Treating wastewater using passive processes

Human activities have a significant impact on natural waters, aquatic biodiversity and the quality of drinking water resources. For Professor Mathieu Lapointe of the Department of Construction Engineering at École de technologie supérieure (ÉTS), it is possible to treat certain types of wastewater—not currently treated—globally using more sustainable and affordable in situ methods. 

In a study carried out by Professor Lapointe and published in the Nature journal, the rate of discharge into the environment of certain types of untreated water—urban and rural runoff, as well as that generated by industry—varies from one country to another. Countries with lower incomes tend to discharge more than those with higher incomes. More specifically, wastewater treatment rates can vary from 4% to 95%, depending on the country.

Water treatment plants are not only costly, they also consume a lot of energy. Moreover, they don’t solve the problems associated with urban waterproofing or the erratic excess rainfall caused by climate change. In addition, agricultural and urban runoff is often considered insufficiently contaminated to justify the cost of using conventional treatment plants. As a result, runoff remains untreated even though it can contaminate aquatic ecosystems.

Professor Lapointe recommends passive, modular, inexpensive, and decentralized solutions capable of retaining certain contaminants. These include bioretention cells, aggregate-decant systems and seepage areas through functionalized soils. He also proposes a greater reliance on “passive ecosystem services,” including microorganisms, oxidation, photodegradation and inactivation, to name a few.  

“To treat waters that are not currently treated for techno-economic reasons, such as stormwater runoff, government authorities and environmental organizations would do well to promote passive systems, which can be combined or integrated with more conventional processes for collecting and treating wastewater. 

Although more in-depth studies are needed to better assess the advantages and cost-benefits of this solution that combines technology with passive methods, Professor Lapointe is optimistic about the viability of this alternative.

It seems that his peers and the water industry agree with him! His study has been published in Nature (Water), the world’s leading journal for water-related issues.