In a groundbreaking national study that sheds new light on adolescent digital behavior, researchers have identified a significant surge in sexting among U.S. teens, a trend that brings with it serious risks including coercion, privacy violations, and sextortion. Sexting, defined as the sending or receiving of sexually explicit or suggestive images or videos, has become notably more prevalent in recent years, amplified by the persistent reliance on digital communication platforms accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic and advances in artificial intelligence technologies. The findings emphasize how sexting, once considered a marginal behavior, is now deeply integrated into the social fabric of modern adolescence, raising urgent concerns for public health and digital safety.
This comprehensive study, conducted with a representative sample of 3,466 adolescents aged 13 to 17 across the United States, was a collaboration between Florida Atlantic University and the University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire. The research analyzed not only the rates of sexting but also the negative implications linked to these practices, focusing on demographic differences such as age, gender, race, and sexual orientation. Published in the prestigious Journal of Adolescent Health, the study reveals a marked increase from previous data collected in 2019, with 32.4% of respondents reporting they had received a sext and 23.9% stating they had sent one. These numbers underscore a rapid escalation in engagement with sexting behaviors within a remarkably short period.
One of the study’s pivotal insights is the contextual importance of sexting partners. Adolescents who exchanged sexts with individuals outside of their romantic relationships faced disproportionately higher risks. Specifically, they were more than 13 times likelier to have their explicit images shared without their consent and nearly five times more susceptible to sextortion—a form of digital coercion where victims are threatened with the dissemination of private images in order to extract additional images, sexual favors, money, or other demands. This finding draws attention to the complex dynamics of digital intimacy and the heightened vulnerability posed by interactions beyond trusted partnerships.
The role of gender and sexual orientation emerged as significant variables in sexting behavior and victimization. Males were considerably more likely to both send and receive sexts compared to females. Additionally, non-heterosexual youth exhibited higher rates of participation than their heterosexual peers. Racial and ethnic disparities were also evident; white and multiracial adolescents demonstrated the highest overall rates of sexting activity. These demographic distinctions are critical for tailoring intervention strategies, as they highlight diverse experiences and potential cultural factors influencing online sexual expression.
Intriguingly, age-related trends in sexting do not follow a simple linear progression. While older teens generally reported higher engagement levels, early adolescents, including 13- and 15-year-olds, also showed notably high involvement rates. This suggests that digital sexual communication begins earlier in adolescence than many might assume, which calls for earlier educational efforts to prepare youth for the realities of online socialization and to minimize harm during these formative years.
The prevalence of sexting requests—instances where teens were asked to send explicit images—exceeded the act of sending itself. Approximately 30% of respondents indicated they had been solicited for sexts, while nearly 20% admitted to requesting such images from others. Boys were more frequently positioned as both requesters and recipients of these solicitations. Furthermore, non-heterosexual youth were particularly vulnerable to requests, indicating they may encounter greater pressure and risk in digital sexual exchanges, an aspect that demands nuanced understanding within sexual minority youth communities.
Nonconsensual sharing of intimate images emerged as a pervasive issue. Nearly half (46.8%) of teens who had sent a sext revealed that their images were subsequently distributed without their consent, breaching personal privacy with significant psychological and social repercussions. Moreover, one-third of those who had received sexts admitted to sharing images without permission, illustrating a troubling culture of disregard for digital consent. The study found that boys, heterosexual youth, and white teens were more likely to report both victimization through unauthorized sharing and participation in disseminating such content, highlighting complex patterns of agency and harm.
Younger adolescents appear disproportionately impacted by nonconsensual dissemination, with over 60% of 13-year-olds experiencing unauthorized sharing of their sent images compared to about 41% of 17-year-olds. This elevated risk for younger teens may be attributed to developmental factors such as immature impulse control and a limited capacity to foresee long-term consequences, reinforcing the need for interventions that address digital literacy and risk mitigation from early adolescence.
Sextortion, a particularly disturbing form of digital sexual exploitation, is remarkably common among teens involved in sexting. Nearly half (49.6%) of youth who had sent sexts faced sextortion attempts, while nearly one-third of those who received sexts admitted to engaging in sextortion themselves. These findings reveal a cyclical pattern of perpetration and victimization within youth digital culture. Gender and sexual orientation influenced experiences with sextortion, with boys and heterosexual youth more likely to be both victims and perpetrators. Racially, white and multiracial youth were identified as both the most targeted and the most active in sextortion activities.
The implications of these findings resonate profoundly with educators, policymakers, and parents. Traditional admonitions like “don’t sext” are insufficient and ineffective, given the normalization of sexting in adolescent peer groups. Instead, there is a pressing need for comprehensive education emphasizing digital consent, personal boundaries, and privacy protection. These educational frameworks must enable youth to navigate the complexities of digital sexual communication safely, respecting their autonomy while mitigating harm.
Authors Sameer Hinduja, Ph.D., and Justin Patchin, Ph.D., pioneers in cyberbullying research, advocate for a balanced approach that affirms that most youth do not engage in sexting but prepares those who do to recognize and confront potential abuses. This includes fostering critical skills in digital literacy and emotional regulation to empower adolescents to make informed decisions and respond effectively to coercive or nonconsensual behavior.
Central to reducing harm is cultivating an environment where teens are supported in developing both online and offline healthy habits. This goes beyond punitive measures and centers on empowering young people with knowledge and tools that safeguard their well-being in an increasingly digital world. By promoting open dialogue about digital sexuality, consent, and privacy, society can help adolescents build resilience against sexting-associated harms while respecting their evolving identities and relationships.
In conclusion, this study highlights sexting as a widespread phenomenon embedded in the social lives of many teenagers, underscoring both the opportunities and considerable risks that digital sexual communication presents. The findings call for urgent, multidimensional strategies that incorporate education, parental guidance, and policy reform to address the growing challenges of sexting, sextortion, and nonconsensual image sharing. As digital technologies continue to evolve, so too must our approaches to safeguarding adolescent health and dignity in this complex landscape.
Subject of Research: People
Article Title: When Sexting Goes Wrong: The Extent of Nonconsensual Sharing and Sextortion Among U.S. Teens
News Publication Date: 7-Feb-2026
Web References:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X25008237
References:
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. (2026). When Sexting Goes Wrong: The Extent of Nonconsensual Sharing and Sextortion Among U.S. Teens. Journal of Adolescent Health.
Image Credits: Florida Atlantic University
Keywords: Adolescents, Social research, Sociological data, Sexuality, Social psychology, Human social behavior, Digital data, Technology, Health and medicine, Communications, Demography, Age groups, Children, Education, Psychological science, Behavioral psychology, Developmental psychology, Emotions
Tags: adolescent privacy violationsartificial intelligence and sextingcoercion in sexting practicesdemographic differences in sexting behaviordigital safety for teenagersFlorida Atlantic University researchimpact of COVID-19 on teen behaviorJournal of Adolescent Health findingsprivacy concerns in digital communicationpublic health implications of sextingsextortion risks among adolescentsteen sexting trends
