In a world where medical advances have significantly boosted the survival rates of preterm infants, a new frontier of pediatric research is gaining critical attention: the long-term developmental outcomes and school readiness of children born before term. While nearly 7 to 9 percent of children worldwide enter the world prematurely—defined as before 37 weeks of gestational age—the journey to full health and developmental success does not conclude with survival. Of paramount concern is the roughly 15 percent of these preterm births occurring before 32 weeks gestational age, a subgroup classified as very preterm, whose early arrival can profoundly disrupt the intricate neurodevelopmental processes unfolding in late gestation.
The final trimester of pregnancy represents a pivotal epoch characterized by rapid brain growth, neurogenesis, synaptogenesis, and the maturation of complex neural circuits that underpin future cognitive, motor, and socioemotional functions. Preterm birth abruptly halts this in utero progression, thrusting the immature brain into an environment markedly different from the protective confines of the womb. The early neonatal period in intensive care units (NICUs) exposes these vulnerable infants to an array of stressors—ranging from altered sensory inputs and fluctuating oxygen levels to acute medical illnesses—that collectively exert profound influences on brain development. This disruption is not isolated; it is further compounded by social determinants, including socioeconomic status and post-discharge environmental factors, all of which interplay to shape the trajectory of a preterm child’s neurodevelopmental health.
Recent research underscores the crucial importance of school readiness as a holistic indicator of developmental progress at the threshold of formal education. School readiness synthesizes genetic predispositions with postnatal experiences and environmental exposures, serving as a predictive marker for academic pathways and lifelong learning potentials. For children born preterm, this juncture is particularly fraught with challenges. Empirical data reveal that these children face heightened risks of academic underachievement, frequently necessitating grade repetition and remedial educational assistance. Such outcomes underscore a pressing need to pivot from reactive educational interventions toward proactive, early support strategies aimed at mitigating developmental vulnerabilities before school entry.
The myriad challenges encountered by preterm children at school entry and beyond are multifactorial. Neurological sequelae such as impaired executive function, language delays, motor impairments, and attention deficits are prevalent and interconnected. These impairments stem from the compromised maturation of cortical and subcortical structures during critical windows of brain development. Structural and functional neuroimaging studies have illustrated alterations in white matter integrity, reduced cortical volumes, and disrupted connectivity in networks that subserve cognition and behavior. Coupled with the psychosocial complexities encountered by families navigating intensive care and follow-up care pathways, these factors create a nexus of risk for diminished developmental outcomes.
To address these challenges, the paradigm in neonatal and early childhood care must extend beyond survival metrics to encompass comprehensive developmental support frameworks. Emerging evidence suggests that multidisciplinary interventions initiated during or immediately after NICU discharge—targeting sensory regulation, motor skills, language enrichment, and caregiver-child interactions—hold promise for enhancing developmental trajectories. Furthermore, addressing modifiable social risk factors through family-centered care, enhanced access to early childhood education programs, and community support initiatives is equally integral for bolstering school readiness.
Understanding the biological underpinnings of preterm brain vulnerability is vital to informing effective intervention design. The brain’s rapid volumetric expansion during the third trimester involves dynamic processes such as dendritic arborization, synaptic pruning, and myelination. Preterm birth interrupts these processes, leading to a cascade of neurodevelopmental adaptations and maladaptations. Notably, the immature oligodendrocytes responsible for myelin formation are highly susceptible to hypoxic and inflammatory insults common in preterm neonates. Consequently, diffuse white matter injury, often termed encephalopathy of prematurity, emerges as a hallmark lesion correlating with later cognitive and motor deficits.
Environmental stimuli during the NICU stay wield powerful influences on neuronal wiring and sensory programming. The sensory milieu in neonatal care units—characterized by variable lighting, noise levels, tactile experiences, and caregiving interactions—differs markedly from intrauterine conditions. These sensory exposures can either facilitate neural maturation or exacerbate developmental disturbances. Research indicates that structured developmental care models emphasizing minimal sensory overload and promoting positive parent-infant engagement contribute favorably to neurobehavioral outcomes.
Academic trajectories of preterm children are often hindered by subtle yet pervasive neurodevelopmental impairments. Even when overt disabilities are absent, deficits in attention regulation, processing speed, working memory, and socioemotional skills impede adaptive learning behaviors in classroom settings. Therefore, early identification of at-risk children via neurodevelopmental assessments prior to school enrollment is indispensable. Such assessments enable timely referral to targeted interventions that encompass cognitive training, behavioral therapies, and educational accommodations tailored to individual profiles.
The role of social determinants cannot be overstated in shaping developmental outcomes for preterm children. Families with higher socioeconomic status often have greater access to quality early intervention services, educational resources, and stable home environments conducive to learning. Conversely, children born preterm into socially disadvantaged contexts face compounded risks due to limited healthcare access, increased parental stress, and environmental instability. Effective policy initiatives must thus bridge healthcare and educational systems to ensure equitable support across socioeconomic strata.
This comprehensive approach to nurturing school readiness in preterm populations emphasizes the integration of medical follow-up with early childhood developmental services. Intercare communication between neonatologists, pediatricians, educators, and allied health professionals creates a continuum of care attuned to evolving child needs. Family education and empowerment constitute central pillars, furnishing caregivers with knowledge and skills to advocate and scaffold their child’s growth through pivotal developmental periods.
The implications of this body of research transcend individual outcomes and resonate with public health strategies worldwide. Investing in early detection and interventions tailored to preterm infants represents a cost-effective avenue to reduce the burden of special education needs, enhance inclusive schooling, and promote lifelong socioeconomic well-being. Moreover, the burgeoning field of precision medicine in neonatology offers potential for personalized therapeutic strategies based on genetic and epigenetic profiling.
Advances in neuroimaging and biomarker discovery herald new frontiers in understanding the complexities of preterm brain development. Functional MRI, diffusion tensor imaging, and electrophysiological studies elucidate neural network alterations that inform prognosis and therapeutic responsiveness. Molecular analyses examining inflammatory mediators, oxidative stress markers, and epigenetic modifications could further refine risk stratification and intervention timing.
As the global burden of preterm birth persists, interdisciplinary collaboration between researchers, clinicians, educators, and policymakers is imperative. Developing standardized frameworks for assessing school readiness specific to the preterm population will enhance research comparability and intervention efficacy. Such frameworks must account for the heterogeneity in gestational age, neonatal complications, and environmental contexts.
In summation, the narrative on school readiness in children born preterm is evolving from one of vulnerability to one of opportunity. Recognizing the unique neurodevelopmental challenges posed by premature birth opens pathways to optimized, tailored support systems that foster resilience and academic success. Harnessing the synergy of modern neonatology, developmental neuroscience, and educational science promises to transform the lifelong prospects of this growing and diverse population.
Subject of Research:
School readiness and neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm-born children, focusing on developmental risks, environmental influences, and interventions to optimize academic achievement.
Article Title:
School readiness in children born preterm.
Article References:
Raghuram, K., Bando, N. & Janus, M. School readiness in children born preterm. Pediatr Res (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-04421-2
Image Credits: AI Generated
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-04421-2
Tags: challenges in supporting preterm children’s school readinesscognitive development in children born prematurelydevelopmental outcomes of preterm infantsearly intervention strategies for preterm infantsgestational age and child developmentimpact of NICU environment on brain developmentlong-term effects of preterm birth on educationneurodevelopmental challenges in very preterm infantsneurogenesis and synaptogenesis in preterm infantspediatric research on preterm birthschool readiness in premature childrensocioemotional development in preterm children
