• HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
Wednesday, October 21, 2026
BIOENGINEER.ORG
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
No Result
View All Result
Bioengineer.org
No Result
View All Result
Home NEWS Science News Technology

Modeled hybrid PVT/OTEC plant breaks even only with low-cost collectors or recovered heat

by
October 21, 2026
in Technology
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Modeled hybrid PVT/OTEC plant breaks even only with low-cost collectors or recovered heat

Solar-boosted ocean power plant fails the price test, but one clever twist wins

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on RedditShare on Telegram

A computational techno-economic study found that a hybrid photovoltaic-thermal and ocean thermal energy conversion plant was not economically advantageous over an uncooled photovoltaic array paired with a standalone OTEC plant under central cost assumptions. The verified break-even electricity price ranged from $1.77 to $3.12 per kilowatt-hour along the optimized trade-off at the design site, above the $0.30–$0.80 per kilowatt-hour diesel-generation cost reported for remote Indonesian grids.

The study modeled a closed ammonia OTEC cycle whose evaporator received heat from a PVT field through an intermediate heat exchanger. The PVT coolant simultaneously cooled the photovoltaic cells and delivered recovered heat to the OTEC cycle. The analysis compared this hybrid with Case A, an uncooled photovoltaic array beside a standalone OTEC plant, and Case B, an actively cooled array that rejected its recovered heat to ambient.

Researchers optimized collector aperture area, specific heat-transfer-fluid flow, evaporator conductance and one of five commercial photovoltaic technologies. NSGA-III simultaneously optimized net plant power, system exergy efficiency and the crossover price, defined as the break-even electricity price for the incremental hybrid investment. Annual energy was calculated from long-term monthly solar climatology, with no thermal storage credited at night.

Machine-learning surrogates replaced repeated high-fidelity calculations during the search. Gaussian-process models were selected for the physical regression targets, while gradient-boosted trees classified whether a cycle solution existed. The annual hybrid energy increment relative to the uncooled reference had a cross-validated R² of 0.9980 and mean absolute error of 0.19 kWh per square metre per year.

Among 26 front designs re-evaluated with the full model, 25 were feasible. The surrogate overestimated the crossover price relative to the uncooled reference by a mean $0.002 per kilowatt-hour, and its Spearman rank correlation with verified values was 0.9985. Verification also identified one design that violated the evaporator approach limit by 0.012 K, which was removed from the reported results.

The verified Pareto front covered net hybrid outputs of 39–588 kW and exergy efficiencies of 11.6–21.7%. A selected knee design used 2,411 m² of collectors with TOPCon cells and delivered 459 kW at 19.7% exergy efficiency, but had a verified crossover price of $2.53 per kilowatt-hour. Multicrystalline silicon produced the lowest crossover price because its larger temperature coefficient produced a greater benefit from cooling; efficiency alone did not determine the ranking.

Relative to the actively cooled array, routing recovered heat to the OTEC evaporator had a coupling crossover price of $0.12–$0.13 per kilowatt-hour along the design-site front, below the reported diesel-cost range. This comparison excluded the cost of obtaining the cooled PVT field because that hardware was common to both configurations. The result supports using recovered heat once a PVT field has been justified for other reasons, rather than using OTEC coupling alone to justify the field.

At an electricity price of $0.40 per kilowatt-hour, the break-even PVT-specific cost was $43–$82 per square metre, compared with a documented range of about $200–$550 per square metre. A 20,000-draw Monte Carlo analysis produced a 5th–95th percentile crossover-price range of $1.76–$3.74 per kilowatt-hour, and every draw exceeded $0.80 per kilowatt-hour.

The analysis was limited to a steady-state model, one ammonia-based plant scale, no thermal storage and uncertain utility-scale PVT procurement costs. Collector areas above 2,000 m² and conditions outside the design-site climatology were extrapolations, and the diesel range was regional rather than a site-specific avoided-cost estimate.

Subject of Research: Techno-economic optimization of a hybrid photovoltaic-thermal and ocean thermal energy conversion plant

Article Title: Locating the economic threshold of a hybrid PVT/OTEC plant: a surrogate-assisted multi-objective optimization with high-fidelity verification

Article References: Ahmadi, M., Aghanajafi, C., & Vojdani, M. M. (2026). Locating the economic threshold of a hybrid PVT/OTEC plant: a surrogate-assisted multi-objective optimization with high-fidelity verification. Results in Engineering, 32, Article 113607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.113607

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2026.113607

Keywords: PVT/OTEC hybrid, photovoltaic-thermal, ocean thermal energy, techno-economic optimization, crossover price, surrogate modeling, NSGA-III, high-fidelity verification, Locating, economic, threshold, hybrid

News Source: Denise Maddox. (October 21, 2026). Modeled hybrid PVT/OTEC plant breaks even only with low-cost collectors or recovered heat. Scienmag.

Tags: crossover priceeconomichigh-fidelity verificationHybridLocatingNSGA-IIIocean thermal energyphotovoltaic-thermalPVT/OTEC hybridsurrogate modelingtechno-economic optimizationthreshold
Share12Tweet7Share2ShareShareShare1

Related Posts

Process simulation favors recycled refinery hydrogen for urea-plant emissions cuts

Process simulation favors recycled refinery hydrogen for urea-plant emissions cuts

October 21, 2026
IoT-controlled hydroponic maize system produced green fodder in three sequential validation cycles

IoT-controlled hydroponic maize system produced green fodder in three sequential validation cycles

October 21, 2026

pH-programmed MXene treatment alters PET textile interface and multifunctional performance

October 21, 2026

Square-lattice pentamode metamaterial for acoustic cloaking: design and validation

October 21, 2026

POPULAR NEWS

  • Four self-management profiles emerge in H-type hypertension

    Four self-management profiles emerge in H-type hypertension

    29 shares
    Share 12 Tweet 7
  • Transcriptome SNPs reveal differentiation among 13 conifer provenances

    29 shares
    Share 12 Tweet 7
  • Process simulation favors recycled refinery hydrogen for urea-plant emissions cuts

    29 shares
    Share 12 Tweet 7
  • Modeled hybrid PVT/OTEC plant breaks even only with low-cost collectors or recovered heat

    29 shares
    Share 12 Tweet 7

About

We bring you the latest biotechnology news from best research centers and universities around the world. Check our website.

Follow us

Recent News

Four self-management profiles emerge in H-type hypertension

Transcriptome SNPs reveal differentiation among 13 conifer provenances

Process simulation favors recycled refinery hydrogen for urea-plant emissions cuts

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 85 other subscribers
  • Contact Us

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Homepages
    • Home Page 1
    • Home Page 2
  • News
  • National
  • Business
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Science

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.