<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Voter behavior manipulation &#8211; BIOENGINEER.ORG</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bioengineer.org/tag/voter-behavior-manipulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bioengineer.org</link>
	<description>Bioengineering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 09:18:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">72741379</site>	<item>
		<title>Persuading Voters Through Human-AI Dialogues</title>
		<link>https://bioengineer.org/persuading-voters-through-human-ai-dialogues/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioengineer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 09:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI ethics in democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI persuasion in elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Generative AI influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human-AI political dialogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter behavior manipulation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioengineer.org/persuading-voters-through-human-ai-dialogues/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Concerns about the intersection of artificial intelligence and democratic processes have reached a fever pitch in recent years. As large language models evolve in sophistication, their capacity to generate persuasive political discourse raises urgent questions about the influence such technologies could wield over voter attitudes and electoral outcomes. In a groundbreaking study published in Nature, [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">304815</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
