• HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
Sunday, July 12, 2026
BIOENGINEER.ORG
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
No Result
View All Result
Bioengineer.org
No Result
View All Result
Home NEWS Science News Health

Medical errors in the emergency room: Understanding why

Bioengineer by Bioengineer
July 27, 2018
in Health
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on RedditShare on Telegram

Medical errors are estimated to cause 250,000 deaths per year in the US. Previously, research on admitted patients suggested that errors are due to the way doctors process the data they have about patients – in other words, doctors have the right information, but might not act on it in the best way.

The emergency department is a very different clinical environment from the inpatient wards, with frequent interruptions and often incomplete or unreliable information. Despite this, a new study published in De Gruyter's Journal Diagnosis shows that doctors in an emergency department with trainees make similar types of errors to those made in admitted patients – more information processing errors are made than errors of inadequate knowledge or inadequate information.

Researchers looked at patients who came back to emergency departments a second time within 72 hours and were admitted to the hospital on their second visit – an indicator that care could have been improved during the first visit. A trained team of physicians looked at each case to determine whether the team during the patient's first visit might have made a mistake, and if one was found, determined the type of mistake that was made.

The most frequently identified type of error (45% of cases) was problems with information processing, followed by problems with verifying information that was gathered (31%). Inadequate knowledge problems (6%) and inadequate information gathering (18%) occurred relatively infrequently. Misjudging how significant a finding was and prematurely deciding on an incorrect diagnosis were the individual errors that occurred most frequently (13% each).

The study also found that patients with abdominal complaints may be particularly vulnerable to these errors.

Study author Benjamin Schnapp of the University of Wisconsin said, "It's critical that we understand how and why these errors happen so that we can start to work to prevent them, and this is one small step towards that."

###

Read the full study here for free: https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2018-0011

Media Contact

Eric Merkel-Sobotta
[email protected]
49-302-600-5304
@DeGruyterOA

https://www.degruyter.com/dg/page/open-access

https://www.degruyter.com/dg/newsitem/287/medical-errors-in-the-emergency-room-understanding-why

Related Journal Article

http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/dx-2018-0011

Share15Tweet8Share2ShareShareShare2

Related Posts

Sedentary Time and Sleep Impact Cognitive Health in Older Diabetics

July 12, 2026

Evaluating Geriatric Assessment and Interventions for Prostate Cancer Patients on ADT

July 11, 2026

Single-Cell Multi-Omics Reveals Cancer-Associated Fibroblast Programs in Breast Cancer

July 11, 2026

Real-Time Tracking of Pathogen Spread Using Wastewater Analysis

July 11, 2026
Please login to join discussion

POPULAR NEWS

  • Detection of EDCs in Breast Milk and Infant Urine Up to Six Months Highlights Early Exposure Risks

    77 shares
    Share 31 Tweet 19
  • New Drug Candidate Developed at McMaster Shows Potential for Treating Brain Cancer

    58 shares
    Share 23 Tweet 15
  • KTU Researchers Explore Ultrasound’s Role in Enhancing Blood Flow Beyond Diagnostics

    53 shares
    Share 21 Tweet 13
  • 高齢者の骨粗鬆症治療の持続性比較

    51 shares
    Share 20 Tweet 13

About

BIOENGINEER.ORG

We bring you the latest biotechnology news from best research centers and universities around the world. Check our website.

Follow us

Recent News

Sedentary Time and Sleep Impact Cognitive Health in Older Diabetics

TP53 Mutation Triggers CD8+ T Cell Exhaustion Causing Therapy-Resistant Urothelial Cancer

Transient Simulation Advances in Bioresorbable Flexible Electronic Circuits

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Success! An email was just sent to confirm your subscription. Please find the email now and click 'Confirm' to start subscribing.

Join 85 other subscribers
  • Contact Us

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Homepages
    • Home Page 1
    • Home Page 2
  • News
  • National
  • Business
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Science

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.