hosts such as livestock and people. The implications reach well beyond the herd. Farm workers, veterinarians and livestock handlers at facilities harbouring infected rodents risk exposure through contact with contaminated environments, and domestic animals such as dogs and pigs sharing the same ground can act as intermediate or amplifying hosts, widening the zoonotic loop further. This is leptospirosis operating as the textbook example of a One Health disease, a zoonosis playing out at the junction of animal, human and environmental health. The authors argue that only surveillance which monitors multiple host species and the shared environment simultaneously can realistically map and manage transmission across PNG’s agricultural landscapes.
The study also marks a milestone in the country’s sparse leptospirosis record. It is the second molecular confirmation of Leptospira diversity in PNG rodents, following a 2022 survey of bats and rats, and the first such documentation in Morobe Province specifically. The sequences generated in Lae now feed into international databases, sharpening the global picture of Leptospira diversity while giving national authorities a molecular reference point for future surveillance. The findings also translate into a concrete checklist for the university farm and similar facilities: secure feed storage against rodent intrusion, clear away debris piles and unused equipment that provide harborage, run regular rodent population monitoring, and equip workers who handle animals or move through potentially contaminated ground with gloves and boots. Integrated pest management, the authors stress, is not mere housekeeping but a frontline public health measure, because reducing rodent numbers and severing contact between livestock and rodent habitats directly lowers the risk of spillover to animals and humans alike.
Even with zero positives in the cattle, the researchers treat the survey as a foundation rather than a failure. The standardized protocols, the negative screening across nine sites and the two characterized isolates now constitute the first molecular baseline for leptospirosis in PNG cattle systems, and they set the stage for the multi-site, multi-season investigations—with statistically determined sample sizes—that the authors say are needed to track how rainfall, farm management and rodent ecology shape the bacterium’s movement across the country’s agricultural landscapes. For now, the two positive rat kidneys carry the study’s central message: in the fields of Morobe Province, the threat is not sweeping through the herd. It is scurrying quietly among the rodents, waiting for a chance to cross.
Subject of Research: Molecular detection and genetic characterization of Leptospira spp. in cattle and rodent populations in Papua New Guinea
Subject of Research: Biology
Article Title: Molecular screening and characterization of Leptospira spp. in cattle and rodent populations in Morobe and East New Britain Provinces, Papua New Guinea
Article References: Robby, S., Tringin, S., & Maino, M. (2026). Molecular screening and characterization of Leptospira spp. in cattle and rodent populations in Morobe and East New Britain Provinces, Papua New Guinea. Discover Animals, 3(1), Article 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44338-026-00187-x
Image Credits: AI Generated
DOI: 10.1007/s44338-026-00187-x
Keywords: Leptospirosis, Leptospira interrogans, Molecular detection, PCR, Rodent reservoirs, Cattle, Zoonotic disease, One Health, Phylogenetic analysis, Papua New Guinea
Cite Scienmag News
APA MLA Chicago
William Thompson. (August 31, 2026). Leptospira bacteria detected in cattle and rodents across Papua New Guinea provinces. Scienmag. https://scienmag.com/leptospira-bacteria-detected-in-cattle-and-rodents-across-papua-new-guinea-provinces/
William Thompson. “Leptospira bacteria detected in cattle and rodents across Papua New Guinea provinces.” Scienmag, 31 August 2026, https://scienmag.com/leptospira-bacteria-detected-in-cattle-and-rodents-across-papua-new-guinea-provinces/. Accessed 31 August 2026.
William Thompson. “Leptospira bacteria detected in cattle and rodents across Papua New Guinea provinces.” Scienmag. August 31, 2026. https://scienmag.com/leptospira-bacteria-detected-in-cattle-and-rodents-across-papua-new-guinea-provinces/
Copy citation Download RIS
Tags: absence of Leptospira in cattle in PNGanimalbacterial contamination in feed stores anddetection of leptospira in feed stores and livestock environmentsdetection of pathogenic Leptospira speciesepidemiology of leptospirosis in tropical regionsgenetic characterization of Leptospira in rodentsgenetic characterization of pathogenic Leptospira strainsLeptospira bacteria in Papua New Guinea livestock and rodentsleptospirosis epidemiology in livestock and rodentsleptospirosis risk factors in cattle farmsmolecular survey of Leptospira interrogans in rodentsprevalence of Leptospira in rodents versus cattlepublic health implications of leptospira in PNGpublic health implications of leptospirosis in Papua New Guineazoonotic disease spread in Papua New Guineazoonotic disease transmission in agriculturezoonotic leptospirosis transmission risk
