As the world marks a decade since the adoption of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, the scientific and global community is prompted to reflect on an extraordinary journey of resilience-building, innovation, and persisting challenges. Initiated in 2015 at the Third UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction, the Sendai Framework has become the cornerstone of international efforts to reduce disaster risk and enhance preparedness, with an ambitious horizon extending to 2030. This editorial introduction by Ilan Kelman, published in the International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, arrives at a critical juncture: ten years into a transformative global agenda and halfway through its temporal span, urging deeper analysis and adaptive strategies to meet the evolving landscape of disaster risk.
Central to the Sendai Framework is its paradigm shift from reactive disaster management to proactive risk reduction. It recognizes that disasters are not isolated events but products of intertwined social, environmental, and political vulnerabilities. The framework established seven global targets ranging from reducing mortality and economic losses to enhancing international cooperation and access to multi-hazard early warning systems. Over the past decade, these benchmarks have served as a global compass guiding policies, funding, and research. However, the realization of these targets has been uneven across regions and sectors, underscoring the complex interplay of governance, social equity, and scientific advancement.
The editorial underscores the inherent complexity of disaster risk, highlighting that technical solutions alone cannot suffice. Instead, disaster risk reduction (DRR) requires systemic approaches that integrate science, policy, and community engagement. The Sendai Framework has catalyzed multi-disciplinary research linking climate change adaptation, sustainable development, and disaster ethics, emphasizing the human dimensions alongside physical hazards. Consequently, the conversation transcends traditional emergency responses, calling for transformative change in urban planning, infrastructure design, and socio-economic systems vulnerable to natural and anthropogenic hazards.
The editorial also draws attention to progress made in early warning systems and data analytics, which have ushered in a new era of disaster preparedness. Earth observation technologies, artificial intelligence, and real-time sensor networks have enhanced the capacity to predict and respond to hazards. Yet, the integration of cutting-edge science into local contexts remains a persistent challenge. Effective DRR necessitates translating technical data into actionable information for vulnerable communities, demanding inclusive governance structures and investments in education and capacity-building at grassroots levels.
One of the key technical themes explored involves the incorporation of risk assessments that account for cascading disasters and compound risks. Traditional risk models often treat hazards in isolation, but recent events have demonstrated the interconnected nature of disasters—such as how a major earthquake can trigger tsunamis, infrastructure failures, and even pandemics. The Sendai Framework promotes holistic risk modeling to inform resilient infrastructure and community preparedness. However, sophisticated modeling requires comprehensive data collection, interdisciplinary collaboration, and political will to influence decision-making.
Ilan Kelman’s editorial also reflects critically on equity issues within disaster risk reduction. Vulnerable populations frequently bear the brunt of disasters due to systemic inequalities in access to resources, information, and governance. The Sendai Framework explicitly acknowledges these disparities but translating commitments into tangible outcomes reveals significant gaps. The editorial argues for embedding social justice principles at the heart of DRR, leveraging community knowledge and participatory approaches to ensure that policies do not marginalize but empower those most at risk.
International cooperation emerges as an essential enabler but not a panacea. While the Sendai Framework has fostered unprecedented global partnerships among states, NGOs, academia, and the private sector, differing priorities and capacities among stakeholders complicate implementation. The editorial outlines the necessity for coordinated funding mechanisms and knowledge sharing platforms that transcend political boundaries, particularly in addressing cross-border risks such as pandemics and climate-induced disasters.
Climate change looms large over the Sendai agenda and its future trajectory. The editorial emphasizes that the increasing frequency and intensity of extreme weather events intensify disaster risks, reinforcing the urgency for integrated adaptation and mitigation strategies. The scientific community’s growing understanding of climate dynamics must be harnessed to refine risk projections and guide resilience investments. Moreover, recognizing the feedback loops between disaster impacts and environmental degradation is vital to avoid catastrophic tipping points.
Technological innovation holds both promise and peril in the evolving DRR landscape. Advances in remote sensing, unmanned aerial vehicles, and big data have opened frontiers for enhanced disaster monitoring and response. At the same time, reliance on technology can exacerbate vulnerabilities if not accessible or understood by local populations. The editorial calls for ethical frameworks to govern technology deployment, ensuring inclusivity, data privacy, and safeguarding against misinformation during crises.
Another salient point concerns urbanization trends and the expansion of informal settlements, often located in high-risk zones. The Sendai Framework’s urban resilience component emphasizes land-use planning and upgrading infrastructure to mitigate risk. However, rapid and unplanned urban growth, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, presents complexities for DRR strategies. Enhancing urban resilience requires cross-sectoral coordination, innovative financing models, and empowering local governance to manage hazards without displacing marginalized communities.
The editorial further addresses the importance of education and culture in embedding disaster resilience. Disaster risk reduction cannot be realized solely through technical interventions but requires cultivating risk awareness, adaptive behaviors, and community solidarity. Integrating DRR concepts into formal and informal education systems, as well as leveraging cultural expressions and indigenous knowledge, serves to strengthen societal preparedness and social cohesion against potential shocks.
Looking ahead, the five remaining years to 2030 outlined in the Sendai Framework demand accelerated action and adaptive learning. The editorial argues for robust monitoring and evaluation frameworks, employing both quantitative metrics and qualitative narratives to capture progress and setbacks. Embracing uncertainty and fostering flexibility in DRR policies will be paramount in responding to the dynamic nature of hazards and vulnerabilities amplified by global change.
Ilan Kelman’s introduction serves not only as a retrospective but as a clarion call to reinvigorate commitment and innovation in reducing disaster risk. The urgency is clearer than ever: as hazards grow in complexity and scale, so too must our collective capacity to understand, prepare for, and mitigate their impacts. Bridging science, policy, equity, and technology remains an ongoing challenge but is essential to fulfilling the promise of the Sendai Framework.
In conclusion, this editorial provides a sophisticated overview of the Sendai Framework’s first decade and the pressing opportunities and challenges for its implementation in the upcoming years. It highlights that disaster risk reduction is an evolving field, necessitating interdisciplinary collaboration, inclusive governance, and continuous innovation. The path forward will demand not only scientific and technical excellence but also resilience of social systems, equity in risk distribution, and unwavering political will to safeguard lives and development gains worldwide.
Subject of Research: Disaster risk reduction and the Sendai Framework
Article Title: Editorial Introduction: 10 Years After and 5 Years to Go for the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction
Article References:
Kelman, I. Editorial Introduction: 10 Years After and 5 Years to Go for the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 16, 1–3 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-025-00617-6
Image Credits: AI Generated
Tags: 2030 disaster risk reduction goalschallenges in disaster risk reductionevaluation of global targets in disaster reductionglobal disaster risk management strategiesimpact of climate change on disaster riskinnovative approaches to disaster preparednessinternational cooperation in disaster managementmulti-hazard early warning systemsproactive versus reactive disaster managementreflections on a decade of disaster risk initiativesresilience building in communitiesSendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction
