<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>perinatal etik** **Açıklama:** 1. **neonatal resüsitasyon kararları:** Makalenin ana konusu olan yenidoğan canlandırma kar &#8211; BIOENGINEER.ORG</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bioengineer.org/tag/perinatal-etik-aciklama-1-neonatal-resusitasyon-kararlari-makalenin-ana-konusu-olan-yenidogan-canlandirma-kar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bioengineer.org</link>
	<description>Bioengineering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 15:16:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">72741379</site>	<item>
		<title>Provider Views on 22-Week Counseling and Resuscitation Decisions</title>
		<link>https://bioengineer.org/provider-views-on-22-week-counseling-and-resuscitation-decisions/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bioengineer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 15:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[22 haftalık gebelik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aile danışmanlığı]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[and decision-making processes regarding resuscitation at 22 weeks gestation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Based on the content focusing on healthcare provider perspectives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counseling challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethical dilemmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[here are 5 appropriate tags: **22-week resuscitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[İşte 5 uygun etiket: **neonatal resüsitasyon kararları]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neonatal ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perinatal etik** **Açıklama:** 1. **neonatal resüsitasyon kararları:** Makalenin ana konusu olan yenidoğan canlandırma kar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[periviable counseling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[provider perspectives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sağlık çalışanı bakış açıları]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioengineer.org/provider-views-on-22-week-counseling-and-resuscitation-decisions/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In the ever-evolving landscape of neonatal intensive care, one of the most contentious and emotionally charged decisions revolves around the resuscitation of infants born at the threshold of viability—specifically, those born at 22 weeks gestational age (GA). A recent study published in the Journal of Perinatology sheds light on healthcare providers’ perspectives concerning the best [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">313763</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
