Houston, TX (November 7, 2025) — New insights from a comprehensive benefit-harm analysis of the landmark Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) reveal a compelling argument for targeting a systolic blood pressure below 120 mm Hg in adults suffering from chronic kidney disease (CKD). The analysis meticulously evaluates the trade-offs between intensive blood pressure management and its potential adverse effects, offering strong evidence that nearly all individuals with CKD could derive net positive benefits from this stringent target compared to the standard goal of below 140 mm Hg. These groundbreaking findings were unveiled during the renowned ASN Kidney Week 2025 conference, held November 5 through 9 in Houston, Texas.
This study applies a sophisticated benefit-harm trade-off model on data comprising 2,012 CKD patients who participated in the original SPRINT trial. By integrating individualized predictions across multiple clinically-relevant outcomes, including mortality reduction, cardiovascular event prevention, and cognitive decline mitigation, the investigators simulate scenarios accounting for patient preferences regarding treatment risks. These preferences encompass the potential harms of intensive therapy, such as emergency interventions for acute kidney injury and incidences of syncope. Remarkably, when emphasizing benefits over harms, the model indicates that 100% of patients exhibit a positive net benefit favoring intensive blood pressure lowering.
Even under more balanced assumptions—where benefits and harms are assigned roughly equal weight—the analysis sustains nearly universal support for tighter blood pressure control, showing that nine out of ten patients still achieve a positive net benefit. This robust finding not only challenges prevailing hesitancy regarding intensive treatment but reinforces the notion that personalized approaches can optimize therapeutic efficacy while managing risk profiles.
The study further stratified participants by CKD severity to elucidate differential responses to therapy. Individuals classified with more advanced stages of CKD, characterized by estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) between 20 and 44 mL/min/1.73 m², demonstrated a higher incidence of treatment-related adversities compared to those with milder CKD having eGFR between 45 and 59 mL/min/1.73 m². However, this more vulnerable group also experienced amplified benefits encompassing survival advantage and cardiovascular protection. Consequently, the net benefit remained more favorable for patients with advanced CKD, suggesting that severe renal impairment should not deter the adoption of comprehensive blood pressure lowering strategies.
These results align closely with current recommendations issued by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines, which endorse a systolic blood pressure target of less than 120 mm Hg for adults afflicted by hypertension complicated by CKD. This novel analysis brings quantitative rigor and personalized nuance to guideline implementation, equipping clinicians and patients with evidence-based clarity that may mitigate therapeutic inertia—a well-documented obstacle to intensifying blood pressure control in the CKD population.
The implications extend beyond dosing decisions, inviting a paradigm shift toward shared decision-making that incorporates individual risk assessments and treatment valuations. Corresponding author Alan Vera, a medical student at the University of California Davis, emphasized that the study’s methodology enables tailoring blood pressure targets according to a patient’s unique clinical profile and outcome preferences, thus fostering informed consent dialogues grounded in empirical data.
Blood pressure management in CKD has long posed a clinical conundrum, balancing the undeniable cardiovascular benefits of lower pressures against renal perfusion concerns and potential adverse events like acute kidney injury. By employing a multidimensional modeling framework that simultaneously weighs competing outcomes, this investigation transcends simplistic dichotomies and offers a precision medicine approach applicable at the bedside.
Importantly, the analysis scrutinizes real-world scenarios reflecting the complexities of CKD comorbidities, intervening complications, and patient heterogeneity. It affirms that intensification of antihypertensive regimens, within controlled parameters, can confer substantial survival and quality-of-life improvements without incurring prohibitive risks, even in patients traditionally viewed as vulnerable due to kidney impairment.
While the study focuses on the systolic blood pressure metric as a surrogate endpoint, it situates this parameter within the broader clinical context of CKD management, highlighting its critical role in preventing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, which remain leading causes of death among this population. The work also indirectly challenges clinicians to reassess therapeutic thresholds and monitoring strategies, particularly in light of evolving pharmacologic options and personalized risk stratification tools.
As Kidney Week 2025 convened nephrology experts from across the globe, such data-driven advances underscore the momentum toward individualized, evidence-based interventions that reconcile clinical efficacy with patient safety. This analysis contributes a pivotal piece to the intricate puzzle of optimizing outcomes for millions of individuals worldwide grappling with the dual burden of hypertension and CKD.
By illuminating the substantial net benefits of intensive blood pressure control tailored to patient-specific parameters, the findings from the SPRINT cohort analysis herald a more confident adoption of aggressive hypertension targets, ultimately advancing both clinical practice and patient-centered care in nephrology.
Subject of Research: Intensive blood pressure lowering in adults with chronic kidney disease based on individualized benefit-harm analysis of the SPRINT trial data.
Article Title: Individualized Net Benefit of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering Among Persons with CKD in SPRINT
News Publication Date: November 7, 2025
Web References:
– American Society of Nephrology: www.asn-online.org
– Kidney Week 2025 conference information: #KidneyWk on social media platforms
Keywords: Intensive blood pressure lowering, chronic kidney disease, SPRINT trial, benefit-harm analysis, systolic blood pressure target, KDIGO guidelines, cardiovascular events, mortality reduction, acute kidney injury, personalized medicine, nephrology, shared decision-making
Tags: ASN Kidney Week 2025 findingsbenefit-harm trade-off analysiscardiovascular health in CKDchronic kidney disease managementcognitive decline prevention strategiesemergency interventions for kidney injuryhypertension treatment benefitsintensive blood pressure controllow systolic blood pressure guidelinesmortality reduction in CKD patientspatient preferences in treatmentSystolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial
