Nanomedicine stands at the forefront of modern healthcare innovations, particularly in diagnostic imaging and targeted therapeutics. These cutting-edge medicines harness engineered nanoparticles, often metallic in nature such as iron or gold, to achieve functionalities unattainable by conventional drugs. Notably, these particles function as contrast agents in imaging techniques like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), serve as nutritional supplements, and are utilized as highly efficient carriers in drug delivery systems. Their extraordinary physicochemical properties allow nanomedicines to accumulate precisely in diseased tissues, including tumors, thereby enhancing detection and treatment efficacy while minimizing systemic side effects. However, these very properties that empower nanomedicines also create analytical and regulatory challenges that must be rigorously addressed to ensure their safety and quality.
Current global pharmaceutical guidelines, including those set forth by the International Council for Harmonization (ICH), focus predominantly on the total concentration of elemental impurities within medicinal formulations. This traditional approach does not differentiate between the diverse chemical species present, such as free metal ions, nanoparticulate forms, or aggregates of varying size. Such differentiation is of paramount importance due to the distinct biological behaviors and toxicological profiles associated with each species. For instance, free metal ions may induce higher toxicity or undesired side effects compared to their nanoparticle counterparts, affecting patient safety and drug performance. Regulatory oversight, therefore, demands more sophisticated methods capable of dissecting these subtle yet critical differences.
Responding to this pressing need, a research team led by Assistant Professor Yu-ki Tanaka from Chiba University has pioneered an advanced analytical technique that meticulously distinguishes between ionic forms and nanoparticle states of metals within nanomedicines. Published in the esteemed journal Talanta on April 8, 2025, this breakthrough enables precise quantification of elemental impurities and particle size distribution in complex pharmaceutical formulations. The interdisciplinary study, co-authored by Yasumitsu Ogra and Sana Hasegawa, harnesses the power of asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation (AF4) in tandem with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), offering an unprecedented window into the internal composition of metal-based nanomedicines.
.adsslot_eMKdo7zptE{ width:728px !important; height:90px !important; }
@media (max-width:1199px) { .adsslot_eMKdo7zptE{ width:468px !important; height:60px !important; } }
@media (max-width:767px) { .adsslot_eMKdo7zptE{ width:320px !important; height:50px !important; } }
ADVERTISEMENT
The ingenuity of their method lies in the innovative exploitation of the AF4 instrument’s initial “focus step.” During this phase, nanoparticles are momentarily trapped within the AF4 channel by two opposing hydrodynamic flows, while a semipermeable membrane permits the escape of dissolved ions. This selective filtration effectively removes free metal ions from the sample, thereby allowing their concentration to be independently assessed. Subsequent to ion removal, the AF4 process resumes its standard separation mechanism, sorting retained nanoparticles based on hydrodynamic size with exceptional resolution. Coupled to an ICP-MS detector, the system then quantifies elemental content across particle size fractions, discerning free ions, small colloidal species, and larger nanoparticulate aggregates within a single integrated assay.
Validation of this analytical workflow was conducted using Resovist®, a clinically approved iron-based contrast agent extensively employed in liver MRI diagnostics. Remarkably, the researchers found that merely 0.022% of iron existed in ionic form within Resovist®, corresponding to approximately 6.3 micrograms per milliliter. This minuscule fraction is substantially below toxicological concern thresholds, underscoring the formulation’s safety profile. Size distribution analysis confirmed that active iron oxide nanoparticles measured below 30 nanometers, with minor aggregates near 50 nanometers—sizes consistent with optimal biological performance and minimal risk of rapid clearance or immunogenicity. Notably, no significant quantities of large aggregates were detected, an outcome suggestive of rigorous manufacturing quality and product stability.
Further demonstrating versatility, the technique was successfully applied to analyze diverse metal-containing samples, encompassing both negatively charged ions such as silicon-derived species and positively charged ions including iron. This broad applicability paves the way for comprehensive safety assessments across multiple industrial sectors, including cosmetics, dietary supplements, and environmental monitoring. The capacity to differentiate particle forms and elemental states empowers regulators and manufacturers alike with a powerful tool for rigorous quality assurance and risk evaluation.
This technology’s union of AF4 and ICP-MS represents a paradigm shift in nanoparticle characterization, simultaneously capturing particle size distribution and elemental quantification with high sensitivity and specificity. Traditional methods, which often rely on aggregate measurements or indirect inference, lack the granularity needed to fully comprehend complex nanoparticle preparations. The integration of these two sophisticated techniques mitigates this gap, delivering real-time separation coupled with elemental analysis capable of dissecting compositional heterogeneity within nanomedicine formulations.
One of the major challenges in nanomedicine development and quality control has been the elusive nature of particle aggregates and free ions, whose variable presence can significantly influence therapeutic outcomes and safety profiles. By quantifying these entities with unparalleled precision, the methodology developed by Tanaka and his colleagues fortifies the pharmaceutical industry’s ability to meet regulatory expectations and protect patient health. Moreover, this analytical platform lays a robust foundation for continuous process improvements and batch-to-batch consistency in nanomedicine manufacturing.
Beyond clinical applications, this method holds promise for environmental safety assessments, where metal nanoparticles are increasingly prevalent due to industrial use and product incorporation. The ability to monitor both ionic forms and particulate metal species can inform risk assessments related to nanoparticle release into ecosystems, aiding in the formulation of environmental protection policies. Likewise, food safety regulators may leverage this technology to analyze metal contaminants and additives, safeguarding public health.
Assistant Professor Yu-ki Tanaka, at the forefront of this research, is a recognized expert in heavy metal analysis, toxicity evaluation, and single-cell/particle analytical techniques. With a Doctor of Science degree from Kyoto University and an extensive publication record exceeding 30 peer-reviewed articles, his work continues to influence the evolving landscape of nanomedicine characterization. His membership in prominent academic societies further attests to his active engagement within the scientific community dedicated to advancing pharmaceutical sciences.
In summary, this breakthrough analytical method represents a critical advancement in the field of nanomedicine quality control. By enabling the precise separation and quantification of elemental impurities and particle size distributions, it fills a notable void in regulatory evaluations and promotes the safe, effective use of metal-based nanotherapeutics. As the landscape of medicine continues to evolve towards increasingly sophisticated nanotechnologies, such state-of-the-art analytical innovations will be integral in transforming scientific promise into tangible clinical benefits.
Subject of Research: Not applicable
Article Title: Evaluation of elemental impurities and particle size distribution in nanomedicine using asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation hyphenated to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
News Publication Date: 8-Apr-2025
Web References:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128116
References:
Tanaka, Y.-k., Ogra, Y., & Hasegawa, S. (2025). Evaluation of elemental impurities and particle size distribution in nanomedicine using asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation hyphenated to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Talanta. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128116
Image Credits: Assistant Professor Yu-ki Tanaka from Chiba University
Keywords: Nanomedicine, asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, elemental impurities, nanoparticle characterization, metal-based nanoparticles, drug delivery, cancer therapy, Resovist®, particle size distribution, analytical chemistry, safety evaluation
Tags: composition analysis of nanomedicinescontrast agents in MRIdiagnostic imaging with nanomedicinedrug delivery systems using nanoparticleselemental impurities in pharmaceuticalsICH guidelines for nanomedicinesnanomedicine innovationsphysicochemical properties of nanoparticlesregulatory challenges in nanomedicinesafety and quality of nanomedicinestargeted therapeutics with nanoparticlestoxicological profiles of nanoparticles
