• HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
Thursday, November 27, 2025
BIOENGINEER.ORG
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
No Result
View All Result
Bioengineer.org
No Result
View All Result
Home NEWS Science News Health

COVID: women are less likely to put themselves in danger

Bioengineer by Bioengineer
October 16, 2020
in Health
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0
IMAGE
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on RedditShare on Telegram

Women’s attitudes and behaviors may have contributed to their reduced vulnerability and mortality. A survey in 8 countries shows they consider Coronavirus a more serious problem than men and are more likely to approve and comply with health policies

IMAGE

Credit: Paolo Tonato

The increased adherence of women to Coronavirus policies may be one of the reasons for the lower vulnerability and mortality that they experienced, compared to men, in the early phase of the epidemic. “Policy makers who promote a new normality made of reduced mobility, face masks and other behavioral changes,” says Vincenzo Galasso, one of the authors of a new study on gender differences in the reaction to COVID-19, “should, therefore, design a gender-differentiated communication if they want to increase the compliance of men.”

Two of the authors of the research, which appeared on PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences) are scholars of Bocconi University, Vincenzo Galasso and Paola Profeta, affiliated to Bocconi’s COVID Crisis Lab.

The authors observe substantial gender differences in both attitudes and behaviors through a two-wave survey (March and April 2020), with 21,649 respondents in Australia, Austria, France, Germany, Italy, New Zealand, the UK and the US, which is part of the international project REPEAT (REpresentations, PErceptions and ATtitudes on the COVID-19).

Women around the world are more inclined than men to consider COVID-19 a very serious health problem (59% against 48.7% in March and 39.6% against 33% in April), they are more inclined to agree with public policies that fight the pandemic, such as mobility restrictions and social distancing (54,1 against 47,7 in an index that goes from 1 to 100 in March and 42,6 against 37,4 in April) and are clearly more inclined to follow the rules concerning COVID-19 (88,1% against 83,2% in March and 77,6% against 71,8% in April).

The share of individuals complying with the rules drops over time, particularly in Germany, from 85.8% of women and 81.5% of men in March to 70.5% of women and 63.7% of men in April, but the large gender gap persists.

“The biggest differences between men and women relate to behaviors that serve to protect others above all, such as coughing in the elbow, unlike those that can protect both themselves and others,” says Profeta.
Gender differences persist even after the study controlled a large number of sociodemographic characteristics and psychological factors.

However, such differences are smaller among married couples, who live together and share their views with each other, and among individuals most directly exposed to the pandemic. They decrease over time if men and women are exposed to the same flow of information about the pandemic.

###

Media Contact
Tomaso Eridani, Press Office, Bocconi Uni.
[email protected]

Related Journal Article

http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2012520117

Tags: BehaviorHealth CareHealth Care Systems/ServicesPersonality/AttitudePolicy/EthicsPublic HealthSocial/Behavioral Science
Share12Tweet8Share2ShareShareShare2

Related Posts

HPV Status Alters T-Cell Profiles in Oesophageal Cancer

November 27, 2025

PD-1 Axis Sustains High-Avidity Stem-Like CD8+ T Cells

November 27, 2025

Progestin vs. GnRH Antagonist: IVF Clinical Outcomes Revealed

November 27, 2025

Sexual Dimorphism in BDNF-Deficient Hypothalamic Neurons

November 27, 2025
Please login to join discussion

POPULAR NEWS

  • New Research Unveils the Pathway for CEOs to Achieve Social Media Stardom

    New Research Unveils the Pathway for CEOs to Achieve Social Media Stardom

    203 shares
    Share 81 Tweet 51
  • Scientists Uncover Chameleon’s Telephone-Cord-Like Optic Nerves, A Feature Missed by Aristotle and Newton

    119 shares
    Share 48 Tweet 30
  • Neurological Impacts of COVID and MIS-C in Children

    103 shares
    Share 41 Tweet 26
  • Scientists Create Fast, Scalable In Planta Directed Evolution Platform

    101 shares
    Share 40 Tweet 25

About

We bring you the latest biotechnology news from best research centers and universities around the world. Check our website.

Follow us

Recent News

Noninvasive Optoacoustic Imaging Reveals Mouse Heart Dynamics

IGF1 Levels Drop in Preeclampsia Impacting Trophoblasts

Evaluating GNSS Signal Disruption in Stadiums Quantitatively

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 69 other subscribers
  • Contact Us

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Homepages
    • Home Page 1
    • Home Page 2
  • News
  • National
  • Business
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Science

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.