Credit: Credit: Forest Isbell.
Decades after farmland was abandoned, plant biodiversity and productivity struggle to recover, according to new University of Minnesota research.
Published in the journal Nature Ecology & Evolution, researchers examined 37 years of data tied to plant biodiversity (i.e., number of different species) and plant productivity (i.e., biomass or amount of plants) related to 21 grasslands and savannas in Minnesota. Most of these fields had been ploughed and abandoned for agricultural use between one and 91 years prior.
Researchers then compared the plots to nearby land that has not been significantly impacted by human activity.
The study found that:
- local grassland plant diversity increased significantly over time, but incompletely recovered, and plant productivity did not significantly recover;
- one year after abandonment, the fields had, on average, 38% of the plant diversity and 34% of the plant productivity for the land that was never ploughed;
- 91 years after abandonment, the fields had 73% of the plant diversity and 53% of the plant productivity.
“When taken at a global scale, fossil records indicate plant species are going extinct at rates hundreds of times faster than the natural extinction rate,” said Forest Isbell, assistant professor in the College of Biological Sciences (CBS) and co-author on this study. “At this localized level, we’re seeing how human activity can impact the loss of species.”
Researchers suggest that the slow and incomplete recovery of species on abandoned farmland in Minnesota is likely happening in ecosystems around the world where land has been cleared for agriculture, logging or other human activities.
“The amount of land being used for agricultural purposes has slowly been decreasing, leaving some 11 million square miles of old fields and recovering forests across our planet,” said Adam Clark, study co-author and CBS graduate who is currently a postdoctoral researcher with the Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research at the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research. “In these spaces, active restoration efforts may often be needed to restore biodiversity and prevent the extinction of species.”
Restoration tactics can include using prescribed burns, dispersing seeds, using haying to remove nutrients added through fertilization and reintroducing others in the food chain (e.g., herbivores, predators) pushed out of the area.
“This is an unprecedented opportunity for us — humans as species — to restore ecosystems and help mitigate the threat extinctions could have on our planet and our own well-being,” said Isbell, an expert in biodiversity, as well as ecosystem functioning, stability and services.
CBS Professor David Tilman and College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Professor Peter Reich also co-authored this paper.
Funding was provided by the U.S. National Science Foundation’s (NSF) Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) program (DEB-1831944), the LTER Network Communications Office (DEB-1545288) and an NSF Career award (DEB-1845334).
University of Minnesota Public Relations
Related Journal Article