<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>scientific explanation &#8211; BIOENGINEER.ORG</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bioengineer.org/tag/scientific-explanation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bioengineer.org</link>
	<description>Bioengineering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 19:22:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">72741379</site>	<item>
		<title>New Research Reveals Early “Inherence” Bias in the History of Science</title>
		<link>https://bioengineer.org/new-research-reveals-early-inherence-bias-in-the-history-of-science/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioengineer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 19:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cognitive biases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history of science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inherence bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interdisciplinary research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientific explanation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioengineer.org/new-research-reveals-early-inherence-bias-in-the-history-of-science/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In the long arc of scientific discovery, the journey from initial hypothesis to mature understanding is rarely straightforward. A groundbreaking new study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences sheds light on a subtle but pervasive cognitive pattern that has shaped the trajectory of scientific progress for centuries. Researchers from the University [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">269333</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
