<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mechanical cleansing &#8211; BIOENGINEER.ORG</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bioengineer.org/tag/mechanical-cleansing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bioengineer.org</link>
	<description>Bioengineering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 23:31:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">72741379</site>	<item>
		<title>Foam pad outperforms gauze at stripping wound biofilms in pig-skin model</title>
		<link>https://bioengineer.org/foam-pad-outperforms-gauze-at-stripping-wound-biofilms-in-pig-skin-model/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 23:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofilm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cotton gauze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debridement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ex vivo model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foam pad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanical cleansing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porcine wound model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pseudomonas aeruginosa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Staphylococcus aureus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wound care]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioengineer.org/?p=458165</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In an ex vivo porcine wound model, a two-sided foam pad achieved greater than 90% model-derived removal of viable Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound biofilms across all tested debridement schedules, significantly outperforming cotton gauze.]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">458165</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
