• HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
Tuesday, October 14, 2025
BIOENGINEER.ORG
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
No Result
View All Result
Bioengineer.org
No Result
View All Result
Home NEWS Science News Health

Immune responses from early study of novel sarcoma vaccine

Bioengineer by Bioengineer
June 1, 2017
in Health
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on RedditShare on Telegram

SEATTLE — June 1, 2017 — The critical component of an experimental vaccine led to an escalating immune response in patients with sarcoma, an indicator of its potential anti-cancer effects.

The findings give hope for a vaccine for sarcoma, called CMB305, an immunotherapy strategy that involves using an engineered virus to teach patients' immune systems to recognize and kill tumor cells.

The findings will be presented by Dr. Seth Pollack, a physician-scientist at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, June 5 in a poster at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting in Chicago.

The poster presentation reinforces the results of an early-stage clinical trial led by Dr. Neeta Somaiah of MD Anderson Cancer Center and to be presented June 2 at the ASCO meeting. Pollack is a senior investigator on the trial.

In the poster presentation, Pollack — a physician-scientist who specializes in sarcoma — and his collaborators examined participants' immune responses before and after receiving the vaccine. They studied 62 patients enrolled in this trial or in an earlier trial that used only the virus component of the vaccine without the additional immune-boosters included in CMB305.

The data suggested that the vaccine was working as designed: In patients on both trials, Pollack and his collaborators found multiple signs of escalating immune responses to NY-ESO-1, a protein marker found almost exclusively in cancer cells, but not healthy cells. An immune response directed at NY-ESO-1 will kill cancer cells but leave healthy cells alone.

Patients' immune systems also started recognizing and responding to other cancer markers besides NY-ESO-1 after vaccination, too.

But across the board, Pollack's team observed the biggest boost in signs of anti-cancer immunity among patients vaccinated with the newer version of the vaccine, CMB305.

"My feeling is that [the additional component in the CMB305 vaccine] does help, because we definitely saw a better immune monitoring response," Pollack said.

In the June 2 ASCO presentation of the Phase 1 clinical trial results, Somaiah will report that in 16 of 25 participants with advanced, soft-tissue sarcoma, tumors stopped growing after the patients received injections of CMB305. Of these, about three-quarters had no disease progression by three months, 36 percent had no disease at six months and 83 percent of them were still alive after one year.

The results "compare favorably" to published data on several FDA-approved therapies for these cancers, Pollack said.

Patients received four injections of the engineered virus over three months, plus a series of injections of an immune-boosting formulation for a year. The two subtypes of sarcoma studied in this trial were myxoid/round cell liposarcoma and synovial sarcoma.

"The results, so far, are exciting and show that the vaccine works; generates an immune response and stabilizes tumors, and will definitely lead to additional studies," said Somaiah, who led the study. "Hopefully, if we design the studies right, we will have this as a treatment option in the near future."

One trial participant had a serious side effect (severe pain); the rest reported relatively minor side effects like soreness at the injection site that lasted one day.

"The lack of side effects makes the findings from the CMB305 trial especially noteworthy," Pollack said. "For most patients with these sarcomas, the most difficult symptoms they face throughout their illness are side effects from chemotherapy, which is a typical treatment for sarcomas."

The engineered virus in CMB305, which incorporates elements of multiple natural viruses, derives from discoveries made in the lab of Nobel Prize-winning scientist Dr. David Baltimore of CalTech. Baltimore and the Hutch's Dr. Larry Corey are among the scientific co-founders of Seattle's Immune Design, which owns CMB305 and sponsored this trial.

###

Neither Somaiah nor Pollack has a personal financial interest in Immune Design. Pollack receives funding from the company through Fred Hutch to carry out research on some of the company's products.

At Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, home to three Nobel laureates, interdisciplinary teams of world-renowned scientists seek new and innovative ways to prevent, diagnose and treat cancer, HIV/AIDS and other life-threatening diseases. Fred Hutch's pioneering work in bone marrow transplantation led to the development of immunotherapy, which harnesses the power of the immune system to treat cancer. An independent, nonprofit research institute based in Seattle, Fred Hutch houses the nation's first NCI-designated cancer prevention research program, as well as the clinical coordinating center of the Women's Health Initiative and the international headquarters of the HIV Vaccine Trials Network.

Media Contact

Jonathan Rabinovitz
[email protected]
206-658-7612
@FredHutch

http://www.fredhutch.org

############

Story Source: Materials provided by Scienmag

Share12Tweet7Share2ShareShareShare1

Related Posts

Fertility Preservation Challenges in Endometrioid Cancer Cases

October 14, 2025

Unraveling Lymphatic Plastic Bronchitis Mysteries

October 14, 2025

New Study Connects Wind-Driven Dust from Shrinking Salton Sea to Declining Lung Function in Local Children

October 14, 2025

Multidisciplinary Research Uncovers Estrogen’s Potential in Treating Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

October 14, 2025
Please login to join discussion

POPULAR NEWS

  • Sperm MicroRNAs: Crucial Mediators of Paternal Exercise Capacity Transmission

    1240 shares
    Share 495 Tweet 310
  • New Study Reveals the Science Behind Exercise and Weight Loss

    104 shares
    Share 42 Tweet 26
  • New Study Indicates Children’s Risk of Long COVID Could Double Following a Second Infection – The Lancet Infectious Diseases

    101 shares
    Share 40 Tweet 25
  • Revolutionizing Optimization: Deep Learning for Complex Systems

    92 shares
    Share 37 Tweet 23

About

We bring you the latest biotechnology news from best research centers and universities around the world. Check our website.

Follow us

Recent News

Fertility Preservation Challenges in Endometrioid Cancer Cases

Allostatic Load Links to Kidney Cancer Risk

Ecological Risk, Exercise Atmosphere, and Student Fitness

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 65 other subscribers
  • Contact Us

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Homepages
    • Home Page 1
    • Home Page 2
  • News
  • National
  • Business
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Science

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.