<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>decoupling &#8211; BIOENGINEER.ORG</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bioengineer.org/tag/decoupling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bioengineer.org</link>
	<description>Bioengineering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 13:02:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">72741379</site>	<item>
		<title>Two Theories, One Answer: Mathematicians Untangle the Hidden Math of NMR Spectroscopy</title>
		<link>https://bioengineer.org/two-theories-one-answer-mathematicians-untangle-the-hidden-math-of-nmr-spectroscopy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 13:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[average Hamiltonian theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloch-Siegert shift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decoupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effective Hamiltonian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Floquet theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Floquet-Magnus expansion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kick operator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magic-angle spinning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NMR spectroscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perturbation theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid-state NMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spin dynamics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://bioengineer.org/?p=407526</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new theoretical study proves the mathematical equivalence of Floquet theory and average Hamiltonian theory and shows why the Floquet approach delivers roughly three times better accuracy for analyzing magic-angle spinning NMR experiments.]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">407526</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
