In recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the importance of integrating parents into the co-design processes of pediatric healthcare. This trend is not just a passing fad; it represents a significant shift in how healthcare systems are viewing the role of families in the treatment and management of children’s health. A recent systematic review by Suna, Tanti, Merlo, et al., published in BMC Health Services Research, delves into various co-design methodologies employed with parents, shining a light on both the successes and challenges of such approaches.
At its core, co-design in healthcare can be seen as a collaborative process that invites multiple stakeholders—especially those directly affected by health outcomes—to contribute to the design and improvement of services. In pediatric settings, this collaboration is particularly vital as it helps ensure that healthcare solutions are not only effective but also sensitive to the needs and preferences of families. The findings from the review underscore that when parents engage actively in the co-design process, healthcare providers can better tailor interventions that resonate with children’s specific requirements.
The systematic review encompassed various studies aimed at evaluating the efficacy of co-design approaches with parents. It drew from a diverse pool of healthcare settings and methodologies, showcasing how different models can yield valuable insights into parental perspectives on pediatric health services. Key themes emerged from the analysis, highlighting factors like communication, trust, and the progression of parental engagement from mere participants to active co-designers. It is important to note that the success of co-design in a healthcare context hinges on fostering an environment of mutual respect and open dialogue.
Trust emerges as a critical component in the co-design relationship between healthcare providers and parents. Many families have reported feeling marginalized or overlooked in traditional healthcare settings. By actively involving parents in the design of services, there exists an opportunity to rectify past grievances and build a more inclusive healthcare model. The review notably points out that trust can be cultivated through transparent communication and a genuine acknowledgment of parents’ insights and experiences.
Another significant finding from the systematic review is the diverse range of co-design methodologies that can be employed. These include workshops, focus groups, and community engagement activities, each offering unique advantages and challenges. The review establishes that while some methods may promote deeper engagement, others may limit participation due to logistical constraints. Thus, healthcare providers must carefully select co-design methodologies that not only align with their goals but also facilitate broad parental participation.
In reflecting on the outcomes of the co-design processes highlighted in the review, one cannot ignore the positive impact these initiatives have on health service delivery. Parents actively participating in the design process reported a greater sense of ownership over health decisions, which often leads to improved adherence to recommended interventions. This enhanced engagement can significantly improve health outcomes, as parents who feel valued and involved are more likely to implement advised changes in their children’s care routines.
Equally important is the acknowledgment of the barriers that may impede effective co-design. The review points to underlying systemic issues, such as time constraints for both healthcare professionals and parents, which can limit the extent of participation. Additionally, some parents may lack the confidence or knowledge to engage meaningfully in co-design discussions. Addressing these challenges requires innovative solutions that enable smoother interactions and cultivate an engaging environment for all parties.
As policymakers evaluate the integration of co-design in pediatric healthcare, it is essential that they consider the implications of such approaches on healthcare equity. The review suggests that inclusive co-design strategies can help bridge gaps in healthcare access and quality, particularly for marginalized communities. Involving diverse parental voices not only enriches the conversation but also brings to the forefront the varied experiences and needs of different families.
The implications of the findings extend beyond immediate healthcare practices. They invite a broader societal reflection on how we perceive and incorporate family input in healthcare settings. By placing parents at the center of the co-design process, healthcare organizations can actively promote a culture of collaboration that honors the insights and experiences of those who know their children best. Such cultural shifts can redefine the paradigm of pediatric care for the better.
Moreover, the systematic review taps into the broader discourse on patient-centered care, reinforcing the notion that involving patients—and in this case, their families—in the design and delivery of healthcare services is not merely an add-on but a necessity. As healthcare systems strive to become more responsive to individual needs, the findings from this review herald a more participatory approach to shaping health services, with parents as vital co-authors in this journey.
Ultimately, the systematic review by Suna, Tanti, Merlo, et al. serves as both a call to action and a guiding framework for the future of pediatric healthcare design. It challenges healthcare providers to rethink their conventional roles and embrace the dynamic possibilities that emerge when they actively engage families. In doing so, it paints a hopeful picture of a healthcare landscape where collaboration transforms care delivery into a shared journey towards better outcomes for children.
In conclusion, as this review continues to inspire discussions in the healthcare community, it is clear that the time has come to reaffirm the value of parental involvement in co-design processes. By investing in these collaborative endeavors, we stand to create a more effective, compassionate, and equitable pediatric healthcare system that truly prioritizes the well-being of our children.
Subject of Research: Co-design approaches with parents in pediatric healthcare.
Article Title: Evaluating co-design approaches with parents in paediatric healthcare: a systematic review.
Article References:
Suna, J., Tanti, D., Merlo, G. et al. Evaluating co-design approaches with parents in paediatric healthcare: a systematic review.
BMC Health Serv Res 25, 1416 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13495-x
Image Credits: AI Generated
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-13495-x
Keywords: Co-design, pediatric healthcare, parental involvement, healthcare equity, patient-centered care.
Tags: benefits of parent participation in healthcare designchallenges of parent co-design in healthcareco-design methodologies in healthcarecollaborative healthcare solutions for childrenenhancing healthcare outcomes for children through co-designfamily engagement in children’s healthimproving pediatric healthcare through co-designintegrating parents in healthcare decision-makingparent involvement in pediatric healthcarestakeholder engagement in pediatric settingssystematic review of co-design in pediatricstailoring healthcare interventions to family needs
