.adsslot_5ahywIlcAE{ width:728px !important; height:90px !important; }
@media (max-width:1199px) { .adsslot_5ahywIlcAE{ width:468px !important; height:60px !important; } }
@media (max-width:767px) { .adsslot_5ahywIlcAE{ width:320px !important; height:50px !important; } }
ADVERTISEMENT
The implications extend to international regulatory frameworks as well. Current carbon offset regimes and emissions trading systems predominantly address CO₂ emissions while often neglecting non-CO₂ climate forcings. Incorporating non-CO₂ mitigation potential into these policies could accelerate progress and incentivize the deployment of multifaceted climate solutions. This aligns with broader trends in climate science emphasizing holistic, system-based approaches to greenhouse gas management.
Subject of Research: Climate impacts of civil aviation and mitigation trade-offs between CO₂ and non-CO₂ emissions
Article Title: Trade-offs in aviation impacts on climate favour non-CO2 mitigation
Article References:
Prather, M.J., Gettelman, A. & Penner, J.E. Trade-offs in aviation impacts on climate favour non-CO2 mitigation. Nature (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09198-2
Image Credits: AI Generated
Tags: aviation climate impactaviation industry climate policiesaviation radiative forcingclimate-trade-off risk curvecomprehensive aviation climate solutionsgreenhouse gas emissions in aviationmethane depletion and aviationnitrogen oxides aviation effectsnon-CO₂ emissions strategiesozone formation from aviationparadigm shift in aviation emissions policypersistent contrails and climate change
