The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) in recruitment processes raises pivotal questions regarding its impact on organizational attraction and applicants’ intent to apply. A revolutionary study by Babaee and Shank intricately examines this dynamic, revealing how trust and procedural justice serve as mediators within the AI hiring landscape. Their findings shed light on the dual mechanisms through which AI influences potential employees, thus offering valuable insights for organizations increasingly leaning on this technology.
In today’s competitive job market, companies are dedicating significant resources to enhance their hiring processes. The integration of AI technologies promises efficiency and fairness, yet the actual reception from potential candidates can vary greatly. Babaee and Shank’s research provides a comprehensive exploration of how AI systems, when viewed through the lens of trust and fairness, can either positively or negatively influence candidates’ perceptions of an organization.
The concept of trust stands at the forefront of the relationship between job seekers and AI hiring practices. Candidates are likely to evaluate the reliability of the AI systems employed during the recruitment process. If candidates harbor doubts regarding the algorithms used, or if they perceive the technology as lacking transparency, their trust in the hiring process diminishes. Consequently, low levels of trust can deter individuals from applying, substantially impacting an organization’s ability to attract top talent.
On the other hand, procedural justice plays a pivotal role in shaping candidates’ experiences during recruitment. This refers to the perceived fairness of the processes involved in hiring, including clarity, consistency, and the opportunity for candidates to provide feedback. Babaee and Shank highlight that organizations that emphasize procedural justice in their AI-driven hiring processes can significantly enhance applicants’ perceptions of fairness, thereby increasing both organizational attraction and intentions to apply. This suggests that the implementation of AI must be meticulously managed to ensure fairness and transparency, particularly through well-structured processes that foster candidate engagement.
As these two concepts—trust and procedural justice—intertwine, they create a formidable framework for understanding the effect of AI hiring on candidates. The research illustrates that organizations that cultivate a reputation for transparent and just practices can improve their standing among potential applicants, ultimately aiding in the recruitment of a diverse and competent workforce. The authors argue that organizations need to focus not merely on the technical efficiency of AI systems but also on the human aspects of hiring, which involve ongoing communication and stakeholder involvement.
The essence of procedural justice lies in the engagement with applicants throughout the recruitment journey. Organizations that offer clear information on AI criteria and give candidates an idea of what to expect in the hiring process can foster a sense of inclusion and respect. By making candidates feel valued, organizations build a robust reputation that further amplifies their attractiveness to potential hires.
Moreover, the study indicates that the quality of AI systems themselves significantly influences candidates’ perceptions of both trust and procedural justice. Well-developed AI systems that regularly undergo evaluations can produce fairer results, reinforcing candidates’ beliefs in the organization’s integrity. Consequently, if an organization is committed to implementing ethical AI practices—one that prioritizes fairness and transparency—candidates are more likely to perceive positive outcomes, thereby enhancing their intent to apply.
However, the potential pitfalls of implementing AI in hiring must not be disregarded. Misguided algorithm designs, biased datasets, and operational opacity can lead to significant repercussions, thus emphasizing the necessity for ongoing monitoring and reform. Babaee and Shank stress the importance of continuous improvement and stakeholder engagement in shaping AI technologies. Innovation in hiring, while useful, must also be adhered to ethical guidelines meant to safeguard fairness and equality.
Equally, organizations are advised to invest in training programs designed explicitly to raise awareness about the implications of using AI in recruitment among their employees. By instilling a culture that values ethical considerations in related technologies, employers can align their hiring practices with broader societal values, which ultimately aids in building candidate trust.
In conclusion, as businesses harness the capabilities of artificial intelligence in recruitment, focusing on both trust and procedural justice is paramount. Babaee and Shank’s work articulates the delicate balance needed between technological advancement and ethical commitments to ensure that the hiring processes remain inclusive and equitable.
In summary, the study’s implications extend beyond simply attracting potential candidates. They suggest that the treatment of applicants within the hiring process can define a company’s reputation and identity. For organizations navigating the modern hiring landscape, the answers do not solely rely on the sophistication of AI systems, but rather how they are integrated into culturally sensitive, fair, and transparent recruitment practices.
Ultimately, the fusion of AI hiring capabilities with robust frameworks of trust and procedural justice presents an opportunity for organizations to revolutionize their talent acquisition strategies. As future research unfolds, it will become increasingly apparent how these dynamics evolve and how businesses can adapt their recruitment methodologies to maintain relevance in an ever-changing labor market.
The findings presented by Babaee and Shank not only provide a roadmap for enhancing organizational attraction but also lay the groundwork for future explorations into the ethical deployment of AI in recruitment practices.
Subject of Research: The impact of AI hiring practices on organizational attraction and applicants’ intent to apply, mediated by trust and procedural justice.
Article Title: Trust and procedural justice mediate the effects of AI hiring on organizational attraction and intent to apply.
Article References: Babaee, A., Shank, D.B. Trust and procedural justice mediate the effects of AI hiring on organizational attraction and intent to apply. Discov Artif Intell 5, 375 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00633-x
Image Credits: AI Generated
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00633-x
Keywords: AI hiring, organizational attraction, trust, procedural justice, recruitment processes.
Tags: AI in recruitmentAI technology in human resourcescandidate intent to apply with AIcandidate perceptions of AIefficiency of AI hiring systemsfairness in recruitment processesimpact of AI on job applicantsorganizational attraction in job marketprocedural justice in hiringtransparency in hiring algorithmstrust and justice in recruitmenttrust in AI hiring
