• HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
Friday, June 26, 2026
BIOENGINEER.ORG
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
No Result
View All Result
Bioengineer.org
No Result
View All Result
Home NEWS Science News Chemistry

How good are protein disorder prediction programs actually?

Bioengineer by Bioengineer
April 5, 2019
in Chemistry
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0
IMAGE
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on RedditShare on Telegram

IMAGE

Credit: Dr. Jakob Toudahl and Assoc. Prof. Frans Mulder at Department of Chemistry and Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center, Aarhus University.

Disorder in proteins is vital for biological function, and structural disorder in protein is more pervasive than you might think. Proteins with disordered regions may also be sticky, and clump together inside and between cells, and are directly implicated in a number of neurodegenerative diseases. Thus, being able to identify disordered regions in proteins is highly important.

Unfortunately, it is challenging and time-consuming to characterie the structural propensities of polypeptides experimentally, and therefore bioinformatics methods for predicting protein disorder from sequence are indispensable.

Over recent years many bioinformaticians have therefore constructed algorithms to differentiate peptide sequences that will fold from those that do not, and these algorithms can be based on various ‘features’, derived from physicochemical parameters (like charge or hydrophobicity of an amino acid) as well as looking at evolutionary relatedness.

Now that many such prediction programs have become available, it is of obvious value to have some kind of benchmark to validate and test the predictions. To resolve this quandary, Nielsen and Mulder generated and validated a representative experimental benchmarking set of site-specific and continuous disorder, using deposited NMR chemical shift data for more than a hundred selected proteins. They then analysed the performance of 26 widely-used disorder prediction methods and found that these vary noticeably.

The thorough comparison presented in their research will help protein scientists around the globe to make better informed choices about which programmes are best to use.

###

Read about the study in Scientific Reports: Quality and bias of protein disorder predictors.

For further information, please contact

Dr. Jakob Toudahl Nielsen

Department of Chemistry and Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center

[email protected] – +45 29938501 –

Associate Professor Frans Mulder

Department of Chemistry and Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center

[email protected] – +45 20725238 –

Media Contact
Frans Mulder
[email protected]

Original Source

http://inano.au.dk/about/news-events/news/show/artikel/how-good-are-protein-disorder-prediction-programmes-actually/

Related Journal Article

http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41644-w

Tags: BiochemistryBioinformaticsChemistry/Physics/Materials SciencesMolecular Biology
Share12Tweet8Share2ShareShareShare2

Related Posts

AI and Physics Collaborate to Design Advanced Hydrogen Storage Materials

June 25, 2026

International Team Including Dresden Scientists Develops Novel Designer Proteins for Advanced Study of Living Tissue

June 25, 2026

New Study Uncovers Key Factors Driving Water Chemistry in Nanoscale Environments

June 25, 2026

Plasma Technology Extends Catalyst Lifespan in Hydrogen Production

June 24, 2026
Please login to join discussion

POPULAR NEWS

  • Saying Goodbye to PGY-6: Pediatric Fellowship Realities

    103 shares
    Share 41 Tweet 26
  • Multi-Hospital Study Reveals Long Covid Burden Is Twice as High as Current Estimates

    92 shares
    Share 36 Tweet 23
  • Detection of EDCs in Breast Milk and Infant Urine Up to Six Months Highlights Early Exposure Risks

    77 shares
    Share 31 Tweet 19
  • New Drug Candidate Developed at McMaster Shows Potential for Treating Brain Cancer

    58 shares
    Share 23 Tweet 15

About

We bring you the latest biotechnology news from best research centers and universities around the world. Check our website.

Follow us

Recent News

Tracking Lanthanide-Labeled Microplastics in Plants

POSTECH Researchers Slash Cost of Reconstituted Cell-Free Systems by 95%

AI and Physics Collaborate to Design Advanced Hydrogen Storage Materials

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Success! An email was just sent to confirm your subscription. Please find the email now and click 'Confirm' to start subscribing.

Join 82 other subscribers
  • Contact Us

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Homepages
    • Home Page 1
    • Home Page 2
  • News
  • National
  • Business
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Science

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.