• HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
Saturday, January 24, 2026
BIOENGINEER.ORG
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
No Result
View All Result
Bioengineer.org
No Result
View All Result
Home NEWS Science News Health

ロモソズマブとテリパラチドの持続性比較

Bioengineer by Bioengineer
January 24, 2026
in Health
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0
ロモソズマブとテリパラチドの持続性比較
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on RedditShare on Telegram

In a significant advancement in osteoporosis treatment, recent population-based cohort studies have highlighted the comparative persistence of romosozumab and teriparatide in older Japanese adults aged 75 years and above. Osteoporosis, a prevalent condition among the elderly, especially affects bone health, increasing fracture risk and leading to severe health consequences. This study sheds light on long-term treatment strategies crucial for managing osteoporosis effectively in an aging population.

Romosozumab, a monoclonal antibody, has emerged as a novel therapy designed to enhance bone density and strength. By inhibiting sclerostin, a protein that negatively regulates bone formation, romosozumab stimulates osteoblast activity. This mechanism represents a distinct therapeutic approach compared to traditional osteoporosis treatments. Teriparatide, on the other hand, is a form of parathyroid hormone that promotes bone formation. While both agents have demonstrated efficacy, their long-term utilization and patient adherence are fundamental considerations for clinicians.

The research focused on a cohort of older Japanese adults, emphasizing the unique demographic characteristics of this population. Japan, facing a rapidly aging society, presents an ideal context for this comparative analysis, given the prevalent rates of osteoporosis among elderly individuals. Notably, the study involved participants aged 75 years and older, a demographic often underrepresented in clinical trials yet critically impacted by osteoporosis-related complications.

Through rigorous data collection and analysis, the study evaluated persistence rates of both treatments over a defined period. Persistence, in this context, refers to the duration that patients remain on therapy without discontinuation. Understanding which treatment demonstrates superior persistence is essential for guiding clinical decisions and optimizing patient outcomes.

Findings from the study revealed that romosozumab exhibited a higher persistence rate compared to teriparatide among the older adult cohort. This outcome suggests that those receiving romosozumab are more likely to adhere to their treatment regimen over time, a crucial factor in managing chronic conditions like osteoporosis. Researchers noted that persistence not only reflects patient satisfaction but also correlates with better health outcomes, including reduced fracture rates and improved overall quality of life.

The results also highlighted the importance of considering patient preferences and the side effect profiles of the treatments. Both romosozumab and teriparatide have distinct side effects, and understanding how these affect patient willingness to continue therapy is vital. This aspect of the study underscores the need for personalized treatment plans that align with patients’ lifestyles and concerns, particularly in the geriatric population.

Moreover, economic implications of treatment persistence cannot be overlooked. Higher medication adherence can lead to reduced healthcare costs over time, as fewer osteoporotic fractures translate to fewer hospitalizations and interventions. The study opens discussions on the economic burden of osteoporosis treatments and the importance of effective management strategies that not only prioritize patient health but also address financial sustainability within healthcare systems.

Another noteworthy aspect of the study was its emphasis on cultural factors influencing treatment adherence among the Japanese elderly. Understanding the cultural attitudes towards medication, health, and aging can significantly impact treatment outcomes. The study’s findings suggest that culturally tailored interventions may enhance patient engagement and adherence to osteoporosis management plans.

In addition, the role of healthcare providers emerged as a crucial theme in the analysis. Effective communication and ongoing support from healthcare professionals can significantly influence patient adherence to prescribed therapy. The study advocates for the need for comprehensive patient education, fostering an environment where patients feel confident in their treatment choices.

As the world’s population ages, similar studies will become increasingly vital. They provide insights into optimal treatment strategies and pave the way for improved clinical guidelines tailored to the unique needs of older adults. Emphasizing the importance of ongoing research in this field will be essential in shaping future osteoporosis treatment protocols.

The study by Yoshiyama, Fukasawa, and Masuda serves as a compelling addition to the broader narrative on osteoporosis management among older adults. It reinforces the necessity of evaluating not only the efficacy of treatment options but also their long-term sustainability. The insights garnered from this research can inform healthcare policies and improve therapeutic frameworks, ultimately benefiting patients grappling with the complexities of osteoporosis.

In conclusion, as the healthcare community seeks effective strategies to address the challenges posed by osteoporosis, understanding the persistence of romosozumab versus teriparatide in older adults is a crucial step. These findings support the need for informed clinical decision-making and underscore the broader implications for patient outcomes and healthcare systems. Ongoing research in this area holds promise for advancing osteoporosis care and improving quality of life among older populations.

Subject of Research: Persistence of romosozumab vs. teriparatide in older adults with osteoporosis.

Article Title: Persistence of romosozumab vs. teriparatide in Japanese older adults aged ≥ 75 years with osteoporosis: a population-based cohort study.

Article References:
Yoshiyama, T., Fukasawa, T., Masuda, S. et al. Persistence of romosozumab vs. teriparatide in Japanese older adults aged ≥ 75 years with osteoporosis: a population-based cohort study. Arch Osteoporos 21, 14 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-025-01646-w

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-025-01646-w

Keywords: osteoporosis, romosozumab, teriparatide, persistence, older adults, Japan, bone health, treatment adherence, geriatric care.

Tags: aging population and fracture riskcomparative persistence of osteoporosis therapiesdemographic factors in osteoporosis managementJapanese adults osteoporosis studylong-term bone health strategiesmonoclonal antibody therapy for osteoporosisnovel therapies for osteoporosis in older adultsosteoporosis treatment in elderlypatient adherence in osteoporosis treatmentromosozumab vs teriparatide effectivenesssclerostin inhibition in bone densityteriparatide and bone formation

Tags: Aging population osteoporosis** **Açıklama:** 1. **Romosozumab vs teriparatide persistence:** Çalışmanın temel konusu olan iki ilacın tedavi devamlılığının doğrudan karşılaElderly Japanese cohortİşte içeriğe uygun 5 etiket: **Romosozumab vs teriparatide persistenceJapanese elderlyLong-term bone therapyMakalenin içeriğine uygun 5 etiket: **romosozumab persistenceosteoporosis geriatricsOsteoporosis treatment adherenceromosozumab kullananlarda tedavi sürekliliğinin daha yüksek olmasıdır. Doğrudanteriparatide adherencetreatment continuation** **Açıklama:** 1. **romosozumab persistence:** Çalışmanın temel bulgusu
Share12Tweet8Share2ShareShareShare2

Related Posts

Screening and Treating Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia Early

January 24, 2026

National Study Reveals Nurse Turnover Intentions

January 24, 2026

Leveraging EHR Portals for Advance Directives Collection

January 24, 2026

Exploring Non-Communicable Disease Prevention in Ghana’s Clinics

January 24, 2026

POPULAR NEWS

  • Enhancing Spiritual Care Education in Nursing Programs

    156 shares
    Share 62 Tweet 39
  • PTSD, Depression, Anxiety in Childhood Cancer Survivors, Parents

    148 shares
    Share 59 Tweet 37
  • Robotic Ureteral Reconstruction: A Novel Approach

    80 shares
    Share 32 Tweet 20
  • Digital Privacy: Health Data Control in Incarceration

    62 shares
    Share 25 Tweet 16

About

We bring you the latest biotechnology news from best research centers and universities around the world. Check our website.

Follow us

Recent News

Screening and Treating Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia Early

National Study Reveals Nurse Turnover Intentions

Urban Mice Outpace Protected Counterparts in Problem Solving

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 71 other subscribers
  • Contact Us

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Homepages
    • Home Page 1
    • Home Page 2
  • News
  • National
  • Business
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Science

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.