• HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
Thursday, June 25, 2026
BIOENGINEER.ORG
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
  • HOME
  • NEWS
  • EXPLORE
    • CAREER
      • Companies
      • Jobs
        • Lecturer
        • PhD Studentship
        • Postdoc
        • Research Assistant
    • EVENTS
    • iGEM
      • News
      • Team
    • PHOTOS
    • VIDEO
    • WIKI
  • BLOG
  • COMMUNITY
    • FACEBOOK
    • INSTAGRAM
    • TWITTER
No Result
View All Result
Bioengineer.org
No Result
View All Result
Home NEWS Science News Chemistry

Optimizing proton beam therapy with mathematical models

Bioengineer by Bioengineer
April 2, 2019
in Chemistry
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on RedditShare on Telegram

New model improves our understanding of energy transfer in radiotherapy treatment plans by replacing 50-year-old parameters with more complex ones

Particle beam therapy is increasingly being used to treat many types of cancer. It consists in subjecting tumours to beams of high-energy charged particles such as protons. Although more targeted than conventional radiotherapy using X-rays, this approach still damages surrounding normal tissue. To design the optimum treatment plan for each patient, it is essential to know the energy of the beam and its effect on tumour and normal tissue alike. In a recent study published in EPJ D, a group of researchers led by Ramin Abolfath at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA, put forward a new mathematical model outlining the effects of these beam therapies on patients’ tissues, based on new, more complex, parameters. Using these new models, clinicians should be able to predict the effect of proton beams on normal and tumour tissue more precisely, allowing them to prepare more effective treatment plans.

The therapeutic and toxic effects of a proton beam can both be described using a combination of two effects: first, the biological effect of the radiation; and second, the amount of energy the beam transfers to tissue per unit length travelled, referred to as linear energy transfer (LET).

For over half a century, clinicians have been basing treatment plans on standard radiobiological models. These involved just two parameters: alpha, which is proportional to LET; and beta, which is independent of LET.

In this new approach, the authors modelled the processes through which energy transfer from ionising radiation produces potentially lethal DNA damage on a microscopic scale. They then coupled it to models of the birth and death of cells in millimetre-scale colonies.

Abolfath and colleagues fitted their model to data on the response of lung cancer cells to therapeutic doses of proton beam irradiation, and found that the standard radiobiological models applied most poorly when the beam energy was low. They then used these findings to generate new models in which alpha and beta were replaced by more complex formulae, which are able to explain some observed anomalies in cell survival.

###

Reference

R. Abolfath, Y. Helo, L. Bronk, A. Carabe, D. Grosshans and R. Mohan (2019) Renormalization of radiobiological response functions by energy loss fluctuations and complexities in chromosome aberration induction: deactivation theory for proton therapy from cells to tumor control, European Physical Journal D 73: 64, DOI: 10.1140/epjd/e2019-90263-5

Media Contact
Sabine Lehr
[email protected]
http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2019-90263-5

Tags: Atomic/Molecular/Particle PhysicsChemistry/Physics/Materials Sciences
Share12Tweet8Share2ShareShareShare2

Related Posts

AI and Physics Collaborate to Design Advanced Hydrogen Storage Materials

June 25, 2026

International Team Including Dresden Scientists Develops Novel Designer Proteins for Advanced Study of Living Tissue

June 25, 2026

New Study Uncovers Key Factors Driving Water Chemistry in Nanoscale Environments

June 25, 2026

Plasma Technology Extends Catalyst Lifespan in Hydrogen Production

June 24, 2026
Please login to join discussion

POPULAR NEWS

  • Saying Goodbye to PGY-6: Pediatric Fellowship Realities

    103 shares
    Share 41 Tweet 26
  • Multi-Hospital Study Reveals Long Covid Burden Is Twice as High as Current Estimates

    92 shares
    Share 36 Tweet 23
  • Detection of EDCs in Breast Milk and Infant Urine Up to Six Months Highlights Early Exposure Risks

    77 shares
    Share 31 Tweet 19
  • New Drug Candidate Developed at McMaster Shows Potential for Treating Brain Cancer

    58 shares
    Share 23 Tweet 15

About

We bring you the latest biotechnology news from best research centers and universities around the world. Check our website.

Follow us

Recent News

Tracking Lanthanide-Labeled Microplastics in Plants

POSTECH Researchers Slash Cost of Reconstituted Cell-Free Systems by 95%

AI and Physics Collaborate to Design Advanced Hydrogen Storage Materials

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 82 other subscribers
  • Contact Us

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Homepages
    • Home Page 1
    • Home Page 2
  • News
  • National
  • Business
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Science

Bioengineer.org © Copyright 2023 All Rights Reserved.