A neuromagnetic view through the skull

The processing of information inside the brain is one of the body’s most complex processes. Disruption of this processing often leads to severe neurological disorders. The study of signal transmission inside the brain is therefore key to understanding a myriad of diseases. From a methodological point of view, however, it creates major challenges for researchers. The desire to observe the brain’s nerve cells operating ‘at the speed of thought’, but without the need to place electrodes inside the brain, has led to the emergence of two techniques featuring high temporal resolution: electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG). Both methods enable the visualization of brain activity from outside the skull. However, while results for slow currents are reliable, those for fast currents are not.

Slow currents – known as postsynaptic potentials – occur when signals created by one nerve cell are received by another. The subsequent firing of impulses (which transmit information to downstream neurons or muscles) produces fast currents which last for just a millisecond. These are known as action potentials. “Until now, we have only been able to observe nerve cells as they receive information, not as they transmit information in response to a single sensory stimulus,” explains Dr. Gunnar Waterstraat of Charité’s Department of Neurology with Experimental Neurology on Campus Benjamin Franklin. “One could say that we were effectively blind in one eye.” Working under the leadership of Dr. Waterstraat and Dr. Rainer Körber from the PTB, a team of researchers has now laid the foundations which are needed to change this. The interdisciplinary research group succeeded in rendering the MEG technology so sensitive as to enable it to detect even fast brain oscillations produced in response to a single sensory stimulus.

They did this by significantly reducing the system noise produced by the MEG device itself. “The magnetic field sensors inside the MEG device are submerged in liquid helium, to cool them to -269°C (4.2 K),” explains Dr. Körber. He adds: “To do this, the cooling system requires complex thermal insulation. This superinsulation consists of aluminum-coated foils which produce magnetic noise and will therefore mask small magnetic fields such as those associated with nerve cells. We have now changed the design of the superinsulation in such a way as to ensure this noise is no longer measurable. By doing this, we managed to increase the MEG technology’s sensitivity by a factor of ten.”

The researchers used the example of stimulating a nerve in the arm to demonstrate that the new device is indeed capable of recording fast brain waves. As part of their study on four healthy subjects, the researchers applied electrical stimulation to a specific nerve at the wrist whilst at the same time positioning the MEG sensor immediately above the area of the brain which is responsible for processing sensory stimuli applied to the hand. To eliminate outside sources of interference such as electric networks and electronic components, the measurements were conducted in one of the PTB’s shielded recording rooms. The researchers found that, by doing so, they were able to measure the action potentials produced by a small group of simultaneously activated neurons in the brain’s cortex in response to individual stimuli. “For the first time, a noninvasive approach enabled us to observe nerve cells in the brain sending information in response to a single sensory stimulus,” says Dr. Waterstraat. He continues: “One interesting observation was the fact that these fast brain oscillations are not uniform in nature but change with each stimulus. These changes also occurred independently of the slow brain signals. There is enormous variability in how the brain processes information about the touch of a hand, despite all of the stimuli applied being identical.”

The fact that the researchers are now able to compare individual responses to stimuli opens the way for neurology researchers to investigate questions which previously remained unanswered: To what extent do factors such as alertness and tiredness influence the processing of information in the brain? What about additional stimuli which are received at the same time? The highly sensitive MEG system could also help scientists to develop a deeper understanding of, and better treatments for, neurological disorders. Epilepsy and Parkinson’s disease are examples of disorders which are linked to disruptions in fast brain signaling. “Thanks to this optimized MEG technology, our neuroscience toolbox has gained a crucial new tool which enables us to address all of these questions noninvasively,” says Dr. Waterstraat.

###

*Waterstraat G, Körber R et al. Noninvasive neuromagnetic single-trial analysis of human neocortical population spikes. PNAS 2021. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2017401118

Like all other electrical currents, brain activity generates magnetic fields. The brain’s magnetic field, however, is approximately one billion times weaker than the Earth’s magnetic field and measures at just a few femtotesla. Magnetoencephalography is used to measure the neuromagnetic signals produced when the brain’s electrical impulses move inside or between cells. Measuring the brain’s magnetic field in this manner requires the use of superconducting quantum interference devices – or SQUID sensors.

Contact at Charité:

Dr. Gunnar Waterstraat

Neurophysics Group (AG Neurophysik)

Department of Neurology with Experimental Neurology

Campus Benjamin Franklin

Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin

Tel: +49 30 8445 4703

Email: [email protected]

Contact at PTB:

Dr. Rainer Körber

Head of WorkingGroup 8.25 Ultra-Low Field MR Imaging

Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB)

Tel: +49 30 3481-7576

Email: [email protected]