• HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
Tuesday, September 22, 2026
BIOENGINEER.ORG
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
No Result
View All Result
Bioengineer.org
No Result
View All Result
Home NEWS Science News

Study shows influence of surgeons on likelihood of removal of healthy breast after breast cancer dia

Bioengineer by Bioengineer
September 13, 2017
in Science News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on RedditShare on Telegram

Attending surgeons can have a strong influence on whether a patient undergoes contralateral prophylactic mastectomy after a diagnosis of breast cancer, according to a study published by JAMA Surgery.

Use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) for the treatment of breast cancer has increased markedly over the last decade in the wake of greater patient awareness of the procedure. Currently, about 20 percent of patients receive CPM, representing about half of those who get any mastectomy. Little is known about the influence of the attending surgeon on variations in receipt of CPM. Steven J. Katz, M.D., M.P.H., of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and colleagues surveyed 7,810 women with stages 0 to II breast cancer and 488 attending surgeons identified by the patients to quantify the influence of the attending surgeon on rates of CPM and clinician attitudes that explained it. Surveys were sent approximately two months after surgery.

A total of 5,080 women responded to the survey (70 percent response rate), and 377 surgeons responded (77 percent response rate). The researchers found that the individual attending surgeon explained a large amount (20 percent) of the overall variation in CPM use: the estimated rate of CPM was 34 percent for surgeons who least favored initial breast conservation and were least reluctant to perform CPM vs 4 percent for surgeons who most favored initial breast conservation and were most reluctant to perform CPM. One-quarter (25 percent) of the surgeon influence was explained by attending attitudes about initial recommendations for surgery and responses to patient requests for CPM.

The study notes some limitations, including that despite high survey response rates, there was inevitable decay in the sample given the requirement for completed surveys from both the surgeon and the patient.

"Our findings reinforce the need to address better ways to communicate with patients with regard to their beliefs about the benefits of more extensive surgery and their reactions to the management plan including surgeon training and deployment of decision aids," the authors write.

###

For more details and to read the full study, please visit the For The Media website.

(doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.3415)

Editor's Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.

Media Contact

Nicole Fawcett
[email protected]
@JAMA_current

http://www.jamamedia.org

Share12Tweet8Share2ShareShareShare2

Related Posts

Elite Powerlifting Study Reveals the Myth of the Bodyweight Multiplier

September 22, 2026

Evidence Under Fire: New Debate Over How Medication Optimisation Tools Should Be Judged

September 22, 2026

Fruit Fly Genomes Reveal How Circadian Clocks Evolve and Adapt

September 22, 2026

AI Learns to Distrust Its Own Illusions: CLIP Helps Models Adapt Without Source Data

September 22, 2026
Please login to join discussion

POPULAR NEWS

  • Elite Powerlifting Study Reveals the Myth of the Bodyweight Multiplier

    29 shares
    Share 12 Tweet 7
  • Evidence Under Fire: New Debate Over How Medication Optimisation Tools Should Be Judged

    29 shares
    Share 12 Tweet 7
  • Fruit Fly Genomes Reveal How Circadian Clocks Evolve and Adapt

    29 shares
    Share 12 Tweet 7
  • AI Learns to Distrust Its Own Illusions: CLIP Helps Models Adapt Without Source Data

    29 shares
    Share 12 Tweet 7

About

We bring you the latest biotechnology news from best research centers and universities around the world. Check our website.

Follow us

Recent News

Elite Powerlifting Study Reveals the Myth of the Bodyweight Multiplier

Evidence Under Fire: New Debate Over How Medication Optimisation Tools Should Be Judged

Fruit Fly Genomes Reveal How Circadian Clocks Evolve and Adapt

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 85 other subscribers
  • Contact Us

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Homepages
    • Home Page 1
    • Home Page 2
  • News
  • National
  • Business
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Science

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.