<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Consumers beware: High user star ratings dont mean a mobile medical app works	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://bioengineer.org/consumers-beware-high-user-%C2%91star-ratings%C2%92-don%C2%92t-mean-a-mobile-medical-app-works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://bioengineer.org/consumers-beware-high-user-%c2%91star-ratings%c2%92-don%c2%92t-mean-a-mobile-medical-app-works/</link>
	<description>Bioengineering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2018 23:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
</channel>
</rss>
