• HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
Tuesday, January 13, 2026
BIOENGINEER.ORG
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
No Result
View All Result
Bioengineer.org
No Result
View All Result
Home NEWS Science News Chemistry

How good are protein disorder prediction programs actually?

Bioengineer by Bioengineer
April 5, 2019
in Chemistry
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0
IMAGE
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on RedditShare on Telegram

IMAGE

Credit: Dr. Jakob Toudahl and Assoc. Prof. Frans Mulder at Department of Chemistry and Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center, Aarhus University.

Disorder in proteins is vital for biological function, and structural disorder in protein is more pervasive than you might think. Proteins with disordered regions may also be sticky, and clump together inside and between cells, and are directly implicated in a number of neurodegenerative diseases. Thus, being able to identify disordered regions in proteins is highly important.

Unfortunately, it is challenging and time-consuming to characterie the structural propensities of polypeptides experimentally, and therefore bioinformatics methods for predicting protein disorder from sequence are indispensable.

Over recent years many bioinformaticians have therefore constructed algorithms to differentiate peptide sequences that will fold from those that do not, and these algorithms can be based on various ‘features’, derived from physicochemical parameters (like charge or hydrophobicity of an amino acid) as well as looking at evolutionary relatedness.

Now that many such prediction programs have become available, it is of obvious value to have some kind of benchmark to validate and test the predictions. To resolve this quandary, Nielsen and Mulder generated and validated a representative experimental benchmarking set of site-specific and continuous disorder, using deposited NMR chemical shift data for more than a hundred selected proteins. They then analysed the performance of 26 widely-used disorder prediction methods and found that these vary noticeably.

The thorough comparison presented in their research will help protein scientists around the globe to make better informed choices about which programmes are best to use.

###

Read about the study in Scientific Reports: Quality and bias of protein disorder predictors.

For further information, please contact

Dr. Jakob Toudahl Nielsen

Department of Chemistry and Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center

[email protected] – +45 29938501 –

Associate Professor Frans Mulder

Department of Chemistry and Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center

[email protected] – +45 20725238 –

Media Contact
Frans Mulder
[email protected]

Original Source

http://inano.au.dk/about/news-events/news/show/artikel/how-good-are-protein-disorder-prediction-programmes-actually/

Related Journal Article

http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41644-w

Tags: BiochemistryBioinformaticsChemistry/Physics/Materials SciencesMolecular Biology
Share12Tweet8Share2ShareShareShare2

Related Posts

blank

Thermal [2+2] Cycloaddition Builds Gem-Difluoro Bicycloalkanes

January 13, 2026
blank

Cobalt-Catalyzed Thioester Coupling via Siloxycarbene

January 12, 2026

Advancing Alkene Chemistry: Homologative Difunctionalization Breakthrough

January 8, 2026

Biocompatible Ligand Enables Safe In-Cell Protein Arylation

January 8, 2026
Please login to join discussion

POPULAR NEWS

  • Enhancing Spiritual Care Education in Nursing Programs

    154 shares
    Share 62 Tweet 39
  • PTSD, Depression, Anxiety in Childhood Cancer Survivors, Parents

    147 shares
    Share 59 Tweet 37
  • Robotic Ureteral Reconstruction: A Novel Approach

    72 shares
    Share 29 Tweet 18
  • Study Reveals Lipid Accumulation in ME/CFS Cells

    52 shares
    Share 21 Tweet 13

About

We bring you the latest biotechnology news from best research centers and universities around the world. Check our website.

Follow us

Recent News

Optimizing Pleurotus djamor Polysaccharides for Health Benefits

Global Sarcocystis Infection in Pigs: Trends and Predictions

Osimertinib ± Savolitinib in MET-EGFR NSCLC Trial

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 71 other subscribers
  • Contact Us

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Homepages
    • Home Page 1
    • Home Page 2
  • News
  • National
  • Business
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Science

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.