<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>respiratory monitoring &#8211; BIOENGINEER.ORG</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bioengineer.org/tag/respiratory-monitoring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bioengineer.org</link>
	<description>Bioengineering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 17:51:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">72741379</site>	<item>
		<title>Ensemble voting method tackles the problem of imperfect clinical reference standards in physiological monitoring</title>
		<link>https://bioengineer.org/ensemble-voting-method-tackles-the-problem-of-imperfect-clinical-reference-standards-in-physiological-monitoring/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 17:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjudication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Based]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinical measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Critical Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diagnostics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ensemble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[label]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine Learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[respiratory monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[validation methods]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioengineer.org/?p=430906</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When a new monitoring device disagrees with the clinical assessment it is supposed to improve, standard diagnostic accuracy analyses cannot say which one is wrong. A methodological study published in Physiological Reports introduces a way to adjudicate such standoffs, and]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">430906</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
