In the realm of global biodiversity conservation, a fresh paradigm is emerging that challenges long-held conventions about where and how restoration should occur. Traditionally, conservation efforts have concentrated on expansive, remote protected areas, distant from the urban sprawl that now houses the majority of humanity. However, a transformative approach known as “urban rewilding” is gaining traction, promising to reverse the alarming biodiversity losses occurring in our rapidly expanding cities. This initiative not only redefines the boundaries of conservation but also reimagines the relationship between humans and nature in densely populated environments.
At its core, urban rewilding involves the strategic reintroduction of animal species into small, often fragmented patches of habitat embedded within or adjacent to urban landscapes. Unlike traditional conservation, which often prioritizes large-scale wilderness preservation, this approach focuses on the ecological revitalization of cities themselves. Researchers argue that by reestablishing faunal communities in urban settings, these localized ecosystems can attain heightened levels of ‘wildness’ — an intricate term encompassing biodiversity, ecological function, and complex food web interactions.
A recent comprehensive literature review underscores the novelty and necessity of such an approach. Analyzing over 2,800 conservation-related scientific articles reveals a stark disparity: while nearly two-thirds of restoration efforts emphasize vegetation-centric strategies, active reintroduction of terrestrial animals into urban environments accounts for a mere 1.2%. This disproportion highlights a significant oversight in urban ecological restoration—plants alone do not constitute the entirety of ecosystem dynamics nor can they fully regenerate trophic complexity or ecological resilience.
The fragmented nature of urban habitats poses substantial barriers to natural recolonization by wildlife. Urban green spaces frequently exist as isolated “islands” amid concrete and asphalt, limiting animal movement and genetic flow. Without deliberate reintroduction efforts, critical faunal species face insurmountable obstacles in reestablishing viable populations. Therefore, urban rewilding calls for intentional interventions, not only to augment biodiversity but also to facilitate intricate ecological interactions that are foundational to ecosystem health.
Urban rewilding thus represents a holistic paradigm shift, moving beyond plant-centric restoration towards comprehensive ecosystem reconstruction. Crucially, it challenges the conventional dichotomy between “wilderness” and urbanity by asserting that nature’s complexity can and should coexist alongside human development. This approach echoes emerging ecological theories that recognize urban areas as dynamic landscapes with untapped potential for biodiversity enhancement and ecosystem services.
In addition to ecological benefits, urban rewilding fosters profound human-nature connections. By bringing wildlife back into spaces where people live and work, rewilding initiatives offer unique opportunities for community engagement and stewardship. This proximity cultivates a sense of ownership and collaboration among urban residents, transforming conservation from a distant scientific endeavor into an everyday cultural experience. The implications extend beyond environmentalism, touching upon social well-being and communal identity.
Empirical studies emphasize that interaction with nature, particularly wildlife, in urban contexts yields measurable health benefits. These range from improved mental health outcomes and stress reduction to enhanced physical activity and social cohesion. Rewilding efforts, therefore, hold promise not only as biodiversity rescue missions but also as catalysts for public health and urban livability. Integrating ecological restoration with human well-being strategies represents an innovative, cross-disciplinary frontier in urban planning.
The scientists advocating for urban rewilding highlight the method’s capacity to complement broader restoration programs. Rather than supplanting large-scale wilderness initiatives, urban rewilding enriches the overall conservation mosaic by targeting densely populated regions where biodiversity losses are most acute and where human pressures are greatest. In this synergy, cities become critical nodes in global ecological networks, facilitating species recovery and genetic exchange across scales.
Technically, successful urban rewilding demands careful species selection, habitat enhancement, and adaptive management. Candidate species must be resilient to urban stressors, capable of thriving in smaller, patchy habitats, and contribute meaningfully to ecological functions such as pollination, seed dispersal, pest control, or predation. Additionally, rewilders must address challenges such as human-wildlife conflicts, disease transmission, and socioeconomic factors to ensure sustainable coexistence.
Integrative planning also incorporates green infrastructure design, connectivity corridors, and habitat heterogeneity to maximize ecological viability. Advances in spatial ecology, remote sensing, and community science underpin these efforts, allowing practitioners to monitor reintroduction success and ecosystem responses in real time. This data-driven, iterative approach ensures that urban rewilding evolves in alignment with both ecological goals and human needs.
The urgency of urban rewilding is underscored by demographic trends. With projections estimating that 70% of the global population will reside in urban areas within the coming decades, cities are poised to become frontline arenas in the fight against biodiversity decline. Ignoring this reality risks perpetuating biodiversity deficits and disconnecting future generations from the natural world. Embracing urban rewilding aligns conservation with urban development, offering a blueprint for resilient, biodiverse cities of the future.
Critically, urban rewilding transcends ecological restoration by redefining cultural perceptions of wildlife in cities. It challenges prevailing narratives that frame urban fauna as pests or nuisances, advocating instead for their recognition as vital ecosystem actors and contributors to urban quality of life. This sociocultural dimension is essential to garnering public support, securing funding, and embedding rewilding within policy frameworks.
In conclusion, urban rewilding emerges as an innovative and necessary response to the intertwined challenges of biodiversity loss and urban expansion. By reintroducing animal species into city landscapes, this approach reconstructs functional ecosystems, enriches human experiences with nature, and strengthens the resilience of both ecological and social systems. As the planet urbanizes at an unprecedented rate, urban rewilding offers a hopeful vision where cities are not ecological deserts but vibrant bastions of life, co-created by humans and wildlife alike.
Subject of Research: Animals
Article Title: Urban rewilding to combat global biodiversity decline
News Publication Date: 25-May-2025
Web References:
https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/biosci/biaf062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaf062
Keywords: Ecology, Applied ecology, Conservation biology, Conservation ecology
Tags: biodiversity loss in citiesconservation efforts in urban environmentsecological revitalization in urban areasenhancing urban biodiversityhuman-nature relationship in citiesinnovative conservation practicesintegrating nature into urban planningreintroduction of animal species in citiesreversing urban biodiversity declinesmall habitat restoration in urban settingsurban ecosystems and wildlifeurban rewilding strategies
