<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>steronomy &#8211; BIOENGINEER.ORG</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bioengineer.org/tag/steronomy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bioengineer.org</link>
	<description>Bioengineering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 02:36:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">72741379</site>	<item>
		<title>When Surgical Wounds Reopen: Review Finds Evidence for Skin Surgery Is Strikingly Thin</title>
		<link>https://bioengineer.org/when-surgical-wounds-reopen-review-finds-evidence-for-skin-surgery-is-strikingly-thin/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 02:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delayed primary closure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dermatologic surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infection risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mohs surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secondary intention healing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secondary re-closure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Complications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systematic review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wound dehiscence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wound Healing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioengineer.org/?p=421558</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A narrative review in the Archives of Dermatological Research finds that only three studies comprising 185 patients support management decisions for postoperative wound dehiscence, leaving dermatologic surgery without evidence-based guidance.]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">421558</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
