In the heart of Arkansas, where sprawling fields have long defined the landscape and economy, a quiet revolution in energy production is underway. Large-scale solar photovoltaic arrays are beginning to dot the agricultural map, signaling a shifting balance between traditional farming and renewable energy infrastructure. Recent research from the University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture offers a comprehensive analysis of this phenomenon, highlighting the actual land footprint of solar energy development within the state and its interplay with agriculture. Contrary to fears of widespread farmland displacement, the study reveals that solar installations currently occupy a minuscule fraction of Arkansas’s vast agricultural acreage, suggesting that the transition to renewable energy can progress with minimal disruption to farming activities.
Solar energy’s rapid ascendance in Arkansas reflects a broader national trend toward decarbonization and sustainable power generation. Over the past decade, the efficiency of photovoltaic technologies has nearly doubled—a critical factor enabling solar to compete with, and oftentimes outperform, conventional energy sources. According to a 2022 analytical study cited by the university’s researchers, generating one megawatt of electrical power requires about 5.5 acres of land, a notable improvement from earlier estimates around nine acres per megawatt. This increase in efficiency underpins the feasibility of integrating significant solar capacity without drastically encroaching on valuable agricultural lands.
Statewide projections indicate that by 2026, solar arrays of utility scale—defined as those with a capacity of 20 megawatts or greater—will be operational in 15 Arkansas counties. Most of these counties are located in the agriculturally intensive Delta region. Current installations occupy approximately 0.2 percent of the state’s 13.7 million acres of farmland, with site-specific land usage varying from 0.2 to as much as 1.7 percent in some counties. Even the largest solar sites, capable of producing 300 megawatts, occupy only around 2,670 acres, a modest footprint relative to the region’s total cultivated land.
.adsslot_8DXFGdO72V{ width:728px !important; height:90px !important; }
@media (max-width:1199px) { .adsslot_8DXFGdO72V{ width:468px !important; height:60px !important; } }
@media (max-width:767px) { .adsslot_8DXFGdO72V{ width:320px !important; height:50px !important; } }
ADVERTISEMENT
One of the study’s lead authors, Mike Popp, a professor of agricultural economics, emphasizes that while concerns about food security and rural economies are valid, the actual impact of solar projects on crop prices and agricultural output is likely negligible in the near term. The analysis further cautions, however, that other considerations — such as local real estate impacts and the planning required for land restoration post-solar deployment — warrant closer examination as the industry expands. Despite these nuanced challenges, strategic siting and integrated land management can unlock synergies between agriculture and solar production.
Digging deeper into land-use dynamics, the researchers drew upon comprehensive data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration to construct their projections. Despite the growing number of solar arrays, agriculture remains the predominant land use, and the extent of conversion to solar installations is marginal. Should the state radically accelerate solar capacity expansion to double its current 15,000 megawatt electrical generation capability exclusively through solar, the calculations estimate about 133,500 acres would be needed statewide. Even under this aggressive scenario, solar would still claim less than 1 percent of total agricultural acreage, indicating a robust capacity for scaling solar power within existing land-use frameworks.
The economic dimension of solar farm land leasing also garners attention. Private landowners commonly enter into long-term lease agreements—sometimes extending up to 30 years—providing a diversified income stream without necessarily displacing traditional farming activities. Lease rates vary widely, from $450 to $2,500 per acre, with ideal sites featuring cleared, leveled terrains or southward slopes that eschew wetlands. The researchers underscore that utility-scale solar projects are increasingly the most cost-effective source of renewable energy, a factor expected to drive further expansion in Arkansas and beyond.
The study’s implications extend to financing models supporting solar deployment on farms, particularly poultry operations integral to Arkansas’s agricultural profile. Utilizing decision support software tailored for solar investment analysis, the research team identified financing structures combining short-term notes and income tax credits that optimize cash flow and reduce the break-even cost of electricity. Longer-term loans, while easing cash burdens, affect overall leverage and net present value, underscoring the complex financial considerations farmers must navigate when integrating solar into their operations.
Solar energy’s expansion in Arkansas is thus not solely an environmental or technological story but a multifaceted interplay of agricultural economics, land management, and policy. The University of Arkansas research spotlights the importance of careful planning and comprehensive stakeholder engagement to ensure that energy transitions complement existing rural economies and ecosystems rather than undermine them. Transparent data and predictive modeling offer critical tools in this endeavor, enabling communities and policymakers to chart pathways that balance renewable energy growth with agricultural sustainability.
In sum, Arkansas’s experience underscores a critical lesson for regions balancing conservation and development: renewable energy’s footprint on agricultural land remains modest today and holds promise for strategic growth that safeguards the essential productivity of the land. The university’s case study thus contributes valuable empirical evidence to the ongoing discourse on sustainable energy transitions, demonstrating that solar power can be expanded at scale with mindful stewardship and innovative integration practices. This blueprint could resonate internationally as societies confront the complexity of meeting carbon neutrality goals without sacrificing food security or rural livelihoods.
As research continues and solar technologies evolve, ongoing monitoring and adaptive management will be vital. In particular, attention to local economic impacts, land restoration efforts after project lifecycles, and evolving financing structures will help optimize benefits and mitigate risks. The collaborative effort between academic institutions, farmers, policymakers, and energy developers illustrated by this study exemplifies the holistic approach necessary to navigate the intricacies of a solar-powered future grounded in agricultural traditions.
Subject of Research: Not applicable
Article Title: Agricultural Land Footprint of Solar Photovoltaic Installations in Arkansas
News Publication Date: 15-May-2025
Web References:
University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture: https://aaes.uada.edu
Agricultural Finance Review study: https://doi.org/10.1108/AFR-01-2024-0003
IEEE study on solar land use efficiency: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9676427
USDA data on solar land use: https://doi.org/10.32747/2024.8374829.ers
References:
University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture fact sheet “Agricultural Land Footprint of Solar Photovoltaic Installations in Arkansas”
2022 study on solar land use efficiency (IEEE)
2013 solar land use study (NREL)
USDA Agricultural Research data
Image Credits: Courtesy of Mike Popp
Keywords:
Alternative energy, Farming, Agricultural policy
Tags: agricultural land use and renewable energybalance between farming and solar energydecarbonization and sustainable energyefficiency of photovoltaic technologiesimpact of solar energy on farmingland footprint of solar energy developmentminimal disruption to farming activitiesrenewable energy infrastructure in agriculturesolar energy competition with conventional sourcessolar power installations in Arkansastrends in renewable energy adoptionUniversity of Arkansas research on solar energy
